Increase in T3CC fragments from daily quest

An_Asian_1

Comments

Fhfjghhggggjfhfjg

Yes it definitely needs increase

Chubz

Yes a 1000x because for 100% exploration it totals like 625 total T3CC.. come on KABAM!!

KRONOSDOUBLE

I think there should be an uncollected daily quest, for those who are uncollected

An_Asian_1

@Kabam Miike thoughts?

Jestr54

I usually get one complete one when I run the harder path but I’ll always take more. 💁🏻‍♂️

KevanproG

100 percent exploration should give u a fully form in my Opinion

An_Asian_1

Can more people comment or agree with this post and share with their alliance mates?

abqber

I totally agree, it atleast should guarantee a full formed for 100%. Or else it's just not worth it at all for all the energy spent. This month it wasn't a problem, I farmed a lot of t3cc from heroic uncanny danger rooms. But the scarcity will be felt from next month on

Willjackson16

Either increase them or put the class ones in the glory store

SlayerKing

Yes increase them nice

Thanos_Car

I just pulled a fully formed from the chest... feels like i won the lottery lol. Yeah, they need an increase, along with the t4b quest.

Lurker

@john757 I would like to hear your dissenting opinion on why the t3cc shards are just right.

John757

Lurker wrote: »

@john757 I would like to hear your dissenting opinion on why the t3cc shards are just right.

LeNoirFaineant

I don't care if they increase the fragments. It ought to award a full cat for completing both sides though.

John757

@Lurker how you like them apples

Lurker

John757 wrote: »

@Lurker how you like them apples

@John757 I get it. I'm asking why you think "the right way" is large amounts of time and energy for a few shards of a basic rank up item. So basic that you can auto fight the whole path with champs you haven't used since 2016? Why do you think requiring several months of farming for a basic resource is "the right way"? (assuming you don't get lucky with chest)

without the "why", your response is "because I didn't want the poll to be unanimous".

John757

Because there is a balance. Yeah it seems like a pain for high end players but lower level players should have to work as well to upgrade their champs or people would be progressing too fast

LeNoirFaineant

John757 wrote: »

Because there is a balance. Yeah it seems like a pain for high end players but lower level players should have to work as well to upgrade their champs or people would be progressing too fast

Lower level players get them like candy from AQ maps 2-3 lol

John757

LeNoirFaineant wrote: »

John757 wrote: »

Because there is a balance. Yeah it seems like a pain for high end players but lower level players should have to work as well to upgrade their champs or people would be progressing too fast

Lower level players get them like candy from AQ maps 2-3 lol

Then do those maps

LeNoirFaineant

John757 wrote: »

LeNoirFaineant wrote: »

John757 wrote: »

Because there is a balance. Yeah it seems like a pain for high end players but lower level players should have to work as well to upgrade their champs or people would be progressing too fast

Lower level players get them like candy from AQ maps 2-3 lol

Then do those maps

If I wanted AQ to be even more boring than it is already, lose valuable alliance members, and stop getting t2 alphas I suppose that would be an option. Or, they could provide something that could give low level resources like this with a little work. Don't know what it would be but maybe... I don't know, maybe a daily quest once a week if you explore both sides? Just a thought.

LeNoirFaineant

Besides which, @John757 you made the (erroneous) point that lower level players would progress too fast if they didn't have to work for these items. I pointed out that they already don't have to because they get them like candy and you abandoned your point. How would top tier alliances abandoning top tier AQ for low level resources achieve balance? Kabam has said more than once that you should run the highest AQ you can.

John757

Would you like a cookie

LeNoirFaineant

John757 wrote: »

Would you like a cookie

Why would I need a cookie because you are wrong?