Actually only getting 4* shards from being Proven at the end of the month is a downgrade from getting 5* shards and is just going to make it that much harder to advance in the game, this new calendar is a disappointment
Even after becoming uncollected, 4 stars are currently more useful to me than 7.5% of a 5 star crystal.You don't NEED 5 stars to become uncollected..In my opinion, this was a good upgrade. It could have been better but still it is in no way "A slap in the face"
New calendars are a joke for those who have not reached uncollected. I’m grinding to get through act 5 and can’t do it without upgrading my small roster of 5* champs and you go and take away a good source of 5 star crystals from us. Thanks for nothing.
Even after becoming uncollected, 4 stars are currently more useful to me than 7.5% of a 5 star crystal.You don't NEED 5 stars to become uncollected..In my opinion, this was a good upgrade. It could have been better but still it is in no way "A slap in the face" I just became UC and I don’t open 5 stars, I got almost 6 5*crystals.5 stars only become interesting if you can rank them r4, otherwise 4 stars are stronger because of dupe/sig.
It’s not about worthiness of the champ, it’s about resources . To go to 5*r4 you need 12 t4b, 7 t4cc, 16 t1alpha and 4 t2 alpha.
All we are getting from complaining about the calender is put down talk from upper tier players who aren't affected by it and just look for a reason to say "get better". This has affected a lot of players and if we don't voice our concerns then it just gets looked over. Let them nerf a few God tier champs and the uppers will lose their minds, we've already seen that go down, and kabam listened eventually. What's wrong with those who are not uncollected complaining when they basically "nerfed" our calender. All this talk about "your better getting more 4* champs" is funny seeing all the complaints I read of people saying upper calender didn't get enough 6* shards. Not mentioning the conqueror class just got left out completely.
It’s not about worthiness of the champ, it’s about resources . To go to 5*r4 you need 12 t4b, 7 t4cc, 16 t1alpha and 4 t2 alpha. Ranking a 5* to r3 gets you an equivalent hero to a r5 4* and takes less resources overall. With how difficult resources are to get, why would you ever take a 4* to r5 unless you are forced to because of lack of 5* availability due to things like the new calendar and not letting conqueror level into Epic.
It’s simply where I am at in the game, probably take a year or more to become cavalier, as it should be. In the mean time I got all these awesome duped 4 stars which I have so much fun to play with.I know it is an unpopular opinion, but I choose 4 stars over 5 stars until I am ready to take the next step.
At this point, I would like to continue getting 5-star shards. Replacing those fully with 6-star shards is not ideal. There are plenty of 5-stars I'd still like to get for the first time (Hyperion, Magik, Stark Spidey, etc.) and several others I'd like to dupe. I have a 6-star King Groot and Omega Red, but they weren't what got me through Act 6. The duped 5-star Omega Red is better.
Actually only getting 4* shards from being Proven at the end of the month is a downgrade from getting 5* shards and is just going to make it that much harder to advance in the game, this new calendar is a disappointment I see the opposite, more regular 4* champions , 1 a month (instead of the 1-2 5* Per year you'd get with the old) will help you to tackle challenges sooner rather than later.