10+ days

Alliance lvl 1 team revives have been absent from the loyalty store for more than 10 days. It's starting to be a bit ridiculous. That's one full AQ rotation > another without the ability to buy and stock up.

Comments

Lightvayne

Been showing up for me just fine

Patchie93

I mean i always have lvl2 revives in over flow from alliance events. Maybe if AQ or AW is costing you more revives then you can keep up with your on to hard of a map

unknown

This content has been removed.

GinjabredMonsta

Maybe you need to challenge yourself less?

unknown

This content has been removed.

RonD9

Hey I agree. Loyalty store is way too random. And these guys commenting about what you should be playing or not... are just trolling ya.

Jaded

Maybe you need to challenge yourself less?

Maybe you need to check yourself before you wreck yourself.

As if people actually have a problem with people asking why the level 1 alliance revives haven’t been in the store lately. Regardless of why or how they need them, it doesn’t matter to you.

Childish people always find something to complain about.

Patchie93

Maybe you need to challenge yourself less?
Maybe you need to check yourself before you wreck yourself.

As if people actually have a problem with people asking why the level 1 alliance revives haven’t been in the store lately. Regardless of why or how they need them, it doesn’t matter to you.

Childish people always find something to complain about.

I mean at this point everyone should know its random means it could hypothetically come around once a year. Tho that's highly improbable.
Or it could pop up 3x in 5 days also improbable

Jaded

Maybe you need to challenge yourself less?
Maybe you need to check yourself before you wreck yourself.

As if people actually have a problem with people asking why the level 1 alliance revives haven’t been in the store lately. Regardless of why or how they need them, it doesn’t matter to you.

Childish people always find something to complain about.
I mean at this point everyone should know its random means it could hypothetically come around once a year. Tho that's highly improbable.
Or it could pop up 3x in 5 days also improbable

Doesn’t matter, again. What people “should” know or what you expect people to know. You aren’t part of the equation. It’s between two different parties.

GinjabredMonsta

Maybe you need to challenge yourself less?
Maybe you need to check yourself before you wreck yourself.

As if people actually have a problem with people asking why the level 1 alliance revives haven’t been in the store lately. Regardless of why or how they need them, it doesn’t matter to you.

Childish people always find something to complain about.

Chill man, you're coming off kinda jaded

Jaded

Maybe you need to challenge yourself less?
Maybe you need to check yourself before you wreck yourself.

As if people actually have a problem with people asking why the level 1 alliance revives haven’t been in the store lately. Regardless of why or how they need them, it doesn’t matter to you.

Childish people always find something to complain about.
Chill man, you're coming off kinda jaded

Maybe you need to challenge yourself more.
Turtle back to your map 3, tier 12 wars child.

GinjabredMonsta

Maybe you need to challenge yourself less?
Maybe you need to check yourself before you wreck yourself.

As if people actually have a problem with people asking why the level 1 alliance revives haven’t been in the store lately. Regardless of why or how they need them, it doesn’t matter to you.

Childish people always find something to complain about.
Chill man, you're coming off kinda jaded
Maybe you need to challenge yourself more.
Turtle back to your map 3, tier 12 wars child.

I'm sorry I don't constantly need to use revives? You got real aggressive about this, shows passion but also unneeded. I challenge myself and still manage to be in overflow of revives. Have a goodnight though haha

Jaded

Maybe you need to challenge yourself less?
Maybe you need to check yourself before you wreck yourself.

As if people actually have a problem with people asking why the level 1 alliance revives haven’t been in the store lately. Regardless of why or how they need them, it doesn’t matter to you.

Childish people always find something to complain about.
Chill man, you're coming off kinda jaded
Maybe you need to challenge yourself more.
Turtle back to your map 3, tier 12 wars child.
I'm sorry I don't constantly need to use revives? You got real aggressive about this, shows passion but also unneeded. I challenge myself and still manage to be in overflow of revives. Have a goodnight though haha

Aggressive how? You don’t need them, then you don’t need to comment. Pretty simple. If anything you’re being aggressive going after people who want revives because you have an “overflow” of them. Well done.

DNA3000

You don’t need them, then you don’t need to comment. Pretty simple.

That's not how the forums work. The forums primary purpose is to facilitate discussion between players, including (respectful) disagreement. Anyone who tells another forum poster that they should only participate if they agree with the other posters in the thread is not reflecting the intent of the forums.

Jaded

You don’t need them, then you don’t need to comment. Pretty simple.
That's not how the forums work. The forums primary purpose is to facilitate discussion between players, including (respectful) disagreement. Anyone who tells another forum poster that they should only participate if they agree with the other posters in the thread is not reflecting the intent of the forums.

You used the word agree. There is no agreeing or disagreeing here. OP is making a statement that is true to them. Telling the aforementioned person to do less in the game isn’t productive towards the thread. Nor does the OP need anyone to agree or disagree with them. It’s a fact the revives haven’t been there in 10+ days. So simply commenting on this thread to shame the OP in their use of revives is pointless and childish.

unknown

This content has been removed.

unknown

This content has been removed.

unknown

This content has been removed.

DNA3000

You don’t need them, then you don’t need to comment. Pretty simple.
That's not how the forums work. The forums primary purpose is to facilitate discussion between players, including (respectful) disagreement. Anyone who tells another forum poster that they should only participate if they agree with the other posters in the thread is not reflecting the intent of the forums.
You used the word agree. There is no agreeing or disagreeing here. OP is making a statement that is true to them. Telling the aforementioned person to do less in the game isn’t productive towards the thread. Nor does the OP need anyone to agree or disagree with them. It’s a fact the revives haven’t been there in 10+ days. So simply commenting on this thread to shame the OP in their use of revives is pointless and childish.

Everyone says things that are "true to them." That's a statement with no relevance. The OP said: "Alliance lvl 1 team revives have been absent from the loyalty store for more than 10 days. It's starting to be a bit ridiculous. That's one full AQ rotation > another without the ability to buy and stock up." That is a position that can be agreed with, disagreed with, or responded to in parallel. Particularly the "bit ridiculous" part.

Furthermore, there's no easy colloquial way to characterize "if you don't need them then you don't need to comment" except in terms of the general idea of agreement and disagreement. But if you prefer, or rather you have the specific requirement to have things put to you in a more precise manner, then any statement that a poster makes on the forums should be considered a public statement that can be replied to or rebutted in any way, by any other poster, including but not limited to direct refutation, indirect refutation, general agreement, specific agreement, topic expansion, generalization, amplification, corollary, logical extrapolation, tangentiation, inspiration, semantic connection, referentiation, interrogation, or encapsulation, or any combination thereof.

It is also not "shaming" to tell someone that if they are running out of a resource, then perhaps they should modify their play to reduce the need for that resource. And more specifically if you're doing content you find difficult to do with the time, resources, roster, and skill level you possess, the correct thing to do is to reduce the difficulty of the content you're doing because no one is entitled to do any specific tier of content, or entitled to have a way to gain the resources they need to do it.

Jaded

You don’t need them, then you don’t need to comment. Pretty simple.
That's not how the forums work. The forums primary purpose is to facilitate discussion between players, including (respectful) disagreement. Anyone who tells another forum poster that they should only participate if they agree with the other posters in the thread is not reflecting the intent of the forums.
You used the word agree. There is no agreeing or disagreeing here. OP is making a statement that is true to them. Telling the aforementioned person to do less in the game isn’t productive towards the thread. Nor does the OP need anyone to agree or disagree with them. It’s a fact the revives haven’t been there in 10+ days. So simply commenting on this thread to shame the OP in their use of revives is pointless and childish.
Everyone says things that are "true to them." That's a statement with no relevance. The OP said: "Alliance lvl 1 team revives have been absent from the loyalty store for more than 10 days. It's starting to be a bit ridiculous. That's one full AQ rotation > another without the ability to buy and stock up." That is a position that can be agreed with, disagreed with, or responded to in parallel. Particularly the "bit ridiculous" part.

Furthermore, there's no easy colloquial way to characterize "if you don't need them then you don't need to comment" except in terms of the general idea of agreement and disagreement. But if you prefer, or rather you have the specific requirement to have things put to you in a more precise manner, then any statement that a poster makes on the forums should be considered a public statement that can be replied to or rebutted in any way, by any other poster, including but not limited to direct refutation, indirect refutation, general agreement, specific agreement, topic expansion, generalization, amplification, corollary, logical extrapolation, tangentiation, inspiration, semantic connection, referentiation, interrogation, or encapsulation, or any combination thereof.

It is also not "shaming" to tell someone that if they are running out of a resource, then perhaps they should modify their play to reduce the need for that resource. And more specifically if you're doing content you find difficult to do with the time, resources, roster, and skill level you possess, the correct thing to do is to reduce the difficulty of the content you're doing because no one is entitled to do any specific tier of content, or entitled to have a way to gain the resources they need to do it.

No, not at all. Your statement would only hold true if those commenting had any productive manner towards the concern OP presented. Since they aren’t kabam employees, they physically can not have any insight towards the problem. Making everything they say a negative reaction towards the concern. The specific way OP wants to word it has no barring on how one could respond. They choose to read and comment negatively. Thus creating a derailed on-going thread.

Just because the internet gave everyone a voice, doesn’t mean everyone needs to hear it.

unknown

This content has been removed.

DNA3000

You don’t need them, then you don’t need to comment. Pretty simple.
That's not how the forums work. The forums primary purpose is to facilitate discussion between players, including (respectful) disagreement. Anyone who tells another forum poster that they should only participate if they agree with the other posters in the thread is not reflecting the intent of the forums.
You used the word agree. There is no agreeing or disagreeing here. OP is making a statement that is true to them. Telling the aforementioned person to do less in the game isn’t productive towards the thread. Nor does the OP need anyone to agree or disagree with them. It’s a fact the revives haven’t been there in 10+ days. So simply commenting on this thread to shame the OP in their use of revives is pointless and childish.
Everyone says things that are "true to them." That's a statement with no relevance. The OP said: "Alliance lvl 1 team revives have been absent from the loyalty store for more than 10 days. It's starting to be a bit ridiculous. That's one full AQ rotation > another without the ability to buy and stock up." That is a position that can be agreed with, disagreed with, or responded to in parallel. Particularly the "bit ridiculous" part.

Furthermore, there's no easy colloquial way to characterize "if you don't need them then you don't need to comment" except in terms of the general idea of agreement and disagreement. But if you prefer, or rather you have the specific requirement to have things put to you in a more precise manner, then any statement that a poster makes on the forums should be considered a public statement that can be replied to or rebutted in any way, by any other poster, including but not limited to direct refutation, indirect refutation, general agreement, specific agreement, topic expansion, generalization, amplification, corollary, logical extrapolation, tangentiation, inspiration, semantic connection, referentiation, interrogation, or encapsulation, or any combination thereof.

It is also not "shaming" to tell someone that if they are running out of a resource, then perhaps they should modify their play to reduce the need for that resource. And more specifically if you're doing content you find difficult to do with the time, resources, roster, and skill level you possess, the correct thing to do is to reduce the difficulty of the content you're doing because no one is entitled to do any specific tier of content, or entitled to have a way to gain the resources they need to do it.
No, not at all. Your statement would only hold true if those commenting had any productive manner towards the concern OP presented. Since they aren’t kabam employees, they physically can not have any insight towards the problem. Making everything they say a negative reaction towards the concern. The specific way OP wants to word it has no barring on how one could respond. They choose to read and comment negatively. Thus creating a derailed on-going thread.

Just because the internet gave everyone a voice, doesn’t mean everyone needs to hear it.

I'm afraid your position is untenable. If you actually believed what you were saying, then since you aren't a Kabam community employee, you cannot have any insight towards the proper use of the forums. You therefore should not comment on any posts I or anyone else makes about the proper use of the forum.

In fact, people make comments about the game all the time. They make requests, they ask questions, they critique it. There is no fundamental requirement that the people replying have professional insight into the topic being discussed. This is a forum for players and players' opinions and discussions. If you are unwilling to hear what other players think of your post, you should not post here. That's what gives them the right to respond to the OP, and you the right to respond to me.

To put it bluntly, anyone can suggest or ask for anything, but they must be willing to hear the voices of the players who think they shouldn't or that the game would be worse off for it or that the player may not have reasonable expectations. There is no forum rule that says players cannot be "negative," the definition of "derailed" is not "the people replying don't react positively to the poster" and no one has the right to dictate how other people choose to respond to their posts.

In any event, I don't have the right or power to dictate how you post either, and that includes your right to attempt to dissuade others from responding to a post in a particular way. I'm simply stating, for the benefit of anyone that might be confused, that they have the right to respond in any way they see fit so long as their post falls within the rules of the forum and anyone suggesting otherwise is simply wrong. People should be cordial and respectful, but they have no obligation to be positive.

Jaded

You don’t need them, then you don’t need to comment. Pretty simple.
That's not how the forums work. The forums primary purpose is to facilitate discussion between players, including (respectful) disagreement. Anyone who tells another forum poster that they should only participate if they agree with the other posters in the thread is not reflecting the intent of the forums.
You used the word agree. There is no agreeing or disagreeing here. OP is making a statement that is true to them. Telling the aforementioned person to do less in the game isn’t productive towards the thread. Nor does the OP need anyone to agree or disagree with them. It’s a fact the revives haven’t been there in 10+ days. So simply commenting on this thread to shame the OP in their use of revives is pointless and childish.
Everyone says things that are "true to them." That's a statement with no relevance. The OP said: "Alliance lvl 1 team revives have been absent from the loyalty store for more than 10 days. It's starting to be a bit ridiculous. That's one full AQ rotation > another without the ability to buy and stock up." That is a position that can be agreed with, disagreed with, or responded to in parallel. Particularly the "bit ridiculous" part.

Furthermore, there's no easy colloquial way to characterize "if you don't need them then you don't need to comment" except in terms of the general idea of agreement and disagreement. But if you prefer, or rather you have the specific requirement to have things put to you in a more precise manner, then any statement that a poster makes on the forums should be considered a public statement that can be replied to or rebutted in any way, by any other poster, including but not limited to direct refutation, indirect refutation, general agreement, specific agreement, topic expansion, generalization, amplification, corollary, logical extrapolation, tangentiation, inspiration, semantic connection, referentiation, interrogation, or encapsulation, or any combination thereof.

It is also not "shaming" to tell someone that if they are running out of a resource, then perhaps they should modify their play to reduce the need for that resource. And more specifically if you're doing content you find difficult to do with the time, resources, roster, and skill level you possess, the correct thing to do is to reduce the difficulty of the content you're doing because no one is entitled to do any specific tier of content, or entitled to have a way to gain the resources they need to do it.
No, not at all. Your statement would only hold true if those commenting had any productive manner towards the concern OP presented. Since they aren’t kabam employees, they physically can not have any insight towards the problem. Making everything they say a negative reaction towards the concern. The specific way OP wants to word it has no barring on how one could respond. They choose to read and comment negatively. Thus creating a derailed on-going thread.

Just because the internet gave everyone a voice, doesn’t mean everyone needs to hear it.
I'm afraid your position is untenable. If you actually believed what you were saying, then since you aren't a Kabam community employee, you cannot have any insight towards the proper use of the forums. You therefore should not comment on any posts I or anyone else makes about the proper use of the forum.

In fact, people make comments about the game all the time. They make requests, they ask questions, they critique it. There is no fundamental requirement that the people replying have professional insight into the topic being discussed. This is a forum for players and players' opinions and discussions. If you are unwilling to hear what other players think of your post, you should not post here. That's what gives them the right to respond to the OP, and you the right to respond to me.

To put it bluntly, anyone can suggest or ask for anything, but they must be willing to hear the voices of the players who think they shouldn't or that the game would be worse off for it or that the player may not have reasonable expectations. There is no forum rule that says players cannot be "negative," the definition of "derailed" is not "the people replying don't react positively to the poster" and no one has the right to dictate how other people choose to respond to their posts.

In any event, I don't have the right or power to dictate how you post either, and that includes your right to attempt to dissuade others from responding to a post in a particular way. I'm simply stating, for the benefit of anyone that might be confused, that they have the right to respond in any way they see fit so long as their post falls within the rules of the forum and anyone suggesting otherwise is simply wrong. People should be cordial and respectful, but they have no obligation to be positive.

Well actually this comment I can agree with. But unfortunately it’s now taken this thread beyond what was needed.

unknown

This content has been removed.

DNA3000

Now I get it..... you’re talking smack about your stash yet your account clearly doesn’t even come close to touching the paths and nodes I encounter on a day to day basis. We’re basically playing two different games. Your opinion means jack.

We're all playing the same game, at different paces. Your experience with higher difficulty content makes you more knowledgeable about that content, definitely, than anyone not doing that content but that means you should be a better judge of whether you can do that content within the limits of the resources you can earn.

If the poster you're referring to tried to do the content you're doing now and couldn't, would he be justified in saying that the problem was the game didn't give him enough resources to do it? If he needed twice the revives you do, or ten times the revives you do, would he be justified in saying that there were not enough revives and they should be increased until he could do Map 7?

I've seen Map 7 and I know enough to know I don't want to run it every day, or really any day. I could, but it would be expensive and I wouldn't be enjoying myself. But is that because I'm not good enough to run it sustainably, or is that because the game is at fault for not giving me enough stuff to run it?

No one should be judging you for needing revives in Map 7, and I don't think that's what this is about. I'm sure I would need more of them than you do. But why should the game change to make them available enough for you, and not for me, or him, or anyone else? Where's that line drawn? Who should get to demand more resources, and who should be told to step down to a lower difficulty because it is beyond them? Shouldn't *everyone* be told to try to play within their means, just to be fair?

GinjabredMonsta

Well I was really not wanting to comment on this anymore because honestly, it wasn't a big deal. But you actually got so upset by a comment that you went to screenshot my profile and post it just to talk down on me about it? First off, you told someone that maybe they should challenge themselves more, so in response to that I told you the opposite. I'm not sure why you can get upset and tell someone to try harder but when I say the opposite it causes an uproar. Second, I don't run map 7 or 6, and that's fine with me because I know for a fact I can't handle those and I play withing my limits and I challenge myself to improve so that I don't need to constantly use revives because you know, that's what growing does. That doesn't make my opinion any more or less than yours. Hope that made you feel better though I guess?