6.3.6 thunderstruck bug

The node clearly states the interaction of the node with passives, but it doesn’t register archangel’s neurotoxin as a passive. It still does 90% less damage. In archangel’s description it’s listed as a passive in the heading! Unless I’m missing something (I’m not) this needs to be fixed!

Comments

Lvernon15

It means shock debuffs and passives, as in shock of any form, not passives as any passive dot

Noobalicious

Read it again brother

xNig

Read it again brother

Back to you bruh

Lvernon15

Read it again brother

You need to

Noobalicious

Exc

Excellent response, friend. You are aware that neurotoxin defined as a passive, yes? Perhaps English isn’t your first language so I’ll explain the last part of that Thunderstruck definition for you. It says that the defender will take only 10% of the damage it would normally take unless they are inflicted with a shock or a passive. The crazy thing about that little word “or” is that you only need one “or” the other. Not both. As soon as the neurotoxin (as a passive) is applied, like a shock, the defender, according to the Thunderstruck definition, should take 100% damage. Actually, more because the neurotoxin is a passive and by definition the defender would take 25% more.

Primmer79

shock debuffs and shock passives, is what it means. Shock, debuffs and passives...

chalk it up to a grammatical error everyone understood before you.

If it meant just passives, instead of shock passives, it would say shock debuffs and passive effects.

Noobalicious

Well that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.

xNig

Exc
Excellent response, friend. You are aware that neurotoxin defined as a passive, yes? Perhaps English isn’t your first language so I’ll explain the last part of that Thunderstruck definition for you. It says that the defender will take only 10% of the damage it would normally take unless they are inflicted with a shock or a passive. The crazy thing about that little word “or” is that you only need one “or” the other. Not both. As soon as the neurotoxin (as a passive) is applied, like a shock, the defender, according to the Thunderstruck definition, should take 100% damage. Actually, more because the neurotoxin is a passive and by definition the defender would take 25% more.

Lol.

Shock “debuff or passive”. Maybe English isn’t your first language.

Noobalicious

No English is my first language but I do have a learning disability. It occurs to me that I came off like a smarmy git here. Apologies all.

Lvernon15

Exc
Excellent response, friend. You are aware that neurotoxin defined as a passive, yes? Perhaps English isn’t your first language so I’ll explain the last part of that Thunderstruck definition for you. It says that the defender will take only 10% of the damage it would normally take unless they are inflicted with a shock or a passive. The crazy thing about that little word “or” is that you only need one “or” the other. Not both. As soon as the neurotoxin (as a passive) is applied, like a shock, the defender, according to the Thunderstruck definition, should take 100% damage. Actually, more because the neurotoxin is a passive and by definition the defender would take 25% more.

Why don’t you stop trying to patronise people, it means shock or shock passive, that how everyone but you seems to read it, that’s how it does read, if it doesn’t read as that then what is a ‘passive’? If it doesn’t mean shock does it mean any passive effect? That makes no sense. It’s shock or shock passive, that’s what it is