Sungj wrote: » DrZola wrote: » Let's be honest, Sungj: A new player who pulls a lone Luke/Cyke/AntMan/Loki/Gwen/HB/Groot/IP/ IF/Colossus/Mags/Kamala/Miles/Shulk/OML/NFDD or any of the other few dozen 5* clunkers they are bound to get is not going to be able to steamroll end game content. So releasing another half a 5* over another month calendar would hardly throw the Contest out of balance. Dr. Zola Yes but what about the other half that pulls x-23, mordo, nightcrawler, moonknight, ultron, storm, cyclops, wintersoldier, hawkeye, yellow jacket,magik, guillotine, drax,, hulk, elektra, symbiote spiderman, rocket raccoon, agent venom, corssbones, beast etc. With the current pool more than half of the champions even unduped can carry a player who has only been playing for a few months through the entirety of act 4 as well as a clear of act 5.1 so thats over half of the beginner player base that was handed out a progression negating champion. With any of the champions I listed 3 stars would no longer be anywhere near a priority and four stars and would take a back seat as well. People who barely play but just login everyday would get progression it took regular players hard grinding to get not just had it handed to us.
DrZola wrote: » Let's be honest, Sungj: A new player who pulls a lone Luke/Cyke/AntMan/Loki/Gwen/HB/Groot/IP/ IF/Colossus/Mags/Kamala/Miles/Shulk/OML/NFDD or any of the other few dozen 5* clunkers they are bound to get is not going to be able to steamroll end game content. So releasing another half a 5* over another month calendar would hardly throw the Contest out of balance. Dr. Zola
TheSOURA wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » DrZola wrote: » In an absolutely literal, "read zero between the lines" sense, it is correct to say that nothing was said about 5* shards being in the calendar every month. But for everyone who communicates relatively normally, the implication--plainly put out there in mod statements--was that we shouldn't worry about 6*'s too much because 5* shards would be made more available, a statement which was apparently intended to reassure angry and anxious forums members. Miike has commented on it a little further in another thread. I don't have it handy, but it didn't illuminate much. I believe he hung his hat on the availability of 5* as a rare drop in GMCs if I recall correctly. Dr. Zola The statement was made that they would be made more available, yes. However, we're quite far off from when 6*'s will be playable. That doesn't necessarily mean they will be immediate or in the Calendar. I'm assuming there will be a variety of sources. Rewards, Offers, etc. There is lots of time between now and then, and even with their onset, 6*'s will be quite rare. @GroundedWisdom can u pls show uor profile. Just curious to c how much uor account & roster is developped that u dont need further reward like others r saying!
GroundedWisdom wrote: » DrZola wrote: » In an absolutely literal, "read zero between the lines" sense, it is correct to say that nothing was said about 5* shards being in the calendar every month. But for everyone who communicates relatively normally, the implication--plainly put out there in mod statements--was that we shouldn't worry about 6*'s too much because 5* shards would be made more available, a statement which was apparently intended to reassure angry and anxious forums members. Miike has commented on it a little further in another thread. I don't have it handy, but it didn't illuminate much. I believe he hung his hat on the availability of 5* as a rare drop in GMCs if I recall correctly. Dr. Zola The statement was made that they would be made more available, yes. However, we're quite far off from when 6*'s will be playable. That doesn't necessarily mean they will be immediate or in the Calendar. I'm assuming there will be a variety of sources. Rewards, Offers, etc. There is lots of time between now and then, and even with their onset, 6*'s will be quite rare.
DrZola wrote: » In an absolutely literal, "read zero between the lines" sense, it is correct to say that nothing was said about 5* shards being in the calendar every month. But for everyone who communicates relatively normally, the implication--plainly put out there in mod statements--was that we shouldn't worry about 6*'s too much because 5* shards would be made more available, a statement which was apparently intended to reassure angry and anxious forums members. Miike has commented on it a little further in another thread. I don't have it handy, but it didn't illuminate much. I believe he hung his hat on the availability of 5* as a rare drop in GMCs if I recall correctly. Dr. Zola
TheSOURA wrote: »
GroundedWisdom wrote: » I've already outlined the fact that they have many Players and all Levels who receive the same Calendar, and that they switch it up to give a variety of Rewards over the year. Let's put it another way. Do we expect them to give Shards this month AND a GMC that could potentially give a fully formed 5*? Not logically. The problem is undoubtedly expectations.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » DrZola wrote: » Let's be honest: A new player who pulls a lone Luke/Cyke/AntMan/Loki/Gwen/HB/Groot/IP/ IF/Colossus/Mags/Kamala/Miles/Shulk/OML/NFDD or any of the other few dozen 5* clunkers they are bound to get is not going to be able to steamroll end game content. So releasing another half a 5* over another month calendar is hardly going to toss the Contest out of balance. Dr. Zola I've answered this in another Thread, but I'll do it again here. There are many different Player Levels that receive the same Calendar. They try to accommodate a variety of Rewards for all Players. I'm sure many would like every month to be 5* Shards, but that wouldn't be much use for newer Players starting out. They also have value. Just because 6*'s are coming doesn't mean they're going to hand out 5*s with every monthly. They change the Calendar every month to give a variety of Rewards all year long. They're not usually the same. This month has some great Rewards. They're literally giving all Players a chance to win a 5*. The problem is people heard the Announcement and expected it to rain 5*'s. Lol.
DrZola wrote: » Let's be honest: A new player who pulls a lone Luke/Cyke/AntMan/Loki/Gwen/HB/Groot/IP/ IF/Colossus/Mags/Kamala/Miles/Shulk/OML/NFDD or any of the other few dozen 5* clunkers they are bound to get is not going to be able to steamroll end game content. So releasing another half a 5* over another month calendar is hardly going to toss the Contest out of balance. Dr. Zola
DusterN9ne wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » DrZola wrote: » Let's be honest: A new player who pulls a lone Luke/Cyke/AntMan/Loki/Gwen/HB/Groot/IP/ IF/Colossus/Mags/Kamala/Miles/Shulk/OML/NFDD or any of the other few dozen 5* clunkers they are bound to get is not going to be able to steamroll end game content. So releasing another half a 5* over another month calendar is hardly going to toss the Contest out of balance. Dr. Zola I've answered this in another Thread, but I'll do it again here. There are many different Player Levels that receive the same Calendar. They try to accommodate a variety of Rewards for all Players. I'm sure many would like every month to be 5* Shards, but that wouldn't be much use for newer Players starting out. They also have value. Just because 6*'s are coming doesn't mean they're going to hand out 5*s with every monthly. They change the Calendar every month to give a variety of Rewards all year long. They're not usually the same. This month has some great Rewards. They're literally giving all Players a chance to win a 5*. The problem is people heard the Announcement and expected it to rain 5*'s. Lol. Although I do agree with this statement to some degree my point is poor planning. Example would be if you are talking about all skill levels of players sure this makes a lot of sense however with the introduction of uncollected crystals there is absolutely no reason why they couldn't have created an uncollected calendar which varied in rewards based on the player's level.
DusterN9ne wrote: » True man but also realize that after youve become uncollected the majority of your roster is worthless. No one at that level is playing with 1 2 or 3 stars anymore. So the rewards should ultimately match your level.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » DusterN9ne wrote: » True man but also realize that after youve become uncollected the majority of your roster is worthless. No one at that level is playing with 1 2 or 3 stars anymore. So the rewards should ultimately match your level. Well, not necessarily. It's doable with R5's depending on your skill level. Check out The Analyzer. I hear what you're saying, but Act 5 is only one part of the game, and that doesn't make your Roster worthless. That's a view that the Player Base has because they're focused on 5*'s and now 6*'s. It would be hard to Grind the Arena without them. The majority of available, newer Champs are much more attainable and Dupable in 4* form. 6*'s aren't even playable yet and people have started counting everything else out. They won't be that common months down the road when they do become playable. It's my opinion that it's the source of the anxiousness. People are in such anticipation of them that they expect a 5* Roster that equals their 4* Roster, and that their 4* and 5* Rosters will be useless. Too much projection into the future based on announcements that were intended to be a notice of the long-term goals.
Kocheese wrote: » I actually have no 3 stars except a trio of maxed. There def should be levels. It' makes vets retired because all u pull is useless champs and the game becomes very boring. Even 4s I won't rank besides AA, Iceman, hype , voodoo is probably it.
Deadbyrd9 wrote: » So because one calendar had 5* shards you expect them all to have them? Just saying you could pull a 5* from the grand master crystal
DusterN9ne wrote: » I thought you guys were gonna make things easier to obtain 5 star shards yet this month we dont have any and also lost out on a weeks worth of Alliance wars to make it even less this month. Seems like something that couldve been planned out better. Can I get some other peoples thought on the subject?
DracoFire3000 wrote: » DusterN9ne wrote: » I thought you guys were gonna make things easier to obtain 5 star shards yet this month we dont have any and also lost out on a weeks worth of Alliance wars to make it even less this month. Seems like something that couldve been planned out better. Can I get some other peoples thought on the subject? Are you all too stupid to notice that you get 5,000 5star shards EVERY OTHER MONTH
Sungj wrote: » They put in 5k last month what more do you want, another 5k? People playing for 2 months should not just get a 5 star for doing nothing, they are limiting rewards in the calendars at a certain point because to lower end players rewards that are just good for top tier players are progression breaking for them. A free 5 star 2 months into playing would allow a new player to complete all content without having to had grinded any 4 stars or even any decent three stars. People ( not saying just you) need to see how things effect the game as a whole not just focus on what they want.
Degirmencioglu wrote: » They can have them. I'm tired of pulling Spidergwen, Rhino(12 times) Luke cage, and iron patriot, now I'm on a two crystal streak of pulling antman. Keep those shards. It's becoming more than an insult.
DrZola wrote: » Sungj wrote: » DrZola wrote: » Let's be honest, Sungj: A new player who pulls a lone Luke/Cyke/AntMan/Loki/Gwen/HB/Groot/IP/ IF/Colossus/Mags/Kamala/Miles/Shulk/OML/NFDD or any of the other few dozen 5* clunkers they are bound to get is not going to be able to steamroll end game content. So releasing another half a 5* over another month calendar would hardly throw the Contest out of balance. Dr. Zola Yes but what about the other half that pulls x-23, mordo, nightcrawler, moonknight, ultron, storm, cyclops, wintersoldier, hawkeye, yellow jacket,magik, guillotine, drax,, hulk, elektra, symbiote spiderman, rocket raccoon, agent venom, corssbones, beast etc. With the current pool more than half of the champions even unduped can carry a player who has only been playing for a few months through the entirety of act 4 as well as a clear of act 5.1 so thats over half of the beginner player base that was handed out a progression negating champion. With any of the champions I listed 3 stars would no longer be anywhere near a priority and four stars and would take a back seat as well. People who barely play but just login everyday would get progression it took regular players hard grinding to get not just had it handed to us. Most new players will have a tough time getting any of those champs past R2. And most of those champs at R2 would have little chance exploring Act 4 by themselves. I don't begrudge any new player their more rapid progression, but having a lone, unduped R2 5* is highly unlikely in my opinion to carry a player playing for a few months (with noob masteries and noob resources) through all the game content. Are you also against the ability of new players to "buy" 5*'s via the GMCs? Brand new players who decide to open the wallet a little can pop a set of 5*'s without doing anything other than spending. At least calendar rewards for everyone are way more egalitarian. Dr. Zola