@Kabam Miike I never post on this forum, but this has to be said. It’s Pretty s***** on you guys when half the country is getting laid off due to coronavirus and y’all can’t even put the new potions in the glory store for the F2P community? You guys claim you’re a “community” based company and you’re about the players, but all I see here with this move is another way for y’all to milk people. This just leaves another sour taste in people’s mouths when it comes to alliance events. Truly bad optics on your part. Total shame.
I have confirmed that the original Potions are useable in both AW and AQ. It was just a text error (which may have been around for a few years now), and will be fixed in the future.
Wording on older potions is “Alliance Quests”, plural, in which the “Quests” part I’m sure was just meant to be generic (any Alliance based stuff).
Never used to be an issue before now when they are actually making different versions for AQ vs AW. Note, the new style AQ one says the singular form “Alliance Quest” (not plural).
And note, even though the Blue Shield looks similar (maybe Kabam can change that symbol for the Old Style ones), the symbol is a little bigger and brighter on the new AQ specific ones. ** But main way to tell them apart (old vs new AQ specific ones) is the more pronounced all-encompassing ARMOR PLATING type of covering on the round potion (like what the Dungeon/Incursion potions have).
Comments
Never used to be an issue before now when they are actually making different versions for AQ vs AW. Note, the new style AQ one says the singular form “Alliance Quest” (not plural).
And note, even though the Blue Shield looks similar (maybe Kabam can change that symbol for the Old Style ones), the symbol is a little bigger and brighter on the new AQ specific ones.
** But main way to tell them apart (old vs new AQ specific ones) is the more pronounced all-encompassing ARMOR PLATING type of covering on the round potion (like what the Dungeon/Incursion potions have).