NEW AW: Playing against AI instead of other alliances

cherascheras Member Posts: 112 ★
edited May 2020 in General Discussion
Can i suggest NEW AW to Kabam

AW playing against other alliances is out (too many problems and so little rewards), let's introduce a NEW AW that play against AI, fair to every one.

New AW Rules:

Prestige 10000 matchup against Kabam's 10000 AI

Prestige 500 matchup against Kabam's 500 AI

2 hours placing defenders, 20 hours play, 1 week 7 wars, triple up rewards. (5 Defenders 3 Attacker3 won't be locked)

Comments

  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • cherascheras Member Posts: 112 ★
    Primmer79 said:

    So you're suggesting AQ, but we have to place a defense for an AI to randomly generate outcomes?

    Different to AQ.
    I call this NEW AW

    RULES:

    We place 5 defenders as usual, computer calculate the total prestiges placed and generate an opponent with similar prestige.

    I believe this is fair to everyone.
  • M1k0rinM1k0rin Member Posts: 605 ★★
    Well alot people rank up "not really good attacker champ but reliable defender" to place in defense. So, for me no. I think kabam should make less annoying node ore give back 2017 aw map
  • AzKicker316AzKicker316 Member Posts: 2,436 ★★★★★
    So the suggestion IS basically AQ but that the AI also fights our defenders?! So we would still be fighting AI in attack and then AI vs AI on our defense. That's a no from me.
  • LeNoirFaineantLeNoirFaineant Member Posts: 8,672 ★★★★★
    The cure here is worse than the disease. Playing other actual alliances is what makes war interesting. Removing this in order to "make it fair" removes the main thing that made us like war in the first place.
  • cherascheras Member Posts: 112 ★
    edited May 2020
    LeNoirFaineant said:

    The cure here is worse than the disease. Playing other actual alliances is what makes war interesting. Removing this in order to "make it fair" removes the main thing that made us like war in the first place.

    I did not say removing current AW, I suggest a NEW AW so that summoners earn more rewards and make the game more interesting 10000 vs 10000, 500 vs 500
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Thicco_ModeThicco_Mode Member Posts: 8,852 ★★★★★
    mcoccheras said:

    LeNoirFaineant said:

    The cure here is worse than the disease. Playing other actual alliances is what makes war interesting. Removing this in order to "make it fair" removes the main thing that made us like war in the first place.

    I did not say removing current AW, I suggest a NEW AW so that summoners earn more rewards and make the game more interesting 10000 vs 10000, 500 vs 500
    So then more of our champs would be unavailable? They should just increase rewards
  • AstronomicalAstronomical Member Posts: 26 ★
    War wouldn't be interesting anymore because you're meant to compete against other alliances otherwise it'd just be like AQ
  • Primmer79Primmer79 Member Posts: 2,968 ★★★★
    mcoccheras said:

    Primmer79 said:

    So you're suggesting AQ, but we have to place a defense for an AI to randomly generate outcomes?

    Different to AQ.
    I call this NEW AW

    RULES:

    We place 5 defenders as usual, computer calculate the total prestiges placed and generate an opponent with similar prestige.

    I believe this is fair to everyone.
    So you're suggesting AQ but based off who we choose? whats to stop me from placing 2* and fighting with 5*?

    Also, how is scoring done? AI fights our defense in AI? highest PI wins? but AI PI is based off our PI? so theyre equal?
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Destroy4589Destroy4589 Member Posts: 261 ★★★
    no
Sign In or Register to comment.