**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Comments
If you like the game as is that’s fine for you but don’t begrudge others their opinions as I’m sure you don’t appreciate it when other do it to you. If it doesn’t apply to you let it fly bro. Kabam doesn’t need you and the other “white knights” to defend them and quite frankly guys like you only distract deflect and derail conversations.
I'm also not advocating for niche match-ups in every scenario as sometimes this has proven to be TOO restrictive. But careful node design that makes one carefully select their roster before going into a quest is fun. I don't want to feel as if I'm just brute forcing my way through content with the same few champs.
There are far worse examples here on the forum that take the complete opposite side but are exactly the same point as what he's saying but you aren't tell those types to stop "pigeonholing". Why is it always a 1 sided street?
Even though Coat's post was clearly sarcastic, he isn't wrong. Raffster is wrong. There are a lot more champs than 10 that are needed or can be used to clear content. This whole post should have been closed right away.
It’s illegitimate to claim one counter to a path when there are numerous and varied counters. Even more so when you choose to highlight a champion whose at the lower end of options for that path because they fit a tier list.
It’s illegitimate to expect to be handed the same things other work or pay for.
It’s illegitimate to ignore options for changes in a schedule like changing paths.
It’s illegitimate to bring an atrocious counter to a fight when you have better options then complain about how bad the fight was when it was your bias which led to outcome.
There are countless options for most of the grievances being aired but people can’t be bothered to think. I pigeon holed nothing, the people complaining have pigeon holed the arguments to further an agenda.
Sorry to disrupt the echo chamber.
For me, it's not a big deal because it isn't a race, I'll get those "needed" (meaning desired for minimizing pots, revives and hassle, not literally needed) champs eventually and I won't bother with the content until I do.
Does this mean I win the game?
Even Archangle have become null-in-void to bleed and poison immune champs.
Avengers: Last Stand
With the threat of THANOS rising once more in The Contest, the people of The Battlerealm call upon the AVENGERS to save them! Harness the power of the original INFINITY STONES by completing the initial run of Quests, and then empower the original six Avengers one by one to defeat a final challenge and drive off The Children of Thanos!
Enjoy the champ.
Needed 7 revives.
Further to the subject, choosing the best Champs doesn't mean the rest are useless. That's entirely too religious with the God Tier List. Sure, some are on the lower end. There are a great deal more which are mid-range and even decent in terms of usefulness. There's always going to be a range of Champs and if your only focus is one specific list, you're not going to see any value at all in anything else. Do some need work? Sure. We'll never have an entire lineup of 200 "God Tier Champs'.