So diversity points are separated by BGs?
DarkestDestroyer
Member Posts: 2,887 ★★★★★
It seems that the system is broken.
Or if you place a Magik in bg1,2&3 you get points for 3 champs... but if they in the same bg only get it for 1 point?
Some ppl have way over 106 diversity score so it's surely per bg? Then added up afterwards right?
Or if you place a Magik in bg1,2&3 you get points for 3 champs... but if they in the same bg only get it for 1 point?
Some ppl have way over 106 diversity score so it's surely per bg? Then added up afterwards right?
0
Comments
I assumed that any alliance that included a red deadpool, a thanos, and a kang would almost automatically win every war under this new system if it was across entire alliance. But if it's per bg, then at least those without those champs can still potentially win.
on the pic was 70 unique defenders, but counts as 109.
If to believe my count (http://mbch.guide/en/champions/spisok-imeyushhixsya-chempionov/), even including Medusa - there only 106 unique playalable champions.
How is that happened? :-)
Magic :-)
they probably didn't pay much attention ... just decided to use the buzzword "diversity" thinking all the youngin's being force fed "diversity diversity diversity" in school would think it's the greatest thing in the world
So One Magik per ALLIANCE can be placed. You need 150 different champs to maximize diversity points.
(Now I have to go count champs)
Wrong.
Our sister alliance had 125 diverse champions. Not possible as the system was described. Yet something else broken.
Just cancel AW, give everyone winner rewards for each war they did this week and try again.
And this is from someone who won wars and would get nothing. I feel for those that did their best within the rules of the system and got shafted because it is broken. Defender diversity being bugged is a pretty huge issue as it takes the limit from 106 to 150 if you based your strategy on the word of Kabam.
Broken game is broken.
@Kabam Zibiit, nope. Not until we get an answer or response to the plethora of other threads about the failure that is the new alliance war.
..bruh is you blind? Look above your post and at half the posts in the last day, like c'mon
@Kabam Zibiit, why do we need to send you screen shots. Can you guys not even try this yourself on your own accounts?
You mods claim to play your own game. If this was true then you can easily see that diversity is per BG when you played AWS. Obviously, you don't play your own game or test anything at all.
Please, tell your leadership to stop being so damn cheap and spend $0 on testing.
In fact, it HAS to score like this. Otherwise, it is literally, LITERALLY, impossible to beat an alliance that doesn't place any defenses bc there aren't enough unique champs in the game.
Simple question you might think, well first reply was a link to @Kabam Miike post, I said that was wrong as we did not place 78 different champs, they then told me each unique champ was worth 50 points, I questioned that and was then gave the first link again, tearing hair out now asking HOW do you get to the 78 number, eventually they said they couldn't answer the question and it would have to passed on for an answer!!!!
I mean come on what the hell is going on when even they don't know
Oh and " unique" means 1 of a kind, not 75 mordos = 1 unique champ..... not unique lol
Here is a break down of our last aw
Bg1: 22 unique champs
Bg2: 25 unique champs
Bg3: 29 unique champs
Total: 76
Across all 3 bg's 38 unique champs
Our actual scoring after war had finished
Defender diversity 76.
Points 9,500
I have screen shots and full spread sheet to show all. So aw scoring is 100% broken and if I'm being totally honest you really need to look at all wars as alliances could have lost by following your rules and lost due to your mistake?
Well except for the 0 defender scenarios. Those were correct. Congratulations on knowing what zero is.