**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Comments
*To answer your edit. It’s random r3 because prior to the Abyss Nexus all of my, and most others (aside from people dropping odins on cavs), 6s were random. The 10 choice nexus gives a choice opportunity to players.
A pretty good idea was brought up that sending the nexus crystal in mail would be a good way around this.
We made rankups and awakenings with available information at the time. Odds of getting a new champion from crystals that actually existed at the time vs sitting on catalysts forever waiting for one. You can't say it's like champions getting added to the game bc that's absurd. New champs coming, pulling dupes from other crystals, etc... were all possibilities that people were aware of when they made a decision to use resources. Them manufacturing a crystal with at least near a 50% chance at getting a specific champ of a specific class and adding it to content we already completed was not something you can even remotely realistically expect people to factor in.
That's like us saying you should have expected the rewards to change and got it done sooner. Both were choices made with currently available information that have unforseen consequences at present. Just bc you lost something doesn't mean someone else didn't.
Get off your cross for a second jeez. You're not some super brain bc you waited to do content. You more than likely just weren't willing to grind or spend to do it or don't have the champs. Someone who did complete it isn't any better or worse for making that choice and the natural advantage from doing content early isn't something you get to try to twist to make yourself feel better or seem like some victim who singley was wronged.
Question is why do players demand they have their champion choice be influenced by their t5cc. The t5cc will come again soon but this champion choice will not.
Either way its still not ideal for the player and the content wasn't easy. It was long and challenging and rewards need to be increased in my opinion and not "moved".
And I'm not even sure how I have to keep repeating this but some, not saying you specifically, don't seem to understand. I'm not mad that I lost out on that choice, it absolutely would have been nice to have but I'm fine with living with my choices, nor am I happy about or support the shards being removed from future runs. Just stating another side of the situation. I still think that no matter what side you're sitting on it's a massive win
If Kabam just reduce 15k shards for future exploration without giving the new nexus crystal to people who completed 100% before. I don't think anyone would have much complain at all.
The problem of the situation solely on execution of the change.
Either not reducing the shards to future content explorer or not giving the extra nexus to people completing in the past.
We get 6* stones and gems from one time content that has already passed or through buying them, t5cc is in alliance events in addition that that one time content, while the t5cc is not significant at this very moment AQ and AW are being updated. AQ alone will have a new tier of modifiers which award t5cc. additionally book 2 is on the horizon while I can bank on t5cc being opened up in relation to its arrival I cannot bank on stones playing a large part.
Regardless of all that stones and gems at this point in time are severely restricted with no indication of an increase on the horizon and this places their value pretty damn high. They’ve also increased in price when sold, they’ve become more restrictive. The opposite is true of t5cc.
Awakening gems and signature stones are not likely to be soon or even comparable to the amount of t5cc over the course of the year.
You’re sorry I finished first? I’m sorry you didn’t? We both have advantages and disadvantages relating to those decisions. If I must live with my decisions it’s unfair to demand that you do not have to live with your decisions and that it’s unfair to you, all the while claiming everything is copasetic on my end when, that’s far from the truth.
Looks to me like Miike answers that. Appears to be that they want you to choose your champion independent of the t5cc factor.
I also decided since the evaluations themselves were subjective, I should make my own evaluation I could stand behind and calculate the odds based on that, which I did here: https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/comment/1258161/#Comment_1258161. That breaks the selections down a bit more granularly, with what I consider top choices for R3 and potentially valid but not top choices for R3, based on my own understanding of the champions (it is possible there are champs others would find R3-worthy but I lack the experience with them to be sure myself).
The most important thing for people to keep in mind when it comes to odds is everyone is getting this particular Nexus Abyss crystal once, which means there's no opportunity to average out the odds. When the odds are one in 50,000 of getting a horrible pull, that means it is very likely that approximately one out of every 50,000 players who do the Abyss will get that horrible pull. So when the odds are closer to one in 150, you have to ask how many players that translates to. One in 50,000 might be a couple in years, and it sucks to be them. But one in 143 probably means hundreds of players over a similar time scale. And even when I calculate the odds of a decent pull (based on my evaluation) being 98..8%, that means one out of every 91 players on average will be getting ten choices none of which I would consider R3 worthy.
98.9% is very good odds when you think about one player. One out of 91 is not very good odds when you think about what will happen to a thousand Abyss players.
What's a disadvantage is putting more space between you top prestige players with end game rosters and 100+ 6*s and us lower tier players. 15k 6* shards might not be valuable to you due to having an already extensive roster, but I've grinded my butt off for the past couple years and only have 20. Another shot at a featured 6* will benefit me ALOT more than it'll benefit you.
In future, don't use your resources for fear of getting better champs at a later date and stop crying, OR use them and be satisfied with your decision AND ACCEPT THE EXTRA 6* THAT YOU TOP TIER MOB GET THAT THE ONES WHO NEED IT MOST DON'T.
- again tell me why you was forced to R3 a champion ? Because of prestige right. Its **** system but no one forced you to do it.
- champions acquisition have always been random, this game is RNG based. A person can get a god tier as their first 6* or never get any decent champs in the first 20 pulls that's just how it goes. This is exactly what people have been complaining about which bought around this change.
- pigeon Chess, you are basically calling me ignorant. Not sure why someone would take that as an insult
- Let me break it down in the most simplistic form so you can discern. Player A gets 5 6* for completing content Player B gets 4 6* for doing same content. Is that fair ? The answer to this is no its not fair. not talking about the champions in question because they are random. Player B could pull 4 god tier champions. That is simply the nature of the game.
- Whats the bigger disadvantage not being able to rank up a certain champion straight away or having one less champion crystal at the same point in the game as others.
- You are also making out all of a sudden everyone completing abyss will be able to R3 which ever champ they want
when there are a number of scenarios that could happen
1) You get the new crystal and manage to awaken or get a champion you like but because you already used your T5CC you have to wait.
2) A new player gets new crystal and gets who they wanted but the T5CC doesn't give him what they needs to R3, they have to wait.
3) Another player who also completed Abyss prior to change who picked a class based on T5CC they have, gets champion they want and can R3 them.
4) Another new player finishes abyss and gets new crystal and gets champion they want and also gets T5CC to R3 that champion.
5) Also a player could not get any decent champions out of the 10 and therefore doesn't want to R3 any champ
so how is it you can say every player to complete abyss going forward is suddenly going to have this huge advantage not available to those who already completed abyss. They have the same advantage as people who didn't do abyss until after 6.4 which is one of being able to make their choice based on a larger picture.
You keep talking about how if this crystal was around it would of influenced your decision on your rank ups. Of course it would of just like pulling a certain champ at the time would of. Just like doing abyss after opening 100 6* crystals. It would also of been a non issue as you may have not got anyone better or awakened the champion you wanted to use resources on. But ultimately using the generic AG was a conscious decision on your part so because you used it on a lesser champion you think that it is just cause to take away 15k shards from people who haven't done it ? That is the summation of your argument that its unfair on you because YOU used your generic gem on a unfavorable champion. There would of been players who were lucky enough to have those God tier champs everyone wants when they completed it who have no issue. There is those who decided to hold onto their resources and since completion have managed to get a champion they are happy to use resources on.
Nothing you have said or offered as an argument explain how denying people 15k shards makes it fairer then leaving the rewards as is. Most of the arguments you have presented have been in the sense what would you rather have the ability to pick a champion or 15k shards. However this isn't whats happening because you are getting the 15k shards and the ability to pick a champion.
and that's the last i'm going to say on the matter.
It’s neither here nor there but I’m also disadvantaged from not buying every sig stone offer and end game deal.
While I do buy most sig stone offers I buy zero end game offers outside of the major holiday events.
My six star roster is not as extensive by comparison to others in my “Tier” which makes the options of gems and stones all that more valuable to me.
It’s wrong to undercut someone with a game changing adjustment in content rewards that offer a significant advantage after the fact. And doubly wrong to excuse it “because 15k shards.”
@Championcritic in a situation where both parties have been gifted advantages over the other Through no fault of their own, handicapping them in differing ways does offer some semblance of equality.
Is it a crystal that i can leave in my mailbox and just not claim it until july 4th? Or the minute i claim it, it will ask me for which class?
I'm thinking i won't touch the mail at all until july 4th.