**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Matchmaking Discussion [Merged Threads]
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Your fate is not only in your hands. It is also affected by what everyone else does. Any alliance with an easier path upward is automatically pushing everyone else downward. It just happens invisibly, and alliances concerned about being pushed downward now by the new match making system have to understand that if they are being pushed downward now, that means they were invisibly being pushed upwards before, and other alliances were invisibly pushed downward just as much as they are now. And there's not much anyone can do about it, because of the zero-sum nature of war. The only way to neutralize that pain is by giving it to someone else. Any reward you get is a reward someone else is not getting.
So when an alliance says a war is "unfair" the only way to take away that unfair loss is to hand it to someone else. The only way to hand them back the season rewards they think they are losing is to take them away from someone else. If an alliance was in Gold 1 last season and they think they will end up in Gold 2 this season and they think that's unfair, if I wave a magic wand and put them back into Gold 1, I am pushing someone else down into Gold 2. No matter how the magic wand does it, that's just the nature of how rewards work.
So I wouldn't, even if it was magically possible to do.
"You guys got too high rewards for seasons."
The mentality is not that they got more than they should for a long time. No no.
"They are being robbed their hard earned rewards from kabam." Its just easier to belive this fake story. Its delusional ofc.
But its a hard pill to swallow that you actuly didnt earn your rewards.
Im in the same boat btw. We finished 2 x P1 with ~30 million alliance. We will prob get blasted in some of the coming matches. But its fair that way.
And on the other side a lower allaince with 1k- 2k pi players
Well below is our alliance results.
We’re a 30m top500 AQ alliance. What’s the worst we could possibly be in war? Top 1500? 3000? From the last few seasons, I would’ve sworn the entire pool of alliances was 25m rating groups coasting at low tiers.
Alliance
On a side note, if you said the old system was fair, would you say the new one is unfair for lower players when the war ratings are relatively stable? Let's say if the season is over and everyone is "where they should be' according to the war rating rankings, which system do you think is better for all players, especially the non-whales who are progressing? If both systems were at a balance, or as balanced as each system could be, which do you think would be better for the game. I genuinely want to know what you think, and I apologize in advance if i sound snide or anything like that. I just want to know where your problems are with the system, whether it's this transition phase or how matchmaking is based off war rating.
Forget the fact that the bigger guys could crush the smaller guys. That is a comparison that shouldn't have come into the situation. Look at one side fighting Opponents equal to what THEY are bringing to the table. That is fair. It's fair for the little guys and it's fair for the bigger guys. The Matches themselves were fair. I'm sorry, but no argument to the contrary is going to convince me the bigger guys are working harder because what they're working with is also stronger.
We all know what this was about. The Top wanted to watch them fall, and here we are with an open season of slaughter. That's what this has always been about. The Rewards could have been resolved differently. It's not about that. Some people think these Alliances owe them the pleasure of watching them fail.
Why should a 20 mill alliance get master rewards well dying 40x a war. Well a 40 mill alliance gets plat 3 rewards dying only 5-10x.
When in all reality if the 20 mil were to fight the 40 mil. The 40 mil would easily walk through the defense with 0 deaths.
There is no good way to correct this. Time is the only thing that can fix this.
Matchups are a result of the war ratings being so out of whack For so long. you can only focus on a few crazy results which are unfair but completely justified now that we see how broken the previous system was, and we all know they will be fixed soon. Every one of these pictures will be less likely in one war, because the losers are going to drop and the winners are going to climb. Problem Is you are trying to say my alliance which has suffered from
The broken system doesn’t deserve to get the rewards we did before the broken system was put in place, and will get now it has been gone, focusing on the fix as it happens and before it’s been finished is always going to be problematic, failing to acknowledge
Something was wrong which lead to this fix being needed is obtuse and close minded
You say they were both fair matchups as the strong level alliance had the same nodes and all that as the low level alliance and that when it came to the defenders... well they had stronger attackers to deal with them and that made it fair.
Now seems fair to you, low level alliance vs low level alliance with appropriate attackers and defenders for that level of alliance is the same as strong alliance vs strong alliance with attacker and defenders for that level of alliance. Both are fair and whoever has a higher percentage of wins over a season of these matchups should be higher in your opinion. Correct?
However I don't think you are fully grasping what the strong level alliance actually faces and how compared to the low level alliance it actually isn't equal to what they face.
A low level alliance can have a 5* r4 Thing (sig20) as a boss (completely possible with how fast players can advance now and pick up a handful of 5* coupled with calendar or event awakening gems). Someone on the attacking side could have a 5* r3-4 stealth spidy as their top champ and have good chance of soloing that Thing boss (even without stealthy) in the 3 minute time limit.
Now compare that to what a strong alliance might face, they can come up against a 6* r2-3 thing with a high signature. There will probably be someone in the alliance with a 5* r5 stealth spidy or possibly a 6* r2 version.
The 5* r3-4 stealth vs a 5* r4 Thing (low sig) is in no way the same as 5* r5 (or 6*r2) stealth vs a 6* r2-3 Thing (hig sig) in the same time limit.
Just because the stronger alliance has stronger champs that does not mean dealing with the stronger defenders is equal to a low level alliance attacker dealing with an equally lower defender on the same exact node. Factor in sig levels, time limits and the stronger alliance has a much more difficult task ahead of them.
Your argument that these stronger alliances simply aren't winning enough compared to these lower level alliances, to which you believe have equally corresponding difficulties in opponents, and thus don't deserve to be moving up the ranks is actually insulting, inconsiderate and plain selfish.
The whinging in this thread is very entertaining. The bottom line is that those of us that have had our war rankings suppressed are now ecstatic that we get a chance to compete with the weaker alliances that have been protected and not defending their rankings against stronger alliances.
I could not care less about 8k P1 alliances getting steamrolled - I don't take any special pleasure in seeing people have to fight an unwinnable AW, but I am glad we will finally get a chance to see how our alliance truly stacks up against the rest of the competition. We didn't get the unbalanced matchup that some of the others here posted about, but we still won our first war pretty handily. The only thing that made me "happy" about that was the fact that we got extra points from our obviously weaker adversary leaving 35 defenders up. A few more wars like that and we should get a big boost in the standings - then we'll go up against balanced competition for fair rewards and everyone will be happy.
Except for the 8K alliances that were getting P1 rewards that will now be scuffling for G1. I suppose they won't be happy. But they can invest the same amount of time and resources into the game that the rest of us have, build a deep roster of 5/65 and get some 6* R3 from AoL or Act 6 and then start competing again for the rewards they've been earning at the expense of stronger alliances who were unfairly penalized by matchmaking heavily weighting prestige ratings.