StJoe wrote: »
If I have a minute I might have a closer look but - no disrespect - I have a feeling your game theory may be flawed You don't eliminate strategies by the number of wins and losses against other strategies but solely on the principle of being dominated. i.e. one strategy is worse than another regardless the move of your opponent. You can factor in cost, information etc. But just saying one strategy wins more often than another does not allow you to eliminate one or the other.
JJW wrote: »
AW2.0 is not problematic because of the introduction of Diversity, nor is it the point score system per-se.
The problem with AW2.0 is that the design is such that there are no strategic options for any of us, so we will all by necessity choose the exact same tactic.
JJW wrote: »
You could shift some points around, you could restore defender kills, you could redraw the map a little - all pretty easy things to do. The problem is that if Kabam does not fully consider the consequences of the little changes that they make then I, or someone like me, will quickly write an optimization formula and we will be right back where we are.
© 2021 MARVEL. MARVEL CONTEST OF CHAMPIONS SOFTWARE © 2021 KABAM GAMES, INC., A NETMARBLE COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.