Dropfaith wrote: » Playing smarter is using the system that wins..
Dropfaith wrote: » DD2 wrote: » Dropfaith wrote: » Playing smarter is using the system that wins.. Yes, but the new system sucks and is a giant drain on players. And it's not fun, and it makes no real world sense. K being mathematical and smarter actually makes more real world sense but to each their own I guess keep losing by being the "smart allaince"
DD2 wrote: » Dropfaith wrote: » Playing smarter is using the system that wins.. Yes, but the new system sucks and is a giant drain on players. And it's not fun, and it makes no real world sense.
Dropfaith wrote: » DD2 wrote: » Dropfaith wrote: » DD2 wrote: » Dropfaith wrote: » Playing smarter is using the system that wins.. Yes, but the new system sucks and is a giant drain on players. And it's not fun, and it makes no real world sense. K being mathematical and smarter actually makes more real world sense but to each their own I guess keep losing by being the "smart allaince" We're maximizing our odds of winning under the new system, but it's terrible and not fun. If Kabam is trying take the fun out of this game they're doing a great job. I enjoy wars more it's not longer oh look a magic on every node yawn. Yes they could make nodes harder but that's ot really. This is far better then facing the same five champs on every node every single war.
DD2 wrote: » Dropfaith wrote: » DD2 wrote: » Dropfaith wrote: » Playing smarter is using the system that wins.. Yes, but the new system sucks and is a giant drain on players. And it's not fun, and it makes no real world sense. K being mathematical and smarter actually makes more real world sense but to each their own I guess keep losing by being the "smart allaince" We're maximizing our odds of winning under the new system, but it's terrible and not fun. If Kabam is trying take the fun out of this game they're doing a great job.
roastedbagel wrote: » Kabam - someone higher up needs to be seeing this if they aren't. AW is ruined. It's not fun anymore. When you take away the very CORE aspect of a game - being fun - you risk a very, very bad turnout. The number of players who are simply unhappy is very alarming. Again, I hope the higher ups are looped in right now. This cannot continue. Losing because of diversity is a terrible element to our enjoyment of this game.
JJW wrote: » roastedbagel wrote: » Kabam - someone higher up needs to be seeing this if they aren't. AW is ruined. It's not fun anymore. When you take away the very CORE aspect of a game - being fun - you risk a very, very bad turnout. The number of players who are simply unhappy is very alarming. Again, I hope the higher ups are looped in right now. This cannot continue. Losing because of diversity is a terrible element to our enjoyment of this game. I have been assured that the AW Design team is monitoring this thread. The nonsense posted don't help this swamp, but they are reviewing these posts.
DD2 wrote: » JJW wrote: » roastedbagel wrote: » Kabam - someone higher up needs to be seeing this if they aren't. AW is ruined. It's not fun anymore. When you take away the very CORE aspect of a game - being fun - you risk a very, very bad turnout. The number of players who are simply unhappy is very alarming. Again, I hope the higher ups are looped in right now. This cannot continue. Losing because of diversity is a terrible element to our enjoyment of this game. I have been assured that the AW Design team is monitoring this thread. The nonsense posted don't help this swamp, but they are reviewing these posts. Can you tell them to FULLY re-institute the previous scoring system? No one likes the garbage that we have now.
Dwark wrote: » This basically sums it up, who should have won the war here?
RagamugginGunner wrote: » Hey dev team that is totally following this thread, do you realize how much work it is to keep track of the rosters for 30 flipping people to max diversity? Do you even think about what you do to your players before implementing garbage like this?