new AW challenger map node 15

Carmel1Carmel1 Member Posts: 634 ★★★
node 15 in challenger map (aggression armor + enhanced armor), shouldn't a well time block with Corvus remove the passive armors against IMIW?
i fought him on that node and well time block didn't remove any armor (it remove the flow so i know my block was fine). he got up to 22 armors!!
i'm quite sure that it used to work on the previous map when IMIW was the middle mini on the same node.
working as intended or bug?

Comments

  • Eb0ny-O-M4wEb0ny-O-M4w Member Posts: 14,027 ★★★★★
    That strategy doesn't work against "Aggression:Armor" nodes.

    Corvus Glaive applies an armor break debuff on a well-timed block. For each armor effect on the opponent it will apply an additional armor break debuff.

    By nature, armor break debuffs remove armor up buffs, but not passive armor's. While you will be able to apply armor break debuffs, the passive armor's will not be removed, and will still be there.

    Some champions with a passive armor ability have an additional text on their abilities, stating that the armor will be removed if affected by an armor break debuff. Some examples are Killmonger and Iron Man (Infinity War). While you are able to remove their personal passive armor's with an armor break debuff, the same won't happen against "Agression:Armor" nodes.

    So, it's working as intended here
  • Carmel1Carmel1 Member Posts: 634 ★★★
    as far as i remember it used to work before also vs passive buff.
    Corvus description says "armor affect"
  • Eb0ny-O-M4wEb0ny-O-M4w Member Posts: 14,027 ★★★★★
    "Passive buffs" are not a thing in the game. Either is a buff, or a passive ability. An "effect" can include both.

    And you read it right. Corvus Glaive does apply an armor break debuff for each armor up effect on the opponent, including passive armor. But since the armor up is a passive in the first place, and not an armor up buff, it won't be removed due to an armor break debuff.
  • BendyBendy Member Posts: 6,561 ★★★★★
    Corvus armor break dont remove aggression armor passives only iwim passive armors
  • Carmel1Carmel1 Member Posts: 634 ★★★
    Bendy said:

    Corvus armor break dont remove aggression armor passives only iwim passive armors

    so why is that, if both are passive?
  • BendyBendy Member Posts: 6,561 ★★★★★
    Carmel1 said:

    Bendy said:

    Corvus armor break dont remove aggression armor passives only iwim passive armors

    so why is that, if both are passive?
    Node for aggression armor always stays since release against armor breaks like that only passive armors from iwim actually go by armor breaks its just how effects of passives go also could mean aggression armor passives are a different kind of effect
  • Carmel1Carmel1 Member Posts: 634 ★★★
    Bendy said:

    Carmel1 said:

    Bendy said:

    Corvus armor break dont remove aggression armor passives only iwim passive armors

    so why is that, if both are passive?
    Node for aggression armor always stays since release against armor breaks like that only passive armors from iwim actually go by armor breaks its just how effects of passives go also could mean aggression armor passives are a different kind of effect
    thank you.
    So we have "buff", "passive buff" and "something in between".. everything is clear now... this is great...
  • Eb0ny-O-M4wEb0ny-O-M4w Member Posts: 14,027 ★★★★★
    Carmel1 said:

    Bendy said:

    Carmel1 said:

    Bendy said:

    Corvus armor break dont remove aggression armor passives only iwim passive armors

    so why is that, if both are passive?
    Node for aggression armor always stays since release against armor breaks like that only passive armors from iwim actually go by armor breaks its just how effects of passives go also could mean aggression armor passives are a different kind of effect

    So we have "buff", "passive buff" and "something in between"..
    There are BUFFS, which are described as active abilities.
    There are other abilities which are described as PASSIVE, meaning they aren't buffs).
    For the third one, is something that doesn't apply here in this scenario, and we don't have much information on it yet
  • KaybursKayburs Member Posts: 9
    So who are you guys using against IMIW on that node?
  • This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.