How I think it should have been handled
Hoitado
Member Posts: 3,707 ★★★★★
To be clear this isn’t me against Kabam it’s just how I would’ve have handled it and in the end this is Kabam’s game and they can do whatever they want
I think that players should have not been banned FROM THE GAME they should be banned from AW AQ and Arena as that is where they can cheat and get good rewards off of it but they should be allowed to do story content and log in to the game as well as help with Arena and Energy request. Like this anyone who spent money on daily cards and other things will still be able to claim their rewards. And also like this there is no advantage to the EXPLOITERS because the rewards are getting taken away but
I’m glad Kabam took action but I think they should have done it differently as it is both side's fault
I think that players should have not been banned FROM THE GAME they should be banned from AW AQ and Arena as that is where they can cheat and get good rewards off of it but they should be allowed to do story content and log in to the game as well as help with Arena and Energy request. Like this anyone who spent money on daily cards and other things will still be able to claim their rewards. And also like this there is no advantage to the EXPLOITERS because the rewards are getting taken away but
I’m glad Kabam took action but I think they should have done it differently as it is both side's fault
3
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Imagine that, a game that people have spent a lot of money on actually just working as intended (even if they don't communicate what is meant to take place) and not being taken away from them for a mistake that wasn't theirs and wasn't made clear...
Imagine.
What you do is more important than what you feel. We're not sh*tting on people who want more things. Hell, I want more too. That doesn't mean I'm going to act on my urges. Saying that it's human nature (or a learned human trait) does nothing but provide an excuse for doing wrong.
It was the first day of the quest and to many of us it was unclear that we were breaking a rule. A 7-day ban is just too severe a punishment for an unclear rule on the first fat of a quest in which not all of us were clear on how the rewards would work.
Kabam is in the wrong. They made a mistake by uploading content with bugs and instead of looking for accountability within the company, they took their anger on the players in a vindictive, self-righteous, ethically judgemental, hot-tempered decision that should be withdrawn immediately.
I have never cheated in anything in my life and I refused to be called a cheater by Kabam just because they want to shift the focus of the discussion away from their own mistake.
Georgios Feidas
In-game name GF 2211
2) Even if you did run it 1 or 2 extra times, they pardoned you.
3) If you ran it more times, it's likely that you would've known it was a bug. Anyone who thinks that they could keep running a quest over and over an unlimited amount of times for 1k 6* shards without it being a bug is, to put it frankly, stupid.
4) They acknowledged that it was their mistake, but that also doesn't give you the right to exploit either.
5) Their decision wasn't ethically judgmental. It was well within the rights they had laid out to you in their TOS. Any violation of the TOS can be punished (although they don't always, that's for another discussion).
- Kabam Terms of Service
We aim to keep a balance of fairness in The Contest for all players. However, when players choose to exploit a bug or use an unintended method to gain an advantage over others in the game, they ultimately affect the balance that we're trying to maintain. In such situations, we feel it's necessary to punish any offending players for their actions. Regardless of whether or not you agree with how we choose to punish those players, it's not something which is up for discussion or debate on these Forums.
Thank you for your understanding as we work to keep The Contest fair for everyone.