Bypassing armour and lowering that further are two different things. English isn't my first language, but im definitely not bad at it Think about it logically. Corvus has a true damage buff which ignores armour and resistances. So when Corvus has this buff, no matter how many armour ups the opponent has, it’s essentially 0 when Corvus attacks. You are now saying that inflicting an armour break then lowers armour further? So If armour is essentially 0 due to true damage, the armour break makes it a negative armour rating?!?! Why dont you know armour rating can go into negatives? Haven't you ever gone past 25 hits in breakthrough node? We are not talking about going intoi negatives, and this is the first time, after I brought it, that you mentioned it. I am talking of negatives. And the shamir guy doesn't know about negatives. I wasnt telling you.
Bypassing armour and lowering that further are two different things. English isn't my first language, but im definitely not bad at it Think about it logically. Corvus has a true damage buff which ignores armour and resistances. So when Corvus has this buff, no matter how many armour ups the opponent has, it’s essentially 0 when Corvus attacks. You are now saying that inflicting an armour break then lowers armour further? So If armour is essentially 0 due to true damage, the armour break makes it a negative armour rating?!?! Why dont you know armour rating can go into negatives? Haven't you ever gone past 25 hits in breakthrough node? We are not talking about going intoi negatives, and this is the first time, after I brought it, that you mentioned it.
Bypassing armour and lowering that further are two different things. English isn't my first language, but im definitely not bad at it Think about it logically. Corvus has a true damage buff which ignores armour and resistances. So when Corvus has this buff, no matter how many armour ups the opponent has, it’s essentially 0 when Corvus attacks. You are now saying that inflicting an armour break then lowers armour further? So If armour is essentially 0 due to true damage, the armour break makes it a negative armour rating?!?! Why dont you know armour rating can go into negatives? Haven't you ever gone past 25 hits in breakthrough node?
Bypassing armour and lowering that further are two different things. English isn't my first language, but im definitely not bad at it Think about it logically. Corvus has a true damage buff which ignores armour and resistances. So when Corvus has this buff, no matter how many armour ups the opponent has, it’s essentially 0 when Corvus attacks. You are now saying that inflicting an armour break then lowers armour further? So If armour is essentially 0 due to true damage, the armour break makes it a negative armour rating?!?!
Bypassing armour and lowering that further are two different things. English isn't my first language, but im definitely not bad at it
Just a doubt, shouldn't having armour breaks actually increase damage?? Im new to the game, please help me with the some good advice. CG already bypasses armor, so armor breaks wont increase his damage unless his charges are down. Well this is what you said. And this is wrong. Because you're not taking anything into consideration. Just "charges". He can do it, against duck, skull, ironman iw at the very beginning of the fight
Just a doubt, shouldn't having armour breaks actually increase damage?? Im new to the game, please help me with the some good advice. CG already bypasses armor, so armor breaks wont increase his damage unless his charges are down.
Just a doubt, shouldn't having armour breaks actually increase damage?? Im new to the game, please help me with the some good advice.
Just a doubt, shouldn't having armour breaks actually increase damage??
@Lormif , it’s like Howard the duck has 8 armour up buffs in start of a fight(if I’m not wrong) and then when Corvus parries him, all of them are converted to armour break buffs. When you can have negative values, it makes sense that converting 8 armour ups to armour breaks will increase the damage significantly, doesn’t it??☺️