Throne Breaker Title Discussion [Merged Threads]

1343537394055

Comments

  • This content has been removed.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,187 ★★★★★

    And since you take his posts as gospel let him contradict you in his own words.
    If you want to be literal, then "no one" is an absolute, yes. I retract the word no one. I fail to see what that does for the point I was making.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,187 ★★★★★
    H3t3r said:

    Fun content over extremely hard content anyday
    To be fair, having seen Act 7, I appreciate the balance. I think appropriately hard and fun is a reasonable goal. I don't think it's impossible to merge the two. I think there's a danger in leaning too much to either side and sacrificing the other. Only, there's always going to be a Sadist who thinks everything is too easy. Lol.
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,106 ★★★★★

    To be fair, having seen Act 7, I appreciate the balance. I think appropriately hard and fun is a reasonable goal. I don't think it's impossible to merge the two. I think there's a danger in leaning too much to either side and sacrificing the other. Only, there's always going to be a Sadist who thinks everything is too easy. Lol.
    i'm not so sure it's possible, cav difficulty was fun but SUPER easy for endgame players, and 7.1 is also the same, super super easy but fun content
  • CoatHang3rCoatHang3r Member Posts: 4,965 ★★★★★

    If you want to be literal, then "no one" is an absolute, yes. I retract the word no one. I fail to see what that does for the point I was making.
    Yes when making blanket statements that claim to be literal, it’s important to be literal. Ffs
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,187 ★★★★★

    Yes when making blanket statements that claim to be literal, it’s important to be literal. Ffs
    Hello forest, meet trees.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,187 ★★★★★

    i'm not so sure it's possible, cav difficulty was fun but SUPER easy for endgame players, and 7.1 is also the same, super super easy but fun content
    That's the point of adjusting it to increasingly difficult within the context of Story, but not necessarily the most challenging for people who have done every challenge possible. Some people are just beyond most of what the game offers. Only, using them as the bar without considering progress comes at a detriment to others.
  • CoatHang3rCoatHang3r Member Posts: 4,965 ★★★★★

    It was quite literally taking Story into a place no one could grow into.

    If you want to be literal, then "no one" is an absolute, yes. I retract the word no one. I fail to see what that does for the point I was making.

    Hello forest, meet trees.
    Going to assume you’re trolling at this point. You literally were the one claiming to be literal in your statement not I.
  • This content has been removed.
  • WorknprogressWorknprogress Member Posts: 7,233 ★★★★★
    Mcord117 said:

    The focus should be fun and challenging. The issue is that not all can be fun and challenging to all. I am not sure I know what the answer is. The haves and the have nots are so far apart it is near impossible to see how to satisfy both.

    If only they could do something like add a title that segmented off the playerbase some more so that content could be more accurately targeted at some point.....
  • CoatHang3rCoatHang3r Member Posts: 4,965 ★★★★★
    Mcord117 said:

    The focus should be fun and challenging. The issue is that not all can be fun and challenging to all. I am not sure I know what the answer is. The haves and the have nots are so far apart it is near impossible to see how to satisfy both.

    They could separate us with a progression based title allowing them to tailor content for the further progressed. Oh wait.
  • edited September 2020
    This content has been removed.
  • CoatHang3rCoatHang3r Member Posts: 4,965 ★★★★★
    Mcord117 said:

    Ok big guys. Let me know when this difficulty comes out. I will own my words if I am wrong, but if you believe that is the motives of this title and that this content is forth coming then I also have a bridge to sell you.

    To be clear I 1000% agree with both of you if thrown breaker difficulty starts in October or November or even December. Hell although it is a bit odd that someone who 100% act 6 can’t play act 7 I will even agree with you if they gate that. They won’t and both of you know that, but whatever. As I said before, by the time they release gated content to this title the gap they claim to be fixing will be just as wide as it is today

    I don’t think you quite grasp the possibilities that a newer titled directed specifically at people with rank 3s has. It does not need to be a separate quest, it can be done within the quest itself, see 4* cavalier challenge.
  • This content has been removed.
  • PolygonPolygon Member Posts: 5,273 ★★★★★
    Mcdonalds said:

    Cyber Monday is gonna be a bad time

    You mean for those that arent TB?
  • PolygonPolygon Member Posts: 5,273 ★★★★★

    Were you just given Uncollected and Cavalier? Oh... you weren't. Huh. I guess you'll just have to earn it like the other 2 titles.
    Dont bother commenting if you’re going to spew nonsense, I was offering a solution that could have benefited those that got the bottom end of the stick here
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,187 ★★★★★
    edited September 2020

    Going to assume you’re trolling at this point. You literally were the one claiming to be literal in your statement not I.
    Apparently you've never heard of literal being an expression. Ever see The Kardashians or Chef Ramsay? Regardless, I amended my original claim, so at this point you're just arguing for the sake of arguing. There was a point I was making. You apparently ignored it. Literally.
  • This content has been removed.
  • CoatHang3rCoatHang3r Member Posts: 4,965 ★★★★★

    Apparently you've never heard of literal being an expression. Ever see The Kardashians or Chef Ramsay? Regardless, I amended my original claim, so at this point you're just arguing for the sake of arguing. There was a point I was making. You apparently ignored it. Literally.
    Just take your licks, unless you want people to play Mad libs with your posts, I wonder if they’d make more or less sense? using the kardashians and chef Ramsey (No I don’t watch them) as reference for the use of “quite literally” explains a lot I suppose.

    Btw if we apply your amendment and omit the use of no one your comment reads “ It was quite literally taking Story into a place could grow into.” That makes no sense so I guess the point was you were evidencing your claim with nonsense?
  • RU11011RU11011 Member Posts: 880 ★★★★
    I don't know how good of an idea this is, but why not put fragment selectors or crystals in 7.1? Say there's a 5% selector at the end of each quest in 7.1, you'll end up with 30% from chapter completion by itself. Coupled with Cavalier exploration and alliance events, an active player should have no trouble getting a t5cc to rank 3 a champion. It's not a perfect solution, since some people will argue that they don't have a champion worthy of rank 3, but to me it seems fair.

    Even better, you can create a larger gap between Cavaliers and Thronebreakers by keeping the selectors behind 100% completion of quests. I say quests because it'll give more of an incentive to collect rewards by exploration, similar to how Cavalier difficulty rewards were structured.

    I'm only at 6.3, so I'm not sure if this idea is terrible or not. Maybe someone with more experience comment on this? It's just a rough idea, but offering t5cc fragments in 7.1 allows players to both progress further in story and in title progression. It could be offered for completion alone, but locking it behind 100% quest completion will incentivise chapter exploration to allow further progression.

    This would only partially solve the issue of acquiring t5cc, so people who don't want to rank up "bad" champions, or people who got super unlucky would still fall behind. And the solution would only really benefit those who don't wish to complete Abyss or explore Act 6 immediately. I don't think that the R3 gate is a bad idea, so if Kabam focuses on more chances to form a t5cc in 7.1, it could make it just a little bit easier.
  • This content has been removed.
  • CoatHang3rCoatHang3r Member Posts: 4,965 ★★★★★
    MetalJake said:

    When purchase prices are dependent on progression titles saying “you are under no pressure to....” is tone deaf and an insult to all who spend even a dollar or real money in this video game. Your under no pressure, just pay more for the same exact thing until you get a 6 star your content taking to rank 3 is a slap in the face. I did 6.4 completion the first week it was available and my best 6 star is awakened Masacre. He’s a **** champion for serious content and will be the same garbage champ at rank 3 for the content that matters.... I did the first part of the 2 requirements with 5/65 and rank 2/35 6 stars but I’m NOT GOOD ENOUGH in kabams eyes unless I can afford to whale out on thier over priced fragment deals or if I can’t WASTE a ENTIRE t5cc on a non worthy champion
    Can you give me an example of purchase prices being dependent on titles?
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,187 ★★★★★

    Just take your licks, unless you want people to play Mad libs with your posts, I wonder if they’d make more or less sense? using the kardashians and chef Ramsey (No I don’t watch them) as reference for the use of “quite literally” explains a lot I suppose.

    Btw if we apply your amendment and omit the use of no one your comment reads “ It was quite literally taking Story into a place could grow into.” That makes no sense so I guess the point was you were evidencing your claim with nonsense?
    Are you that bored for an argument? I'm moving on. You can amuse yourself.
  • TheTalentsTheTalents Member Posts: 2,257 ★★★★★
    After more time thinking about it. The force rankup sucks but most players who can complete act 6 most likely have a t5cc at full. So I no longer have an issue with this. One forced rankup isn't the end of the world. It could've been much worse. Believe it or not 100% of act 6 is much harder than 1 r3 6 star.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,995 ★★★★★
    GagoH said:

    Dont bother commenting if you’re going to spew nonsense, I was offering a solution that could have benefited those that got the bottom end of the stick here
    Oh ok. Let me know when you offer a solution, cause all I see is nonsense.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,187 ★★★★★
    edited September 2020

    After more time thinking about it. The force rankup sucks but most players who can complete act 6 most likely have a t5cc at full. So I no longer have an issue with this. One forced rankup isn't the end of the world. It could've been much worse. Believe it or not 100% of act 6 is much harder than 1 r3 6 star.

    It's not really a forced Rank Up. It's just a requirement for the Title. When people have one, they will get it. There's no force or urgency.
  • FrnkieloFrnkielo Member Posts: 311 ★★
    This title is designed for true current endgame players..if you have 100 percented the abyss and 100 percented act 6 you have been in this game long enough to have many many 6 stars and most of these players have multiple rank 3 champs..this is who it is designed for and it’s about time there is separation between those who just became cavalier and those who have finished all content in the game
  • ButtehrsButtehrs Member Posts: 7,447 ★★★★★
    edited September 2020
    I think my one suggestion is this time dont wait 2 years for a throne breaker eq difficulty.
Sign In or Register to comment.