Throne Breaker Title Discussion [Merged Threads]

1353638404155

Comments

  • PolygonPolygon Member Posts: 5,259 ★★★★★
    Nakuul said:

    Then people will have to decide which they value more. A T5CC or the deals. Not a difficult concept.

    What if the player was stoked and grinding arena for months before only to be shafted cause they were short a few thousand fragments and had to just settle for the Cav offers?
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,106 ★★★★★
    GagoH said:

    What if the player was stoked and grinding arena for months before only to be shafted cause they were short a few thousand fragments and had to just settle for the Cav offers?
    No matter the requirements someone will be “shafted”
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • CrcrcrcCrcrcrc Member Posts: 8,007 ★★★★★
    This could be interesting. No act 7 until 1.5 mil rating, no final boss access without r4 6*(just ideas). It makes you have to have enhanced your roster to get to the good stuff.
  • Campo4Campo4 Member Posts: 141
    I bet Kabam wanted this new progression level to come out with Act 7 chapter 1 which probably originally would have been out by Oct 1. Was delayed due to the good feedback from the beta. Very glad btw of the changes to Act 7.

    Now they had to improvise to get the progression level out before Black Friday offers.

    Truth is, there will be many people screwed by RNG, but I do know most players at the supposed “end game” that this is supposed to represent have picked up at least one rank 3 champ from various rewards even if they haven’t spent. If you are done with abyss and don’t have one, you have very bad luck since you also get the nexus from there.

    Fingers crossed people can get there. Ranking less than ideal champs to rank 3 is also something people shouldn’t dismiss. I have Doctor Doom (targeted with Abyss crystal), but my second rank 3 was Mysterio. He brings various utility to the table and helps with prestige. Do I wish it was WL? Yes but I’m very happy with the decision. He is a great rank 3 for me even though most people say he isn’t top 5 tech.
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,106 ★★★★★
    Lainua said:

    Because we are betrayed by Kabam and some youtubers. What they did is unjustified.

    What YouTubers betrayed you? I know you care only about yourself but believe it or not, some people disagree with your views
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • edited September 2020
    This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • edited September 2020
    This content has been removed.
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,106 ★★★★★
    Ah i misunderstood also, i hate that everything is being nerfed into oblivion as well
  • LeNoirFaineantLeNoirFaineant Member Posts: 8,689 ★★★★★
    DrZola said:

    I assume what’s implied by the announcement is that T5c will continue to be easier to get as 2020 winds up—not easy, but easier.

    Whether that’s purely pay for T5c or a blend of pay/play (most likely, especially if solo objectives, Cav difficulty and Variant prizes are any indication) remains to be seen. There are two major deal events between now and 2021–it is impossible for me to believe the team won’t take advantage of the community’s lust for a new title and new toys during both events.

    If I lack the title on Day 1, I’m fine with it. I know what content I need to complete to have a better chance, and I’m reasonably assured of filling out a T5c in one of a few classes soonish even if I don’t complete that content.

    While it will be unfortunate to complete a T5c in the one class I lack a serviceable champ, I’m not worried about that problem until I get there. And I’m definitely not worrying until I fully understand what the precise rewards will be for title-holders—especially if it’s at all like the mediocre Cavalier level rewards.

    Maybe I’ve played the game too long, but I’m honestly past getting riled up about someone else having better pixels than I do. I’m much more concerned with the fun/punishing balance of future MCoC content.

    Dr. Zola

    This is exactly how I feel. I can still get riled up about things but I'm having a hard time getting up off the proverbial couch for this one lol. I lack a serviceable champ in more than one class though. But it's all good. I'll break thrones at some point.
  • NeotwismNeotwism Member Posts: 1,803 ★★★★★
    xNig said:

    It’s just the same old **** show again.

    People complained about the A6 5* gates. Many of those who complained have not even 100% A5.

    Now they are complaining about the 6* R3 gate, whilst many of them have not 100% A6 yet.

    It’s very simple. UC EQ is supposed to help you grow your account to explore A5, while Cav EQ will gradually help you build your roster to explore A6.

    THEN... you’ll be the target group for this title.

    Can you get this title earlier? Definitely, if you get lucky.

    Will you be able to finish the quests aimed at this group? Likely not.

    Just quit whining about the requirements. You’ll get it when you’re ready.

    I REALLY REALLY want the title to be gated behind A6 100%, even if it has been nerfed to the group. At the very least, whoever has that title has a baseline for their rosters.

    Why should it be gated behind 100% A6? All the other titles are achieved just by completion. I don't see why this title should require 100% completion when the others have just been achieved with 1 pass thru. It's not like the titles up until now offer very much to help progression. I guess the cav calendar gives an extra 1/2 t2a every month but that's easily obtainable thru glory or content. I just don't see any reason it needs to be changed now.
  • Master_Dan_1000Master_Dan_1000 Member Posts: 56
    Those who have rank 3 congrats. Those who are no where near a rank 3 then this isn't for you. Its those of us in the middle I'd like Kabam to listen too. Those of us who have completed all the content, have multiple t5cc but haven't ranked anyone to rank 3 yet. We don't want it to be easier to get, make it harder if you like, but just not based on luck.

    Taking one of my curret 6* to rank 3 will not help in any part of the game. Not prestige, not AW defence, and they certainly won't perform as well in any future story content as my god tier rank 5s.

    I still say keep the title for those who have done 100% act 6.
  • Tiger360Tiger360 Member Posts: 1,696 ★★★★

    Well BG is totally free to play and took 6 months off the game, and even he has a rank 3 despite having done only 1 abyss path.
    Doesn’t matter, aside from that 6 months he would grind everyday. He’s an example of how far an F2P player has to go to get the requirements for the title
  • Petusko2811Petusko2811 Member Posts: 36

    Those who have rank 3 congrats. Those who are no where near a rank 3 then this isn't for you. Its those of us in the middle I'd like Kabam to listen too. Those of us who have completed all the content, have multiple t5cc but haven't ranked anyone to rank 3 yet. We don't want it to be easier to get, make it harder if you like, but just not based on luck.

    Taking one of my curret 6* to rank 3 will not help in any part of the game. Not prestige, not AW defence, and they certainly won't perform as well in any future story content as my god tier rank 5s.

    I still say keep the title for those who have done 100% act 6.

    Its your choice, once you see rewards for title you can decide whether you would like to use 1 t5cc on subpar champ to get rewards. Its same like when you want to be in top ally you need to rank for prestige. If you dont like rewards for title then save your t5cc :)
  • This content has been removed.
  • Master_Dan_1000Master_Dan_1000 Member Posts: 56

    Its your choice, once you see rewards for title you can decide whether you would like to use 1 t5cc on subpar champ to get rewards. Its same like when you want to be in top ally you need to rank for prestige. If you dont like rewards for title then save your t5cc :)
    I have no problem at all doing a rank up for increased prestige. But again it's a limited champion pool and requires a dupe or awakening gem.

    I think at first the rewards for the title won't make much difference but in time that will change.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,163 ★★★★★
    GagoH said:

    Cyber Weekend deals coming soon means it is an urgency
    Those Offers aren't an urgency. You're going to get Offers just the same at Cavalier. Perhaps not the same ones, but it's not going to make your Account self-destruct if not.
  • RoOOtsRoOOts Member Posts: 234 ★★
    edited September 2020
    I think it would be logic to give the throne breaker title to people who 100% Act 6 and give the title after all the adjustments have been made. And no i haven explored but just have done completion at the moment waiting for the adjustments.

    But you could can get 100% Act 6 without spending money, and I think KABAM wants to make the title just for the P2W summoners as pointed out before.

    Abyss is also just a P2W content which does not require skill, but only the right champs and a lot of money=units. Comparing the throne breaker title to completion of abyss just confirms that the title is intended for P2W summoners.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.