Ok then, censoring people who say that they don’t enjoy the thing is not a heathy way of taking criticism Kabam! My first post was deleted without me receiving a warning or anything, so I’ll say it again.I’ve lost interest in this due to the fact that firstly it won’t be live and so there cannot be any real interaction, and also it allowed cheaters to get on the leaderboard in the first place! I’m glad that you sorted this out but really it shouldn’t have been an issue in the first place.But my main complaint is that it wasn’t a level playing field as not everyone has the ☠️ masteries or the ideal champ ranked up high as a 4* champ and so the qualifiers were a shambles.I loved the idea but in execution it wasn’t so good at all!!!
But my main complaint is that it wasn’t a level playing field as not everyone has the ☠️ masteries or the ideal champ ranked up high as a 4* champ and so the qualifiers were a shambles.
But my main complaint is that it wasn’t a level playing field as not everyone has the ☠️ masteries or the ideal champ ranked up high as a 4* champ and so the qualifiers were a shambles. You're right, it isn't a level playing field. No competition is a perfectly level playing field, because part of competition is the strength of the competitor. We don't say it is unfair for one team to have taller players than the other team in basketball, because height is a legal advantage in the game of basketball. And in MCOC, the whole point of the game is to build up and rank up a strong diverse roster in your game account and masteries are a part of that account growth. So players with stronger accounts, including roster and masteries, will have advantages over others. The competition chose to reduce but not eliminate the advantage of roster growth (by limiting to 4* champs) and chose to not restrict or alter mastery set ups. That's an entirely legitimate competition decision. If you're not as strong as another competitor due to a lack of champions, a lack of rank up of those champions, or a lack of mastery unlocks, then you will be at a disadvantage to them. But it is a fair disadvantage, because those are all things the game intrinsically values at its core.There's this bizarre fantasy that people often promote, that competition is supposed to be "about skill." No competition is about only skill. Competition is about competitors, and more specifically competitor performance. The most skilled person doesn't win in baseball, the most skilled person doesn't win in auto racing, the most skilled person doesn't even win in chess. The best competitor on the day of the competition wins, and skill is just one factor that determines which competitor performs the best on that day. If competition was supposed to be only about "pure skill" then golfers wouldn't be allowed to use their own clubs, NASCAR drivers would all get identical cars and wouldn't have their own personal pit crews, and marathon runners would all have to wear identical shoes.