Legacy didn't get a legends title and he was in the Beta for 7.1. 1 case is not proof. Nobody is saying doing the beta guarantees you getting legend title. Maybe if he didn’t do the beta he would have got an even slower time. That's pretty much what this thread is about. The beta gives some unfair advantage. I've been in almost all the betas. I don't see a ton of people from the betas getting the title. It's no more of an advantage than others having a better roster. Yeah but you aren’t in a position to say whether it offers enough of an advantage that it’s unfair. Kabam has the data, they can see the percentage of those who get legend title. They should compare the % of people who attempted a run. Split it into 4 categories, 1) those in the beta who got legend title2) those not in beta who got legend title3) those in beta who missed out on legends run4) those not in beta who missed out1 and 2 should be roughly similar, 3 and 4 should be roughly similar. Over all the legends runs kabam has done that had betas first there should be a pretty decent sample. Then, from all those who did a legends run, compare average time of people who were in the beta, with average time of those out of the beta. Again, they should be statistically similar. It’s pretty simple to perform a statistical test on it. And I’m not gonna be taking “I don’t see a ton of people from betas getting the title” as gospel. It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can. But your saying people in the beta have a advantage as gospel but you don't have any proof that those in the beta get the title vs those that aren't. You're just saying they do because the betas exist. I'm sure if there was a distinct advantage for beta users getting the title, Kabam would have done something about it long ago. Seeing as they banned a ton of people for merc'ing and whatnot for the last beta, they are trying their best to make getting the title as fair as possible. I'll point you back to my post"It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can. "Please point out where I said it as gospel, rather than just stating facts. It is reasonable to suggest it gives an advantage. Which part do you disagree with?Doing content makes you more experienced? or being experienced at something when others are not is an advantage? I don't think the beta gives anyone an advantage. Do you have proof that it does? Would you rather go into a fight having fought the fight unlimited times beforehand or go in having only watched videos? Ok so you have no proof it have given the current legends title holders an advantage. Cool. Your lack of an answer seems like an answer itself. There's my proof.
Legacy didn't get a legends title and he was in the Beta for 7.1. 1 case is not proof. Nobody is saying doing the beta guarantees you getting legend title. Maybe if he didn’t do the beta he would have got an even slower time. That's pretty much what this thread is about. The beta gives some unfair advantage. I've been in almost all the betas. I don't see a ton of people from the betas getting the title. It's no more of an advantage than others having a better roster. Yeah but you aren’t in a position to say whether it offers enough of an advantage that it’s unfair. Kabam has the data, they can see the percentage of those who get legend title. They should compare the % of people who attempted a run. Split it into 4 categories, 1) those in the beta who got legend title2) those not in beta who got legend title3) those in beta who missed out on legends run4) those not in beta who missed out1 and 2 should be roughly similar, 3 and 4 should be roughly similar. Over all the legends runs kabam has done that had betas first there should be a pretty decent sample. Then, from all those who did a legends run, compare average time of people who were in the beta, with average time of those out of the beta. Again, they should be statistically similar. It’s pretty simple to perform a statistical test on it. And I’m not gonna be taking “I don’t see a ton of people from betas getting the title” as gospel. It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can. But your saying people in the beta have a advantage as gospel but you don't have any proof that those in the beta get the title vs those that aren't. You're just saying they do because the betas exist. I'm sure if there was a distinct advantage for beta users getting the title, Kabam would have done something about it long ago. Seeing as they banned a ton of people for merc'ing and whatnot for the last beta, they are trying their best to make getting the title as fair as possible. I'll point you back to my post"It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can. "Please point out where I said it as gospel, rather than just stating facts. It is reasonable to suggest it gives an advantage. Which part do you disagree with?Doing content makes you more experienced? or being experienced at something when others are not is an advantage? I don't think the beta gives anyone an advantage. Do you have proof that it does? Would you rather go into a fight having fought the fight unlimited times beforehand or go in having only watched videos? Ok so you have no proof it have given the current legends title holders an advantage. Cool.
Legacy didn't get a legends title and he was in the Beta for 7.1. 1 case is not proof. Nobody is saying doing the beta guarantees you getting legend title. Maybe if he didn’t do the beta he would have got an even slower time. That's pretty much what this thread is about. The beta gives some unfair advantage. I've been in almost all the betas. I don't see a ton of people from the betas getting the title. It's no more of an advantage than others having a better roster. Yeah but you aren’t in a position to say whether it offers enough of an advantage that it’s unfair. Kabam has the data, they can see the percentage of those who get legend title. They should compare the % of people who attempted a run. Split it into 4 categories, 1) those in the beta who got legend title2) those not in beta who got legend title3) those in beta who missed out on legends run4) those not in beta who missed out1 and 2 should be roughly similar, 3 and 4 should be roughly similar. Over all the legends runs kabam has done that had betas first there should be a pretty decent sample. Then, from all those who did a legends run, compare average time of people who were in the beta, with average time of those out of the beta. Again, they should be statistically similar. It’s pretty simple to perform a statistical test on it. And I’m not gonna be taking “I don’t see a ton of people from betas getting the title” as gospel. It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can. But your saying people in the beta have a advantage as gospel but you don't have any proof that those in the beta get the title vs those that aren't. You're just saying they do because the betas exist. I'm sure if there was a distinct advantage for beta users getting the title, Kabam would have done something about it long ago. Seeing as they banned a ton of people for merc'ing and whatnot for the last beta, they are trying their best to make getting the title as fair as possible. I'll point you back to my post"It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can. "Please point out where I said it as gospel, rather than just stating facts. It is reasonable to suggest it gives an advantage. Which part do you disagree with?Doing content makes you more experienced? or being experienced at something when others are not is an advantage? I don't think the beta gives anyone an advantage. Do you have proof that it does? Would you rather go into a fight having fought the fight unlimited times beforehand or go in having only watched videos?
Legacy didn't get a legends title and he was in the Beta for 7.1. 1 case is not proof. Nobody is saying doing the beta guarantees you getting legend title. Maybe if he didn’t do the beta he would have got an even slower time. That's pretty much what this thread is about. The beta gives some unfair advantage. I've been in almost all the betas. I don't see a ton of people from the betas getting the title. It's no more of an advantage than others having a better roster. Yeah but you aren’t in a position to say whether it offers enough of an advantage that it’s unfair. Kabam has the data, they can see the percentage of those who get legend title. They should compare the % of people who attempted a run. Split it into 4 categories, 1) those in the beta who got legend title2) those not in beta who got legend title3) those in beta who missed out on legends run4) those not in beta who missed out1 and 2 should be roughly similar, 3 and 4 should be roughly similar. Over all the legends runs kabam has done that had betas first there should be a pretty decent sample. Then, from all those who did a legends run, compare average time of people who were in the beta, with average time of those out of the beta. Again, they should be statistically similar. It’s pretty simple to perform a statistical test on it. And I’m not gonna be taking “I don’t see a ton of people from betas getting the title” as gospel. It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can. But your saying people in the beta have a advantage as gospel but you don't have any proof that those in the beta get the title vs those that aren't. You're just saying they do because the betas exist. I'm sure if there was a distinct advantage for beta users getting the title, Kabam would have done something about it long ago. Seeing as they banned a ton of people for merc'ing and whatnot for the last beta, they are trying their best to make getting the title as fair as possible. I'll point you back to my post"It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can. "Please point out where I said it as gospel, rather than just stating facts. It is reasonable to suggest it gives an advantage. Which part do you disagree with?Doing content makes you more experienced? or being experienced at something when others are not is an advantage? I don't think the beta gives anyone an advantage. Do you have proof that it does?
Legacy didn't get a legends title and he was in the Beta for 7.1. 1 case is not proof. Nobody is saying doing the beta guarantees you getting legend title. Maybe if he didn’t do the beta he would have got an even slower time. That's pretty much what this thread is about. The beta gives some unfair advantage. I've been in almost all the betas. I don't see a ton of people from the betas getting the title. It's no more of an advantage than others having a better roster. Yeah but you aren’t in a position to say whether it offers enough of an advantage that it’s unfair. Kabam has the data, they can see the percentage of those who get legend title. They should compare the % of people who attempted a run. Split it into 4 categories, 1) those in the beta who got legend title2) those not in beta who got legend title3) those in beta who missed out on legends run4) those not in beta who missed out1 and 2 should be roughly similar, 3 and 4 should be roughly similar. Over all the legends runs kabam has done that had betas first there should be a pretty decent sample. Then, from all those who did a legends run, compare average time of people who were in the beta, with average time of those out of the beta. Again, they should be statistically similar. It’s pretty simple to perform a statistical test on it. And I’m not gonna be taking “I don’t see a ton of people from betas getting the title” as gospel. It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can. But your saying people in the beta have a advantage as gospel but you don't have any proof that those in the beta get the title vs those that aren't. You're just saying they do because the betas exist. I'm sure if there was a distinct advantage for beta users getting the title, Kabam would have done something about it long ago. Seeing as they banned a ton of people for merc'ing and whatnot for the last beta, they are trying their best to make getting the title as fair as possible. I'll point you back to my post"It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can. "Please point out where I said it as gospel, rather than just stating facts. It is reasonable to suggest it gives an advantage. Which part do you disagree with?Doing content makes you more experienced? or being experienced at something when others are not is an advantage?
Legacy didn't get a legends title and he was in the Beta for 7.1. 1 case is not proof. Nobody is saying doing the beta guarantees you getting legend title. Maybe if he didn’t do the beta he would have got an even slower time. That's pretty much what this thread is about. The beta gives some unfair advantage. I've been in almost all the betas. I don't see a ton of people from the betas getting the title. It's no more of an advantage than others having a better roster. Yeah but you aren’t in a position to say whether it offers enough of an advantage that it’s unfair. Kabam has the data, they can see the percentage of those who get legend title. They should compare the % of people who attempted a run. Split it into 4 categories, 1) those in the beta who got legend title2) those not in beta who got legend title3) those in beta who missed out on legends run4) those not in beta who missed out1 and 2 should be roughly similar, 3 and 4 should be roughly similar. Over all the legends runs kabam has done that had betas first there should be a pretty decent sample. Then, from all those who did a legends run, compare average time of people who were in the beta, with average time of those out of the beta. Again, they should be statistically similar. It’s pretty simple to perform a statistical test on it. And I’m not gonna be taking “I don’t see a ton of people from betas getting the title” as gospel. It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can. But your saying people in the beta have a advantage as gospel but you don't have any proof that those in the beta get the title vs those that aren't. You're just saying they do because the betas exist. I'm sure if there was a distinct advantage for beta users getting the title, Kabam would have done something about it long ago. Seeing as they banned a ton of people for merc'ing and whatnot for the last beta, they are trying their best to make getting the title as fair as possible.
Legacy didn't get a legends title and he was in the Beta for 7.1. 1 case is not proof. Nobody is saying doing the beta guarantees you getting legend title. Maybe if he didn’t do the beta he would have got an even slower time. That's pretty much what this thread is about. The beta gives some unfair advantage. I've been in almost all the betas. I don't see a ton of people from the betas getting the title. It's no more of an advantage than others having a better roster. Yeah but you aren’t in a position to say whether it offers enough of an advantage that it’s unfair. Kabam has the data, they can see the percentage of those who get legend title. They should compare the % of people who attempted a run. Split it into 4 categories, 1) those in the beta who got legend title2) those not in beta who got legend title3) those in beta who missed out on legends run4) those not in beta who missed out1 and 2 should be roughly similar, 3 and 4 should be roughly similar. Over all the legends runs kabam has done that had betas first there should be a pretty decent sample. Then, from all those who did a legends run, compare average time of people who were in the beta, with average time of those out of the beta. Again, they should be statistically similar. It’s pretty simple to perform a statistical test on it. And I’m not gonna be taking “I don’t see a ton of people from betas getting the title” as gospel. It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can.
Legacy didn't get a legends title and he was in the Beta for 7.1. 1 case is not proof. Nobody is saying doing the beta guarantees you getting legend title. Maybe if he didn’t do the beta he would have got an even slower time. That's pretty much what this thread is about. The beta gives some unfair advantage. I've been in almost all the betas. I don't see a ton of people from the betas getting the title. It's no more of an advantage than others having a better roster.
Legacy didn't get a legends title and he was in the Beta for 7.1. 1 case is not proof. Nobody is saying doing the beta guarantees you getting legend title. Maybe if he didn’t do the beta he would have got an even slower time.
Legacy didn't get a legends title and he was in the Beta for 7.1.
Your options are1) use the current system, have a lot players beta test and a small subset compete for legends.2) have significantly fewer players in the beta, and run the risk of improperly tuned contentSeems like a no brainer option 1 to me, unless you are clamoring for the original 7.1 to be the norm. Or, when people sign up for Beta testing, make it very clear that they won't be able to do a legends run, put a warning on the email/message. That way, everyone knows that by taking part they will gain an unfair advantage and they can decide whether they would prioritise giving feedback or doing the beta. I would never touch another beta with a 10 foot pole, and I have never seriously attempted a run. It's beyond short sighted to think you'll get correct feedback and also disqualify people. But why? If you want to do a legends run, you shouldn't be able to have a test run first. I think that's fair enough. It should be level ground. I would use an analogy with a race or an obstacle course or a maze, but really i shouldnt need to. This is basic logic and it baffles me how people don't see it. Experience in something is better than no experience. Because you're taking away something for me providing feedback on the content. Currently there is no tangible benefit to beta testing except for helping the community (or the handful of legends runners I suppose). But your solution to the problem is for me to actually give something up to help the community. I wouldn't do it, and others have also indicated as much, and the beta test would suffer for it.Is it possible that beta testing is helpful to a legends run? Sure it absolutely is possible. Is preventing that worth reducing the number of beta testers? Not to me. I understand and respect your opinion, but disagree. I think that the ability to do the beta and a legends run is taking away something in game from those who can't access the beta. I also think that the amount of beta testers it would reduce is pretty small in the grand scheme and the amount of feedback available would not impact how successful the beta would be. Kabam shouldnt put the beta above one of the highest contests in the entire game, legend runs.
Your options are1) use the current system, have a lot players beta test and a small subset compete for legends.2) have significantly fewer players in the beta, and run the risk of improperly tuned contentSeems like a no brainer option 1 to me, unless you are clamoring for the original 7.1 to be the norm. Or, when people sign up for Beta testing, make it very clear that they won't be able to do a legends run, put a warning on the email/message. That way, everyone knows that by taking part they will gain an unfair advantage and they can decide whether they would prioritise giving feedback or doing the beta. I would never touch another beta with a 10 foot pole, and I have never seriously attempted a run. It's beyond short sighted to think you'll get correct feedback and also disqualify people. But why? If you want to do a legends run, you shouldn't be able to have a test run first. I think that's fair enough. It should be level ground. I would use an analogy with a race or an obstacle course or a maze, but really i shouldnt need to. This is basic logic and it baffles me how people don't see it. Experience in something is better than no experience. Because you're taking away something for me providing feedback on the content. Currently there is no tangible benefit to beta testing except for helping the community (or the handful of legends runners I suppose). But your solution to the problem is for me to actually give something up to help the community. I wouldn't do it, and others have also indicated as much, and the beta test would suffer for it.Is it possible that beta testing is helpful to a legends run? Sure it absolutely is possible. Is preventing that worth reducing the number of beta testers? Not to me.
Your options are1) use the current system, have a lot players beta test and a small subset compete for legends.2) have significantly fewer players in the beta, and run the risk of improperly tuned contentSeems like a no brainer option 1 to me, unless you are clamoring for the original 7.1 to be the norm. Or, when people sign up for Beta testing, make it very clear that they won't be able to do a legends run, put a warning on the email/message. That way, everyone knows that by taking part they will gain an unfair advantage and they can decide whether they would prioritise giving feedback or doing the beta. I would never touch another beta with a 10 foot pole, and I have never seriously attempted a run. It's beyond short sighted to think you'll get correct feedback and also disqualify people. But why? If you want to do a legends run, you shouldn't be able to have a test run first. I think that's fair enough. It should be level ground. I would use an analogy with a race or an obstacle course or a maze, but really i shouldnt need to. This is basic logic and it baffles me how people don't see it. Experience in something is better than no experience.
Your options are1) use the current system, have a lot players beta test and a small subset compete for legends.2) have significantly fewer players in the beta, and run the risk of improperly tuned contentSeems like a no brainer option 1 to me, unless you are clamoring for the original 7.1 to be the norm. Or, when people sign up for Beta testing, make it very clear that they won't be able to do a legends run, put a warning on the email/message. That way, everyone knows that by taking part they will gain an unfair advantage and they can decide whether they would prioritise giving feedback or doing the beta. I would never touch another beta with a 10 foot pole, and I have never seriously attempted a run. It's beyond short sighted to think you'll get correct feedback and also disqualify people.
Your options are1) use the current system, have a lot players beta test and a small subset compete for legends.2) have significantly fewer players in the beta, and run the risk of improperly tuned contentSeems like a no brainer option 1 to me, unless you are clamoring for the original 7.1 to be the norm. Or, when people sign up for Beta testing, make it very clear that they won't be able to do a legends run, put a warning on the email/message. That way, everyone knows that by taking part they will gain an unfair advantage and they can decide whether they would prioritise giving feedback or doing the beta.
Your options are1) use the current system, have a lot players beta test and a small subset compete for legends.2) have significantly fewer players in the beta, and run the risk of improperly tuned contentSeems like a no brainer option 1 to me, unless you are clamoring for the original 7.1 to be the norm.
When I was given access to test the Grandmaster fight for 6.4, I was told that in doing so, I will forfeit my entitlement in doing a Legends run. So I said no.A few days later, I was contacted again that beta testing it will not cause my disqualification for the legends run. I then agreed.Wanna guess why the decision on legends run disqualification was reversed? That's an interesting point to be fair, I'll admit I wasn't aware. I think the decision shouldn't have been reversed. I wonder if the decision was based on beta user outrage, the whole community or data.
When I was given access to test the Grandmaster fight for 6.4, I was told that in doing so, I will forfeit my entitlement in doing a Legends run. So I said no.A few days later, I was contacted again that beta testing it will not cause my disqualification for the legends run. I then agreed.Wanna guess why the decision on legends run disqualification was reversed?
Legacy didn't get a legends title and he was in the Beta for 7.1. 1 case is not proof. Nobody is saying doing the beta guarantees you getting legend title. Maybe if he didn’t do the beta he would have got an even slower time. That's pretty much what this thread is about. The beta gives some unfair advantage. I've been in almost all the betas. I don't see a ton of people from the betas getting the title. It's no more of an advantage than others having a better roster. Yeah but you aren’t in a position to say whether it offers enough of an advantage that it’s unfair. Kabam has the data, they can see the percentage of those who get legend title. They should compare the % of people who attempted a run. Split it into 4 categories, 1) those in the beta who got legend title2) those not in beta who got legend title3) those in beta who missed out on legends run4) those not in beta who missed out1 and 2 should be roughly similar, 3 and 4 should be roughly similar. Over all the legends runs kabam has done that had betas first there should be a pretty decent sample. Then, from all those who did a legends run, compare average time of people who were in the beta, with average time of those out of the beta. Again, they should be statistically similar. It’s pretty simple to perform a statistical test on it. And I’m not gonna be taking “I don’t see a ton of people from betas getting the title” as gospel. It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can. But your saying people in the beta have a advantage as gospel but you don't have any proof that those in the beta get the title vs those that aren't. You're just saying they do because the betas exist. I'm sure if there was a distinct advantage for beta users getting the title, Kabam would have done something about it long ago. Seeing as they banned a ton of people for merc'ing and whatnot for the last beta, they are trying their best to make getting the title as fair as possible. I'll point you back to my post"It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can. "Please point out where I said it as gospel, rather than just stating facts. It is reasonable to suggest it gives an advantage. Which part do you disagree with?Doing content makes you more experienced? or being experienced at something when others are not is an advantage? I don't think the beta gives anyone an advantage. Do you have proof that it does? Would you rather go into a fight having fought the fight unlimited times beforehand or go in having only watched videos? Ok so you have no proof it have given the current legends title holders an advantage. Cool. Your lack of an answer seems like an answer itself. There's my proof. I'm saying either fighting the fight yourself or watching a video on the fight is the same thing. There are people in this world who are visual learners and there are people in this world who learn by doing. So to answer your question, both ways can give any person an advantage depending how they best learn. You may learn by doing which means you focus strictly on that ability and are applying it to everyone to make it a point. Then there are some that are just skilled and it won't matter who they fight. Ok, but what about those who don't learn by watching. When I watched Grand master fights on youtube it didn't help me one bit, I went into the fight and learned by doing. To some people it might be the same to watch or do. The difference is that it's not like that for everyone. For visual learners they can watch youtube, for others they can't do the fight unless they are in the beta.
Legacy didn't get a legends title and he was in the Beta for 7.1. 1 case is not proof. Nobody is saying doing the beta guarantees you getting legend title. Maybe if he didn’t do the beta he would have got an even slower time. That's pretty much what this thread is about. The beta gives some unfair advantage. I've been in almost all the betas. I don't see a ton of people from the betas getting the title. It's no more of an advantage than others having a better roster. Yeah but you aren’t in a position to say whether it offers enough of an advantage that it’s unfair. Kabam has the data, they can see the percentage of those who get legend title. They should compare the % of people who attempted a run. Split it into 4 categories, 1) those in the beta who got legend title2) those not in beta who got legend title3) those in beta who missed out on legends run4) those not in beta who missed out1 and 2 should be roughly similar, 3 and 4 should be roughly similar. Over all the legends runs kabam has done that had betas first there should be a pretty decent sample. Then, from all those who did a legends run, compare average time of people who were in the beta, with average time of those out of the beta. Again, they should be statistically similar. It’s pretty simple to perform a statistical test on it. And I’m not gonna be taking “I don’t see a ton of people from betas getting the title” as gospel. It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can. But your saying people in the beta have a advantage as gospel but you don't have any proof that those in the beta get the title vs those that aren't. You're just saying they do because the betas exist. I'm sure if there was a distinct advantage for beta users getting the title, Kabam would have done something about it long ago. Seeing as they banned a ton of people for merc'ing and whatnot for the last beta, they are trying their best to make getting the title as fair as possible. I'll point you back to my post"It is reasonable enough to say that doing content makes you more experienced at it. That is a fact. If I never fought a fight, then did it on a beta, I am more experienced at it. It is reasonable to suggest this could give an advantage, again this is not an opinion. It is a fact that this could be an advantage. It’s then up to kabam to analyse it and see if they’re giving players an advantage to do the content before others can. "Please point out where I said it as gospel, rather than just stating facts. It is reasonable to suggest it gives an advantage. Which part do you disagree with?Doing content makes you more experienced? or being experienced at something when others are not is an advantage? I don't think the beta gives anyone an advantage. Do you have proof that it does? Would you rather go into a fight having fought the fight unlimited times beforehand or go in having only watched videos? Ok so you have no proof it have given the current legends title holders an advantage. Cool. Your lack of an answer seems like an answer itself. There's my proof. I'm saying either fighting the fight yourself or watching a video on the fight is the same thing. There are people in this world who are visual learners and there are people in this world who learn by doing. So to answer your question, both ways can give any person an advantage depending how they best learn. You may learn by doing which means you focus strictly on that ability and are applying it to everyone to make it a point. Then there are some that are just skilled and it won't matter who they fight.
Your options are1) use the current system, have a lot players beta test and a small subset compete for legends.2) have significantly fewer players in the beta, and run the risk of improperly tuned contentSeems like a no brainer option 1 to me, unless you are clamoring for the original 7.1 to be the norm. Or, when people sign up for Beta testing, make it very clear that they won't be able to do a legends run, put a warning on the email/message. That way, everyone knows that by taking part they will gain an unfair advantage and they can decide whether they would prioritise giving feedback or doing the beta. I would never touch another beta with a 10 foot pole, and I have never seriously attempted a run. It's beyond short sighted to think you'll get correct feedback and also disqualify people. But why? If you want to do a legends run, you shouldn't be able to have a test run first. I think that's fair enough. It should be level ground. I would use an analogy with a race or an obstacle course or a maze, but really i shouldnt need to. This is basic logic and it baffles me how people don't see it. Experience in something is better than no experience. It's not and has never been level ground. People hoovering up every offer and crystal with multiple teams of R3s have an advantage over those that don't. So I guess that's a 3rd bracket that we need now. People that have gotten luckier with champ and catalyst pulls but are f2p have an advantage over those less lucky. There's a 4th bracket. You can make lord knows how many different brackets for every advantage there is but at the end of the day, it's never going to be level. This whole argument is flat out silly imo. Offers and Crystals are in-game advantages available to everyone. Your account, do what you want with it. Luck is not controlled by kabam. The beta offers a chance to plan, do and refine your legends run. That is a clear advantage not available to every player.
Your options are1) use the current system, have a lot players beta test and a small subset compete for legends.2) have significantly fewer players in the beta, and run the risk of improperly tuned contentSeems like a no brainer option 1 to me, unless you are clamoring for the original 7.1 to be the norm. Or, when people sign up for Beta testing, make it very clear that they won't be able to do a legends run, put a warning on the email/message. That way, everyone knows that by taking part they will gain an unfair advantage and they can decide whether they would prioritise giving feedback or doing the beta. I would never touch another beta with a 10 foot pole, and I have never seriously attempted a run. It's beyond short sighted to think you'll get correct feedback and also disqualify people. But why? If you want to do a legends run, you shouldn't be able to have a test run first. I think that's fair enough. It should be level ground. I would use an analogy with a race or an obstacle course or a maze, but really i shouldnt need to. This is basic logic and it baffles me how people don't see it. Experience in something is better than no experience. It's not and has never been level ground. People hoovering up every offer and crystal with multiple teams of R3s have an advantage over those that don't. So I guess that's a 3rd bracket that we need now. People that have gotten luckier with champ and catalyst pulls but are f2p have an advantage over those less lucky. There's a 4th bracket. You can make lord knows how many different brackets for every advantage there is but at the end of the day, it's never going to be level. This whole argument is flat out silly imo.
Your options are1) use the current system, have a lot players beta test and a small subset compete for legends.2) have significantly fewer players in the beta, and run the risk of improperly tuned contentSeems like a no brainer option 1 to me, unless you are clamoring for the original 7.1 to be the norm. Or, when people sign up for Beta testing, make it very clear that they won't be able to do a legends run, put a warning on the email/message. That way, everyone knows that by taking part they will gain an unfair advantage and they can decide whether they would prioritise giving feedback or doing the beta. I would never touch another beta with a 10 foot pole, and I have never seriously attempted a run. It's beyond short sighted to think you'll get correct feedback and also disqualify people. But why? If you want to do a legends run, you shouldn't be able to have a test run first. I think that's fair enough. It should be level ground. I would use an analogy with a race or an obstacle course or a maze, but really i shouldnt need to. This is basic logic and it baffles me how people don't see it. Experience in something is better than no experience. It's not and has never been level ground. People hoovering up every offer and crystal with multiple teams of R3s have an advantage over those that don't. So I guess that's a 3rd bracket that we need now. People that have gotten luckier with champ and catalyst pulls but are f2p have an advantage over those less lucky. There's a 4th bracket. You can make lord knows how many different brackets for every advantage there is but at the end of the day, it's never going to be level. This whole argument is flat out silly imo. Offers and Crystals are in-game advantages available to everyone. Your account, do what you want with it. Luck is not controlled by kabam. The beta offers a chance to plan, do and refine your legends run. That is a clear advantage not available to every player. So does watching youtube videos. Yep, and everyone can do that.
Your options are1) use the current system, have a lot players beta test and a small subset compete for legends.2) have significantly fewer players in the beta, and run the risk of improperly tuned contentSeems like a no brainer option 1 to me, unless you are clamoring for the original 7.1 to be the norm. Or, when people sign up for Beta testing, make it very clear that they won't be able to do a legends run, put a warning on the email/message. That way, everyone knows that by taking part they will gain an unfair advantage and they can decide whether they would prioritise giving feedback or doing the beta. I would never touch another beta with a 10 foot pole, and I have never seriously attempted a run. It's beyond short sighted to think you'll get correct feedback and also disqualify people. But why? If you want to do a legends run, you shouldn't be able to have a test run first. I think that's fair enough. It should be level ground. I would use an analogy with a race or an obstacle course or a maze, but really i shouldnt need to. This is basic logic and it baffles me how people don't see it. Experience in something is better than no experience. It's not and has never been level ground. People hoovering up every offer and crystal with multiple teams of R3s have an advantage over those that don't. So I guess that's a 3rd bracket that we need now. People that have gotten luckier with champ and catalyst pulls but are f2p have an advantage over those less lucky. There's a 4th bracket. You can make lord knows how many different brackets for every advantage there is but at the end of the day, it's never going to be level. This whole argument is flat out silly imo. Offers and Crystals are in-game advantages available to everyone. Your account, do what you want with it. Luck is not controlled by kabam. The beta offers a chance to plan, do and refine your legends run. That is a clear advantage not available to every player. So does watching youtube videos.
Your options are1) use the current system, have a lot players beta test and a small subset compete for legends.2) have significantly fewer players in the beta, and run the risk of improperly tuned contentSeems like a no brainer option 1 to me, unless you are clamoring for the original 7.1 to be the norm. Or, when people sign up for Beta testing, make it very clear that they won't be able to do a legends run, put a warning on the email/message. That way, everyone knows that by taking part they will gain an unfair advantage and they can decide whether they would prioritise giving feedback or doing the beta. I would never touch another beta with a 10 foot pole, and I have never seriously attempted a run. It's beyond short sighted to think you'll get correct feedback and also disqualify people. But why? If you want to do a legends run, you shouldn't be able to have a test run first. I think that's fair enough. It should be level ground. I would use an analogy with a race or an obstacle course or a maze, but really i shouldnt need to. This is basic logic and it baffles me how people don't see it. Experience in something is better than no experience. It's not and has never been level ground. People hoovering up every offer and crystal with multiple teams of R3s have an advantage over those that don't. So I guess that's a 3rd bracket that we need now. People that have gotten luckier with champ and catalyst pulls but are f2p have an advantage over those less lucky. There's a 4th bracket. You can make lord knows how many different brackets for every advantage there is but at the end of the day, it's never going to be level. This whole argument is flat out silly imo. Offers and Crystals are in-game advantages available to everyone. Your account, do what you want with it. Luck is not controlled by kabam. The beta offers a chance to plan, do and refine your legends run. That is a clear advantage not available to every player. So does watching youtube videos. Yep, and everyone can do that. So we agree that there isn't an advantage since everyone can plan via youtube videos. Cool. Nope. We already established there is an advantage from the beta.
Your options are1) use the current system, have a lot players beta test and a small subset compete for legends.2) have significantly fewer players in the beta, and run the risk of improperly tuned contentSeems like a no brainer option 1 to me, unless you are clamoring for the original 7.1 to be the norm. Or, when people sign up for Beta testing, make it very clear that they won't be able to do a legends run, put a warning on the email/message. That way, everyone knows that by taking part they will gain an unfair advantage and they can decide whether they would prioritise giving feedback or doing the beta. I would never touch another beta with a 10 foot pole, and I have never seriously attempted a run. It's beyond short sighted to think you'll get correct feedback and also disqualify people. But why? If you want to do a legends run, you shouldn't be able to have a test run first. I think that's fair enough. It should be level ground. I would use an analogy with a race or an obstacle course or a maze, but really i shouldnt need to. This is basic logic and it baffles me how people don't see it. Experience in something is better than no experience. It's not and has never been level ground. People hoovering up every offer and crystal with multiple teams of R3s have an advantage over those that don't. So I guess that's a 3rd bracket that we need now. People that have gotten luckier with champ and catalyst pulls but are f2p have an advantage over those less lucky. There's a 4th bracket. You can make lord knows how many different brackets for every advantage there is but at the end of the day, it's never going to be level. This whole argument is flat out silly imo. Offers and Crystals are in-game advantages available to everyone. Your account, do what you want with it. Luck is not controlled by kabam. The beta offers a chance to plan, do and refine your legends run. That is a clear advantage not available to every player. So does watching youtube videos. Yep, and everyone can do that. So we agree that there isn't an advantage since everyone can plan via youtube videos. Cool.
Your options are1) use the current system, have a lot players beta test and a small subset compete for legends.2) have significantly fewer players in the beta, and run the risk of improperly tuned contentSeems like a no brainer option 1 to me, unless you are clamoring for the original 7.1 to be the norm. Or, when people sign up for Beta testing, make it very clear that they won't be able to do a legends run, put a warning on the email/message. That way, everyone knows that by taking part they will gain an unfair advantage and they can decide whether they would prioritise giving feedback or doing the beta. I would never touch another beta with a 10 foot pole, and I have never seriously attempted a run. It's beyond short sighted to think you'll get correct feedback and also disqualify people. But why? If you want to do a legends run, you shouldn't be able to have a test run first. I think that's fair enough. It should be level ground. I would use an analogy with a race or an obstacle course or a maze, but really i shouldnt need to. This is basic logic and it baffles me how people don't see it. Experience in something is better than no experience. It's not and has never been level ground. People hoovering up every offer and crystal with multiple teams of R3s have an advantage over those that don't. So I guess that's a 3rd bracket that we need now. People that have gotten luckier with champ and catalyst pulls but are f2p have an advantage over those less lucky. There's a 4th bracket. You can make lord knows how many different brackets for every advantage there is but at the end of the day, it's never going to be level. This whole argument is flat out silly imo. Offers and Crystals are in-game advantages available to everyone. Your account, do what you want with it. Luck is not controlled by kabam. The beta offers a chance to plan, do and refine your legends run. That is a clear advantage not available to every player. That's irrelevant though bc those spending advantages may be technically "available" to everyone, but they're just not in reality.Having an advantage either matters or it doesn't as far as I'm concerned. You either have to eliminate them all or you don't actually have a leg to stand on. An offer is offered to everyone in the game, aside from certain IOS and Android offers. That makes it available to everyone and so is not considered here. With regards to advantages, it’s not as black and white as that. You have to draw a line between fair and unfair advantages. Spending on the game is a fair advantage, hacking is an unfair advantage. Luck is a fair advantage, hypothetically having a 6* in content where only 4* are allowed is an unfair advantage. I’d argue that fighting fights before anyone else can is pretty obviously an unfair advantage
Your options are1) use the current system, have a lot players beta test and a small subset compete for legends.2) have significantly fewer players in the beta, and run the risk of improperly tuned contentSeems like a no brainer option 1 to me, unless you are clamoring for the original 7.1 to be the norm. Or, when people sign up for Beta testing, make it very clear that they won't be able to do a legends run, put a warning on the email/message. That way, everyone knows that by taking part they will gain an unfair advantage and they can decide whether they would prioritise giving feedback or doing the beta. I would never touch another beta with a 10 foot pole, and I have never seriously attempted a run. It's beyond short sighted to think you'll get correct feedback and also disqualify people. But why? If you want to do a legends run, you shouldn't be able to have a test run first. I think that's fair enough. It should be level ground. I would use an analogy with a race or an obstacle course or a maze, but really i shouldnt need to. This is basic logic and it baffles me how people don't see it. Experience in something is better than no experience. It's not and has never been level ground. People hoovering up every offer and crystal with multiple teams of R3s have an advantage over those that don't. So I guess that's a 3rd bracket that we need now. People that have gotten luckier with champ and catalyst pulls but are f2p have an advantage over those less lucky. There's a 4th bracket. You can make lord knows how many different brackets for every advantage there is but at the end of the day, it's never going to be level. This whole argument is flat out silly imo. Offers and Crystals are in-game advantages available to everyone. Your account, do what you want with it. Luck is not controlled by kabam. The beta offers a chance to plan, do and refine your legends run. That is a clear advantage not available to every player. That's irrelevant though bc those spending advantages may be technically "available" to everyone, but they're just not in reality.Having an advantage either matters or it doesn't as far as I'm concerned. You either have to eliminate them all or you don't actually have a leg to stand on.
Your options are1) use the current system, have a lot players beta test and a small subset compete for legends.2) have significantly fewer players in the beta, and run the risk of improperly tuned contentSeems like a no brainer option 1 to me, unless you are clamoring for the original 7.1 to be the norm. Or, when people sign up for Beta testing, make it very clear that they won't be able to do a legends run, put a warning on the email/message. That way, everyone knows that by taking part they will gain an unfair advantage and they can decide whether they would prioritise giving feedback or doing the beta. I would never touch another beta with a 10 foot pole, and I have never seriously attempted a run. It's beyond short sighted to think you'll get correct feedback and also disqualify people. But why? If you want to do a legends run, you shouldn't be able to have a test run first. I think that's fair enough. It should be level ground. I would use an analogy with a race or an obstacle course or a maze, but really i shouldnt need to. This is basic logic and it baffles me how people don't see it. Experience in something is better than no experience. It's not and has never been level ground. People hoovering up every offer and crystal with multiple teams of R3s have an advantage over those that don't. So I guess that's a 3rd bracket that we need now. People that have gotten luckier with champ and catalyst pulls but are f2p have an advantage over those less lucky. There's a 4th bracket. You can make lord knows how many different brackets for every advantage there is but at the end of the day, it's never going to be level. This whole argument is flat out silly imo. Offers and Crystals are in-game advantages available to everyone. Your account, do what you want with it. Luck is not controlled by kabam. The beta offers a chance to plan, do and refine your legends run. That is a clear advantage not available to every player. That's irrelevant though bc those spending advantages may be technically "available" to everyone, but they're just not in reality.Having an advantage either matters or it doesn't as far as I'm concerned. You either have to eliminate them all or you don't actually have a leg to stand on. An offer is offered to everyone in the game, aside from certain IOS and Android offers. That makes it available to everyone and so is not considered here. With regards to advantages, it’s not as black and white as that. You have to draw a line between fair and unfair advantages. Spending on the game is a fair advantage, hacking is an unfair advantage. Luck is a fair advantage, hypothetically having a 6* in content where only 4* are allowed is an unfair advantage. I’d argue that fighting fights before anyone else can is pretty obviously an unfair advantage And obviously Kabam disagrees with it being unfair or at least agrees that having those people willing to actually participate in betas is worth the potential advantage. You can't cherry pick which advantages you deem okay. That's my whole issue with that side of the argument. Oh this is okay, and this is okay, but I don't like that so I'm saying it's unfair. You just lose any credibility at that point with me.