10 Times MVP of AW in Tier

MVP is the one who contributes more than others. It is with skill or items, MVP of the AW matches should be rewarded at least in Tier 1 maybe in 2.

If someone collects 10 or 15 AW MVP in a limited period they should be rewarded with special titles or extra shards so top alliance players can avoid dropping tier for easier shards

Comments

Kronos987654321

INTEGRAL wrote: »

MVP is the one who contributes more than others. It is with skill or items, MVP of the AW matches should be rewarded at least in Tier 1 maybe in 2.

If someone collects 10 or 15 AW MVP in a limited period they should be rewarded with special titles or extra shards so top alliance players can avoid dropping tier for easier shards

This would be bad because players within a BG would **** about not getting more fights than others.

Deadbyrd9

I agree that it wouldn't be a good idea because people would want paths with more fights and cause fighting within an alliance

LocoMotives

Then you're dealing with people fighting for the longer lines or getting pissed when someone else takes a fight they were supposed to. Also sets the officers in a tough position by basically deciding who will take the MVP lines.

Then do we complain about the top player that moves to a lesser ally so that he can be guaranteed to be the boss killer and get his extra rewards? Guarantee some will.

CoatHang3r

That would encourage poor play or leave out people who don't run certain lines and place thier highest PI defenders rather than thier best defenders.

If people specifically go for MVP they can actually be doing the war effort harm by going for thier personal score rather than doing what is needed to win.

It is a team effort not about individual acheivement. MVP is a bad metric and should actually be removed.

unknown

This content has been removed.

Mwhitaker23

that system is broken anyway

chunkyb

I take from the poison node to the left mini and am mvp every war. I hate it lol. But sure, gimme something for it.

Ledfloydian

I have 17 mvp from doing left side.
Don’t even need to take out mini boss. Wouldn’t mind a legend title if I hit 20 before anyone else:)
Not easy to solo that line without items, so it’s not a completely broken stat

Jimmy_Utah83

Individual defender rating plays a big part. Ive seen guys get MVP w/ lower kills (attack & defender), lower exploration
over ppl who contribute more. Its a useless stat.

Viper1987

I agree with Coat, that this is actually a horrible metric. It has the potential to foster negative interactions within an alliance. I am saying this as someone who has 7 MVPs (not a point to brag, but to show that I'm not whining because I don't have any). I have been taking path 3 for the most part, or path 1 if needed. To be honest, those paths are actually incredibly easy. The middle paths look ridiculously harder (especially with the new node buffs), and if MVPs are to be awarded, it should be for people completing those paths. But all in all, the MVP was a pointless stat to be added when they should've added a more useful stat, like say, um, prestige?

Mhykke

I don't understand why the MVP system in war doesn't get calculated like it does in AQ...where you can get partial points for taking down an enemy, and get more points for taking out minis and the boss. That way if a person contributes on killing a boss, they get some credit, and it isn't based off of just moving across a lot of nodes.

DarkestDestroyer

Shouldn't get anything for an MVP... hardest paths are middle and they never have the chance for an MVP as path 1 & 8 have more fights but easier.

If anything the MVPs are the players who can't hand the hard paths lol

roastedbagel

A Legend title for MVPs? LOL

Speedrunners shouldn't even be getting Legends title let alone people getting a #1 in a metric that (in typical Kabam fashion) doesn't correlate to skill at all.