Simple Solution IMO

It's easier to say this than being done.
But maybe Kabam can find a way to Disable or Remove the "KICK" button for Alliance leader and officer when viewing a player's profile in the alliance when that certain player has participated in at least 5 wars.
So we can avoid this drama when players get kicked before they get the season rewards.
This will also help the leaders and officers to monitor who are those members who have not yet completed 5 wars cause KICK button will still be there for them.

Comments

OGAvenger

The safest hands are still our own.

I see what you’re saying but if they even could do this you’d have scum people play 5 wars then coast the rest of the season because they know they can’t be kicked. Just like right now there are some scum out there that kick people day before season ends. There’s going to be scum no matter what. It’s just a part of life unfortunately

Malreck04

I don't think there's ever been a simple solution in an IMO

odishika123

SHIELD4AGENT

Wow 🤣

SHIELD4AGENT

The safest hands are still our own.

I see what you’re saying but if they even could do this you’d have scum people play 5 wars then coast the rest of the season because they know they can’t be kicked. Just like right now there are some scum out there that kick people day before season ends. There’s going to be scum no matter what. It’s just a part of life unfortunately

Yeah there will always be those people, but atleast Kabam will have an idea how to start addressing this issue of players getting kicked unreasonably.

LBN1

Also a simple solution, be a good Ally. Play AQ and AW. I've never kicked a good Ally mate, only those who coast...like placing defenders and never attacking in war. There should be plenty of Alliances that value a consistent player, we're always looking for them. If you were a good Ally mate and still got kicked, that is bad and I hope you find a better Alliance.

unknown

This content has been removed.

RavenKeeper

This is horrible. So much trolling and screwing over of alliance's would happen

Jaded

As I have suggested in the past there should always be a two step kick, requiring two people either officers and/or leader to kick a player. This might curve some of the kickings but it wouldn’t solve them all. If they feel you don’t deserve rewards that won’t change.

Aburaees

That would only allow someone to get away with 5 of these:

Lpoo

That would only allow someone to get away with 5 of these:

I’d like to know the story/explanation for this

Aburaees

That would only allow someone to get away with 5 of these:

I’d like to know the story/explanation for this

It’s just to illustrate that the quality of contribution needs to be taken into account.

That particular image can be replicated by placing defenders, moving one tile in the attack phase, and failing to take down a single defender. A one-off might be excused, if there’s a good explanation, but a repeat of that performance could suggest the person is leaching or out of their depth.

GroundedWisdom

The problem is these are in-house issues. You can't really lock someone into an Alliance, and Kabam isn't responsible for douchey behavior within the Alliance. That's why it's important to stay committed to an Alliance you can trust.

awesomesauce

If you mean the ability to kick someone, I disagree.

However the kick button should have a confirmation message to ensure the interaction was intended. I.e. leadership looking at players profiles where it says "view/duel/kick" if they meant to duel for practice, they may accidentally kick that player. Though there might be a confirmation message, as it's been a couple years since I was an officer or above.

hungryhungrybbq

It's easier to say this than being done.
But maybe Kabam can find a way to Disable or Remove the "KICK" button for Alliance leader and officer when viewing a player's profile in the alliance when that certain player has participated in at least 5 wars.
So we can avoid this drama when players get kicked before they get the season rewards.
This will also help the leaders and officers to monitor who are those members who have not yet completed 5 wars cause KICK button will still be there for them.

It's just not possible. Alliance leadership must always have control of it's membership. In order to protect said membership. If there was a kick lockout of any type, this could lead to loss of rewards for 30 players instead of 1. Not just in competitive war, but in AQ as well. Higher tier maps have sections with 10 paths. If just 1 of the 30 members were to take advantage of this lockout, the entire alliance could lose massive rewards from incomplete AQ cycles, etc. And that doesn't even touch on the implications of AW.