Appreciation

Don't u guys think leaders of alliances who are running successfully for quite some time should get some appreciation?

I mean if rewards for specially leaders are introduced there will be hell lotta problem, everyone will open their own alliance and all.

I am just asking isn't it a good idea to bring some titles as appreciation to leaders? Say those titles will vary from leaders of gold plat and bronze alliances and all. But only titles. I mean as leaders we do lots of hardwork and all.. Isn't easy to maintain 30 members, plan aw, plan aq and most importantly recruit lol.

Everyone's response is welcomed but i will prefer only leader of alliances reply to this post.

What does the mod think regarding this. Will be helpful if they reply! Thanks

Comments

Sean_Who

What about the officers? They deserve some love too!

Oh, and then what about the players that keep everything running smoothly too?! Give those guys some love!

Luke9523

What about the officers? They deserve some love too!

Oh, and then what about the players that keep everything running smoothly too?! Give those guys some love!

And what about the people who created the game? They need some appreciation too!
And their husbands and wives!

The_man001

What about the officers? They deserve some love too!

Oh, and then what about the players that keep everything running smoothly too?! Give those guys some love!

Officers and leaders puts much more effort than members bro.. Would u deny that?

The_man001

What about the officers? They deserve some love too!

Oh, and then what about the players that keep everything running smoothly too?! Give those guys some love!

Officers and leaders puts much more effort than members bro.. Would u deny that?

Planning aq
Planning aw
Adapting and helping the alliance to adapt to new changes
And hell yeah recruiting
Members are free from this responsibility.

And all i am asking is if its a good idea to appreciate this with titles.

The_man001

What about the officers? They deserve some love too!

Oh, and then what about the players that keep everything running smoothly too?! Give those guys some love!

And what about the people who created the game? They need some appreciation too!
And their husbands and wives!

First of all, That's totally off topic
They are getting paid lmao... U surely aren't leader.. This post will recieve tons of disagrees from guys like u.

Wicket329

I have been an officer in an alliance for longer than I haven’t been. There absolutely should not be any in game perks to being an officer or leader.

People should do those roles because they want to and because they are good at it, not because of any rewards or status.

The_man001

I have been an officer in an alliance for longer than I haven’t been. There absolutely should not be any in game perks to being an officer or leader.

People should do those roles because they want to and because they are good at it, not because of any rewards or status.

I do know rewards will create a huge chaos.. But title? Titles even doesn't matter much..It only matters that much enough to appreciate the extra hard works some put in.

Noobda

The_man001

I have been an officer in an alliance for longer than I haven’t been. There absolutely should not be any in game perks to being an officer or leader.

People should do those roles because they want to and because they are good at it, not because of any rewards or status.

In that way we can say that, people likes the game, they are good at the game, they should play the game, they shouldn't hope for any rewards or titles... Like say u can complete act 6 7 but will not get any reward.. U completed it because u liked it and u r good at the game that's ur reward. How does this sound?

Noise72

I think its a great idea to give leaders/officers something like a title or profile pic. But only if that alliance has achieved something decent like a certain score/rank in AW & AQ. My alt account is a leader in an alliance with no members and definitely doesn't deserve anything lol

The_man001

I think its a great idea to give leaders/officers something like a title or profile pic. But only if that alliance has achieved something decent like a certain score/rank in AW & AQ. My alt account is a leader in an alliance with no members and definitely doesn't deserve anything lol

Exactly u r absolutely right.

The_man001

Well at least we should get a title named" hated by all non leaders and non officers" after checking the number of disagrees in here. LOL

Sean_Who

Well at least we should get a title named" hated by all non leaders and non officers" after checking the number of disagrees in here. LOL

Maybe "Entitled" would suit you better.

The_man001

@DNA3000 @BitterSteel what u guys think?

Demonzfyre

Don't u guys think leaders of alliances who are running successfully for quite some time should get some appreciation?

I mean if rewards for specially leaders are introduced there will be hell lotta problem, everyone will open their own alliance and all.

I am just asking isn't it a good idea to bring some titles as appreciation to leaders? Say those titles will vary from leaders of gold plat and bronze alliances and all. But only titles. I mean as leaders we do lots of hardwork and all.. Isn't easy to maintain 30 members, plan aw, plan aq and most importantly recruit lol.

Everyone's response is welcomed but i will prefer only leader of alliances reply to this post.

What does the mod think regarding this. Will be helpful if they reply! Thanks

No, you're only successful as a team.

DNA3000

Don't u guys think leaders of alliances who are running successfully for quite some time should get some appreciation?

I mean if rewards for specially leaders are introduced there will be hell lotta problem, everyone will open their own alliance and all.

I am just asking isn't it a good idea to bring some titles as appreciation to leaders? Say those titles will vary from leaders of gold plat and bronze alliances and all. But only titles. I mean as leaders we do lots of hardwork and all.. Isn't easy to maintain 30 members, plan aw, plan aq and most importantly recruit lol.

Everyone's response is welcomed but i will prefer only leader of alliances reply to this post.

What does the mod think regarding this. Will be helpful if they reply! Thanks

As someone that has been an officer and alliance leader for years, I think alliance leaders and officers are often underappreciated. However, they are also often horrible. I think the good ones deserve to be appreciated by their members, but that's about it. Any reward or recognition from the game itself wouldn't account for whether or not the player deserved it. Only the alliance members can decide that.

As for myself, I run the alliance, but I serve the members. If they are happy, I'm happy. I don't really need anything more than that.

GinjabredMonsta

Well at least we should get a title named" hated by all non leaders and non officers" after checking the number of disagrees in here. LOL

Ah, so you're a leader wanting a title. Was thinking maybe you just loved your Ali leader ao much

The_man001

Thanks @DNA3000 and @BitterSteel for your views

The_man001

Well at least we should get a title named" hated by all non leaders and non officers" after checking the number of disagrees in here. LOL
Ah, so you're a leader wanting a title. Was thinking maybe you just loved your Ali leader ao much

Yes leading 2 alliances till now on 2 separate accounts(one for more than 2 years another for 1). Have plans to do more.

Wubbie075

Don't u guys think leaders of alliances who are running successfully for quite some time should get some appreciation?

I mean if rewards for specially leaders are introduced there will be hell lotta problem, everyone will open their own alliance and all.

I am just asking isn't it a good idea to bring some titles as appreciation to leaders? Say those titles will vary from leaders of gold plat and bronze alliances and all. But only titles. I mean as leaders we do lots of hardwork and all.. Isn't easy to maintain 30 members, plan aw, plan aq and most importantly recruit lol.

Everyone's response is welcomed but i will prefer only leader of alliances reply to this post.

What does the mod think regarding this. Will be helpful if they reply! Thanks
As someone that has been an officer and alliance leader for years, I think alliance leaders and officers are often underappreciated. However, they are also often horrible. I think the good ones deserve to be appreciated by their members, but that's about it. Any reward or recognition from the game itself wouldn't account for whether or not the player deserved it. Only the alliance members can decide that.

As for myself, I run the alliance, but I serve the members. If they are happy, I'm happy. I don't really need anything more than that.

We appreciate you Boss!! Especially for putting up with our frequently baffling and dopey decisions lol

EDIT: ok, ok... MY frequently baffling and dopey decisions *sigh*

Chatterofforums

Don't u guys think leaders of alliances who are running successfully for quite some time should get some appreciation?

I mean if rewards for specially leaders are introduced there will be hell lotta problem, everyone will open their own alliance and all.

I am just asking isn't it a good idea to bring some titles as appreciation to leaders? Say those titles will vary from leaders of gold plat and bronze alliances and all. But only titles. I mean as leaders we do lots of hardwork and all.. Isn't easy to maintain 30 members, plan aw, plan aq and most importantly recruit lol.

Everyone's response is welcomed but i will prefer only leader of alliances reply to this post.

What does the mod think regarding this. Will be helpful if they reply! Thanks

So you only want people with the same individual biases as you to respond?

Angryneeson52

Nah I don’t think alliance leaders need any recognition from the game. Having officers and members doing there part in making the alliance successful is recognition enough for me as a leader.

If a member doesn’t pull weight, or dies in war they get kicked before the next war, no need low skilled or inactive members.

The_man001

Don't u guys think leaders of alliances who are running successfully for quite some time should get some appreciation?

I mean if rewards for specially leaders are introduced there will be hell lotta problem, everyone will open their own alliance and all.

I am just asking isn't it a good idea to bring some titles as appreciation to leaders? Say those titles will vary from leaders of gold plat and bronze alliances and all. But only titles. I mean as leaders we do lots of hardwork and all.. Isn't easy to maintain 30 members, plan aw, plan aq and most importantly recruit lol.

Everyone's response is welcomed but i will prefer only leader of alliances reply to this post.

What does the mod think regarding this. Will be helpful if they reply! Thanks
So you only want people with the same individual biases as you to respond?

Well this thread has been quite a few days old. But just to clear ur confusion i will say yes.
Say suppose people want advice for 7.4 exploration, abyss guide and they created a discussion for it.Just as People who aren't abyss or themselves didn't get 7.4 explored shouldn't advice or guide on that thread (some even mention that on post just like i did) in the same way people who aren't leaders and officers shouldn't comment in this one. U can't advise or speak bu****** about things u haven't experienced or are not in a position.

Plus i said i preferred alliance leaders response and everyone's else opinion is welcomed. I regret that latter part. Of course those who aren't leaders or officers won't want leaders or officers to get extra anything.

JohnLocke117

Nope Dattebayo

GinjabredMonsta

Don't u guys think leaders of alliances who are running successfully for quite some time should get some appreciation?

I mean if rewards for specially leaders are introduced there will be hell lotta problem, everyone will open their own alliance and all.

I am just asking isn't it a good idea to bring some titles as appreciation to leaders? Say those titles will vary from leaders of gold plat and bronze alliances and all. But only titles. I mean as leaders we do lots of hardwork and all.. Isn't easy to maintain 30 members, plan aw, plan aq and most importantly recruit lol.

Everyone's response is welcomed but i will prefer only leader of alliances reply to this post.

What does the mod think regarding this. Will be helpful if they reply! Thanks
So you only want people with the same individual biases as you to respond?
Of course those who aren't leaders or officers won't want leaders or officers to get extra anything.

That's not true. You've had leaders in here who disagrees and said they didn't want anything extra. I lead an alliance for a small bit of time, and my opinion is that when things are working, it shows I'm doing a good job as well as my officers and that's fine enough. I personally tried to get my members gifts during gifting events as well as I give my leader a GGC every event just to show my appreciation for being an awesome leader and dealing with my laziness. I think if members want to give leaders or officers something, that's fine, but it shouldn't he something expected or yearned for. The only thing I'd be cool with would be if leaders and officers had a little badge on their profile to show they are the leader or officer in their alliance.

The_man001

Don't u guys think leaders of alliances who are running successfully for quite some time should get some appreciation?

I mean if rewards for specially leaders are introduced there will be hell lotta problem, everyone will open their own alliance and all.

I am just asking isn't it a good idea to bring some titles as appreciation to leaders? Say those titles will vary from leaders of gold plat and bronze alliances and all. But only titles. I mean as leaders we do lots of hardwork and all.. Isn't easy to maintain 30 members, plan aw, plan aq and most importantly recruit lol.

Everyone's response is welcomed but i will prefer only leader of alliances reply to this post.

What does the mod think regarding this. Will be helpful if they reply! Thanks
So you only want people with the same individual biases as you to respond?
Of course those who aren't leaders or officers won't want leaders or officers to get extra anything.
That's not true. You've had leaders in here who disagrees and said they didn't want anything extra. I lead an alliance for a small bit of time, and my opinion is that when things are working, it shows I'm doing a good job as well as my officers and that's fine enough. I personally tried to get my members gifts during gifting events as well as I give my leader a GGC every event just to show my appreciation for being an awesome leader and dealing with my laziness. I think if members want to give leaders or officers something, that's fine, but it shouldn't he something expected or yearned for. The only thing I'd be cool with would be if leaders and officers had a little badge on their profile to show they are the leader or officer in their alliance.

Yes I told in the previous msg that's why its for leaders and officers. Even some leaders and officers won't want this.

But for those who are members or never lead any ally ever there won't be one of them to support this idea

Pikolu

I retired and am an officer of a noob alliance. I don't deserve a title, and quite frankly, don't need a title. My satisfaction is found in watching people throw r5 5*s at my boss island and still dying a ton in war.

Seriously, have in-game recognition is a dumb idea. Even if it was only good alliances who achieved something, what would that implementation look like? Would it be the alliances that are #1 war and AQ? By that point, there really is no need for a title since they get one anyways.

The_man001

I retired and am an officer of a noob alliance. I don't deserve a title, and quite frankly, don't need a title. My satisfaction is found in watching people throw r5 5*s at my boss island and still dying a ton in war.

Seriously, have in-game recognition is a dumb idea. Even if it was only good alliances who achieved something, what would that implementation look like? Would it be the alliances that are #1 war and AQ? By that point, there really is no need for a title since they get one anyways.

I haven't thought thoroughly about implementation. But like some aw tier and aq score would be considered and for how long the alliance maybe running?

Like some alliance reach plat 1 for 1 season and next season whole alliance falls.

Alliance leaders running alliances for 2 years or more isn't a joke.

Pikolu

I retired and am an officer of a noob alliance. I don't deserve a title, and quite frankly, don't need a title. My satisfaction is found in watching people throw r5 5*s at my boss island and still dying a ton in war.

Seriously, have in-game recognition is a dumb idea. Even if it was only good alliances who achieved something, what would that implementation look like? Would it be the alliances that are #1 war and AQ? By that point, there really is no need for a title since they get one anyways.
I haven't thought thoroughly about implementation. But like some aw tier and aq score would be considered and for how long the alliance maybe running?

Like some alliance reach plat 1 for 1 season and next season whole alliance falls.

Alliance leaders running alliances for 2 years or more isn't a joke.

Again, implementation of that will be horrendous. There are over 16,000 alliances in the game, and doing something like that would be calculating a lot of data over the past 2 years for each alliance. This would be something needed to be done regularly, which would take a ton of time, and also put a lot of strain on server. The servers are fragile enough as is, and I don't think it would be worth the time and money to implement this. I recommend finding self-satisfaction over an in-game incentive.

The_man001

I retired and am an officer of a noob alliance. I don't deserve a title, and quite frankly, don't need a title. My satisfaction is found in watching people throw r5 5*s at my boss island and still dying a ton in war.

Seriously, have in-game recognition is a dumb idea. Even if it was only good alliances who achieved something, what would that implementation look like? Would it be the alliances that are #1 war and AQ? By that point, there really is no need for a title since they get one anyways.
I haven't thought thoroughly about implementation. But like some aw tier and aq score would be considered and for how long the alliance maybe running?

Like some alliance reach plat 1 for 1 season and next season whole alliance falls.

Alliance leaders running alliances for 2 years or more isn't a joke.
Again, implementation of that will be horrendous. There are over 16,000 alliances in the game, and doing something like that would be calculating a lot of data over the past 2 years for each alliance. This would be something needed to be done regularly, which would take a ton of time, and also put a lot of strain on server. The servers are fragile enough as is, and I don't think it would be worth the time and money to implement this. I recommend finding self-satisfaction over an in-game incentive.

We have alliance establishment date on alliance details given. And each season performance is also shown. Will not be easy to implement off course but not be very hectic either i guess