6* Magik? 6* Quake?
Dragon_Sword
Member Posts: 25 ★
Magik and Quake are not the most OP champs in the game. Can Kabam start introducing 6* versions of Magik, Quake, and any other old champs that are not in the 6* pool? If you ask most if they want Magik or Quake over Hercules or Doom, 90% will probably want Hercules or Doom. It would be great if every champ in the game will have 6* versions. No champ should be excluded just because players become too skilled in using a particular champ.
Should you delete 6* Kamala Khan because Swedeah is extremely skilled in using her?
Should you delete 6* Kitty Pride because Legacy thinks she's the best in the game (or one of the best)?
Please update the 6* pool to include all the missing champs. This will NOT break the game. It would probably make the majority of the players happy to see their useful champs make it to the 6* pool.
Should you delete 6* Kamala Khan because Swedeah is extremely skilled in using her?
Should you delete 6* Kitty Pride because Legacy thinks she's the best in the game (or one of the best)?
Please update the 6* pool to include all the missing champs. This will NOT break the game. It would probably make the majority of the players happy to see their useful champs make it to the 6* pool.
10
Comments
Have you seen 6* Ghost with tech boost? Finish fight in war in under 20 seconds.
No champion should be excluded from the 6* pool. Let the players choose who they want to play as a 6*, not limit their options
You limit the choices of the designers by having a 6* quake and the game would be all the worse for it.
I'm a heavy quake user and I support her not being released as a 6*. Magik, on the otherhand can be considered.
That being said, I do think Kabam does the right thing by not releasing a 6* Quake. She is too OP. If you don't think she's better than the top-tier champs released recently, that's probably just due to you not having seen what a top-tier player can do with Quake. She shuts down basically every node in the game. Every ability in the game. You can defeat opponents without even touching them. In the early days after her release, people got banned when using her because their fully legitimate skill with her was registered as cheating by Kabam's anti-cheating systems.
Hercules and Kitty are designed to be as good as they are. Quake's dominance...well, it was more of an accident. An accident that made her able to breeze through basically every piece of content in the game. She was even an MVP in the Gauntlet, if I'm not mistaken. So I think Kabam is definitely doing the right thing by keeping her out of the 6* pool.
But as I said - 6* Magik? Hell yeah!
Quake can bypass difficult nodes?
I can also say Hercules is breaking the game... or Ghost with tech boost is too OP.
I'm not saying to nerf Hercules or Ghost. I'm just saying no champs should be excluded from the 6* pool. It isn't right and doesn't seem to be complete if not every champ is allowed to be in the 6* pool.
OP champs depend on the player using it. Using Quake and Magik takes skills, not everyone is able to use them properly.
If they want sales to sky rocket, it would be in the form of releasing these champs as 6*, and they can include them in the Q2 or Q3 earnings to try to sway investors.
This is probably going to be a driving factor into releasing the champs. More of a corporate strategy rather than a "game economy" strategy.
With that being said, sure quake can bypass a lot of nodes in the game, but there are a lot of strong counters now. And with the increased health pools, would you honestly rather quake and shake for 10 minutes on one fight, or have it done with a strong countering champ in under 2-3 minutes? I dont know about ya'll, but if it takes more than 3 rotations on quake I'd be more liable to use other champs to save my thumbs the trouble.
My main point is to not exclude any champ as there are already other counters that can be used. Having them added only gives another option for players to have fun playing with.
The problem is if you dont have 6* Quake less people will be willing to learn her playstyle because it takes time and less people will know how to play her in general.
Don't exclude any champ from the 6* pool. Quake, Magik, and Wolverine should join the 6* roster.
If some 6* are excluded, years down the road, when 7* are available, will there be more that CAN'T join the 7* roster? That's years down the road but shouldn't start having that type of incomplete roster in the game.
Come on KABAM!!! Give us 6* Quake and Magik!
the biggest problem is her limbo damage. the practically unavoidable damage that you suffer just by existing when fighting her. you can really only ever reduce it. not stop it. (in 9/10 scenarios)
Magik's limbo damage is not unavoidable, plenty of champs can counter her. Archangel does great, as does blade since she is a dimensional being, then there are champs with large energy resistances like guardian who I think lower her damage, plus many other ability accuracy reducers (a fair amount of skill champs). Then there are other champs who counter magik effectively by controlling her power, such as voodoo or even magik herself who will only take 1 or 2 limbos then power lock her the rest of the fight.
and i can feel how i want to feel about it.
i am not stating how i feel about it,
nor does that matter.
yes quake is far more powerful.
is there more powerful champs than magik? well yea.
the logic behind it is the combination of her power control and limbo damage.
you can say all you want there are ways to avoid her limbo damage, and there are some, but there also really isn't that many in the scheme of how many champs there are.
and its not just how easy/hard it is to avoid but also the potency.
kabam would have made the decision a long time ago not to make her as a 6* when she would have been seen to be a lot more powerful and destructive then she is today.
I also never said her damage was fully unavoidable.
but it is also one of the most unavoidable forms of damage in the game.
so when couple with her utility of attack it does make her pretty powerful.
once again i am not telling you how to feel, nor to agree or disagree she is too powerful.
i am just providing what i believe to be the reasoning kabam are using when deciding these things.