**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Eternity of Pain reminder for Thronebreakers
Malreck04
Posts: 3,323 ★★★★★
Keep in mind that the highest amount of rewards you can get, you can get with sixteen points.
So, if you have done all the objectives the preceding weeks, then there will be one objective(out of four) that you can leave out without losing out on any rewards.
So, if you have done all the objectives the preceding weeks, then there will be one objective(out of four) that you can leave out without losing out on any rewards.
I know there will be some of you who will do it anyway because masochist/revives in overflow
19
Comments