For example, if a particular piece of content they're releasing is made much easier than intended by this interaction, then it becomes a priority.
This one is simple. Whether it’s a bug or not does not matter. The only sensible solution is to change the description rather than change the ability. That will not upset anybody. He may not be as intended but neither is he game breaking.Just change the description in the game and everyone’s happy. Cool, so all the dex, parry and input issues can just be part of the game right? Don't fix the bugs, just make them part of the game? I have MM as an R3. I took him up knowing about the big and played like he was normal. I don't care if they fix him or leave him the way he is. I don't use him enough to have that strong of an opinion. But to say " don't fix a bug because it makes the community happy" just isn't how things work. Ya, ButWhy did it take 2 years to fix a simple bug.Why did they not openly declare its a bug.Why after multiple threads on the issue not one official reply from kabam saying it's a big.This is just insult of loyal player base. It didn't take 2 years. It was Feb/Mar of 2021. Just over a year. I don't know what your definition of a simple bug is but I highly doubt it's the real definition or as simple as you think. But I'm sure you're a professional programmer with decades of experience.I still think they did. They moved a thread here- https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/300851/is-mole-man-still-bugged-with-his-true-accuracy-and-frenzy-skill-r-3-4-gem to bugs section. I can't find any MOD comment so I can't say for sure. They knew it was and they should have commented but I can't tell you why they didn't. It's not really an insult. You knew about.the bug because you commented on the thread I posted. You're taking as an insult because of the length of time and it's actually being fixed. You, like many are overreacting. The real issue is the lack of communication and confirmation from Kabam on the issue but don't pretend it wasn't widely known. Why are you defending kabam, when any normal person would know what kabam is doing here is not correct ethically. Did you not read the last paragraph? I'm not defending them. I'm pointing out errors on both sides of the aisle. Be mad about the communication. That's issue to be upset about. Don't be mad they fixed a bug because that's what's supposed to happen. Well you are defending them when you take time to find out previous posts and all.If I sold you a Dimond set it had a Dimond more than promised and I come back a year later and ask you to give that one Dimond of the necklace, the set is broken.So you would ask for a full refund or keep the broken set?
This one is simple. Whether it’s a bug or not does not matter. The only sensible solution is to change the description rather than change the ability. That will not upset anybody. He may not be as intended but neither is he game breaking.Just change the description in the game and everyone’s happy. Cool, so all the dex, parry and input issues can just be part of the game right? Don't fix the bugs, just make them part of the game? I have MM as an R3. I took him up knowing about the big and played like he was normal. I don't care if they fix him or leave him the way he is. I don't use him enough to have that strong of an opinion. But to say " don't fix a bug because it makes the community happy" just isn't how things work. Ya, ButWhy did it take 2 years to fix a simple bug.Why did they not openly declare its a bug.Why after multiple threads on the issue not one official reply from kabam saying it's a big.This is just insult of loyal player base. It didn't take 2 years. It was Feb/Mar of 2021. Just over a year. I don't know what your definition of a simple bug is but I highly doubt it's the real definition or as simple as you think. But I'm sure you're a professional programmer with decades of experience.I still think they did. They moved a thread here- https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/300851/is-mole-man-still-bugged-with-his-true-accuracy-and-frenzy-skill-r-3-4-gem to bugs section. I can't find any MOD comment so I can't say for sure. They knew it was and they should have commented but I can't tell you why they didn't. It's not really an insult. You knew about.the bug because you commented on the thread I posted. You're taking as an insult because of the length of time and it's actually being fixed. You, like many are overreacting. The real issue is the lack of communication and confirmation from Kabam on the issue but don't pretend it wasn't widely known. Why are you defending kabam, when any normal person would know what kabam is doing here is not correct ethically. Did you not read the last paragraph? I'm not defending them. I'm pointing out errors on both sides of the aisle. Be mad about the communication. That's issue to be upset about. Don't be mad they fixed a bug because that's what's supposed to happen.
This one is simple. Whether it’s a bug or not does not matter. The only sensible solution is to change the description rather than change the ability. That will not upset anybody. He may not be as intended but neither is he game breaking.Just change the description in the game and everyone’s happy. Cool, so all the dex, parry and input issues can just be part of the game right? Don't fix the bugs, just make them part of the game? I have MM as an R3. I took him up knowing about the big and played like he was normal. I don't care if they fix him or leave him the way he is. I don't use him enough to have that strong of an opinion. But to say " don't fix a bug because it makes the community happy" just isn't how things work. Ya, ButWhy did it take 2 years to fix a simple bug.Why did they not openly declare its a bug.Why after multiple threads on the issue not one official reply from kabam saying it's a big.This is just insult of loyal player base. It didn't take 2 years. It was Feb/Mar of 2021. Just over a year. I don't know what your definition of a simple bug is but I highly doubt it's the real definition or as simple as you think. But I'm sure you're a professional programmer with decades of experience.I still think they did. They moved a thread here- https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/300851/is-mole-man-still-bugged-with-his-true-accuracy-and-frenzy-skill-r-3-4-gem to bugs section. I can't find any MOD comment so I can't say for sure. They knew it was and they should have commented but I can't tell you why they didn't. It's not really an insult. You knew about.the bug because you commented on the thread I posted. You're taking as an insult because of the length of time and it's actually being fixed. You, like many are overreacting. The real issue is the lack of communication and confirmation from Kabam on the issue but don't pretend it wasn't widely known. Why are you defending kabam, when any normal person would know what kabam is doing here is not correct ethically.
This one is simple. Whether it’s a bug or not does not matter. The only sensible solution is to change the description rather than change the ability. That will not upset anybody. He may not be as intended but neither is he game breaking.Just change the description in the game and everyone’s happy. Cool, so all the dex, parry and input issues can just be part of the game right? Don't fix the bugs, just make them part of the game? I have MM as an R3. I took him up knowing about the big and played like he was normal. I don't care if they fix him or leave him the way he is. I don't use him enough to have that strong of an opinion. But to say " don't fix a bug because it makes the community happy" just isn't how things work. Ya, ButWhy did it take 2 years to fix a simple bug.Why did they not openly declare its a bug.Why after multiple threads on the issue not one official reply from kabam saying it's a big.This is just insult of loyal player base. It didn't take 2 years. It was Feb/Mar of 2021. Just over a year. I don't know what your definition of a simple bug is but I highly doubt it's the real definition or as simple as you think. But I'm sure you're a professional programmer with decades of experience.I still think they did. They moved a thread here- https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/300851/is-mole-man-still-bugged-with-his-true-accuracy-and-frenzy-skill-r-3-4-gem to bugs section. I can't find any MOD comment so I can't say for sure. They knew it was and they should have commented but I can't tell you why they didn't. It's not really an insult. You knew about.the bug because you commented on the thread I posted. You're taking as an insult because of the length of time and it's actually being fixed. You, like many are overreacting. The real issue is the lack of communication and confirmation from Kabam on the issue but don't pretend it wasn't widely known.
This one is simple. Whether it’s a bug or not does not matter. The only sensible solution is to change the description rather than change the ability. That will not upset anybody. He may not be as intended but neither is he game breaking.Just change the description in the game and everyone’s happy. Cool, so all the dex, parry and input issues can just be part of the game right? Don't fix the bugs, just make them part of the game? I have MM as an R3. I took him up knowing about the big and played like he was normal. I don't care if they fix him or leave him the way he is. I don't use him enough to have that strong of an opinion. But to say " don't fix a bug because it makes the community happy" just isn't how things work. Ya, ButWhy did it take 2 years to fix a simple bug.Why did they not openly declare its a bug.Why after multiple threads on the issue not one official reply from kabam saying it's a big.This is just insult of loyal player base.
This one is simple. Whether it’s a bug or not does not matter. The only sensible solution is to change the description rather than change the ability. That will not upset anybody. He may not be as intended but neither is he game breaking.Just change the description in the game and everyone’s happy. Cool, so all the dex, parry and input issues can just be part of the game right? Don't fix the bugs, just make them part of the game? I have MM as an R3. I took him up knowing about the big and played like he was normal. I don't care if they fix him or leave him the way he is. I don't use him enough to have that strong of an opinion. But to say " don't fix a bug because it makes the community happy" just isn't how things work.
This one is simple. Whether it’s a bug or not does not matter. The only sensible solution is to change the description rather than change the ability. That will not upset anybody. He may not be as intended but neither is he game breaking.Just change the description in the game and everyone’s happy.
Why did you rank him up knowing he was bugged? Tbh there’s so much of this game that’s filled with unexpected interactions that it’s hard to keep track of what is and isn’t bugged, and that’s from someone who has clearly spent too long on the forums where they’re allegedly documented. I realise in this case that it’s a fairly documented case but it is akin to saying don’t rank up Apocalypse because his horseman prefight is bugged, which I found out to my chagrin in the middle of an AoL path. What I’d like to see is a comprehensive list of all the known bugs in one pinned topic bullet pointed with any impending actions being annotated but I guess I’m probably weeing in the wind.
Why did you rank him up knowing he was bugged?
This one is simple. Whether it’s a bug or not does not matter. The only sensible solution is to change the description rather than change the ability. That will not upset anybody. He may not be as intended but neither is he game breaking.Just change the description in the game and everyone’s happy. Cool, so all the dex, parry and input issues can just be part of the game right? Don't fix the bugs, just make them part of the game? I have MM as an R3. I took him up knowing about the big and played like he was normal. I don't care if they fix him or leave him the way he is. I don't use him enough to have that strong of an opinion. But to say " don't fix a bug because it makes the community happy" just isn't how things work. I did not say don’t fix a bug because it makes the community happy. I said it would be a better solution to change the description in game. The fact that this is not an official bug from what I can see on forums is also relevant but I didn’t go down that route in my argument because that was not what I was trying to say.
There's no expiration date on a bug. If it's not intended, then it's subject to fixing whenever. Sure. And if the team leaves it in place for a year and half, fails to respond to players asking about it and doesn’t explicitly call it out in easy to find locations, there’s also reliance that deserves redress. Dr. Zola So because they didn't fix it immediately, they changed the fact that it was a bug? Strawmanning. I trust you can see there’s a fair gap between “immediately” and “a year and a half—with no readily findable comment.”Dr. Zola That's where I disagree. A bug is a bug, day 1 after, or 20 years after. You can't argue with kind of reasoning.. there are even regulations in several areas/disciplines that if you do not adress an issue or have taken actions nor adress it.. it should be considered that the current situation as - is should be accepted ? Squatter’s rights lol
There's no expiration date on a bug. If it's not intended, then it's subject to fixing whenever. Sure. And if the team leaves it in place for a year and half, fails to respond to players asking about it and doesn’t explicitly call it out in easy to find locations, there’s also reliance that deserves redress. Dr. Zola So because they didn't fix it immediately, they changed the fact that it was a bug? Strawmanning. I trust you can see there’s a fair gap between “immediately” and “a year and a half—with no readily findable comment.”Dr. Zola That's where I disagree. A bug is a bug, day 1 after, or 20 years after. You can't argue with kind of reasoning.. there are even regulations in several areas/disciplines that if you do not adress an issue or have taken actions nor adress it.. it should be considered that the current situation as - is should be accepted ?
There's no expiration date on a bug. If it's not intended, then it's subject to fixing whenever. Sure. And if the team leaves it in place for a year and half, fails to respond to players asking about it and doesn’t explicitly call it out in easy to find locations, there’s also reliance that deserves redress. Dr. Zola So because they didn't fix it immediately, they changed the fact that it was a bug? Strawmanning. I trust you can see there’s a fair gap between “immediately” and “a year and a half—with no readily findable comment.”Dr. Zola That's where I disagree. A bug is a bug, day 1 after, or 20 years after.
There's no expiration date on a bug. If it's not intended, then it's subject to fixing whenever. Sure. And if the team leaves it in place for a year and half, fails to respond to players asking about it and doesn’t explicitly call it out in easy to find locations, there’s also reliance that deserves redress. Dr. Zola So because they didn't fix it immediately, they changed the fact that it was a bug? Strawmanning. I trust you can see there’s a fair gap between “immediately” and “a year and a half—with no readily findable comment.”Dr. Zola
There's no expiration date on a bug. If it's not intended, then it's subject to fixing whenever. Sure. And if the team leaves it in place for a year and half, fails to respond to players asking about it and doesn’t explicitly call it out in easy to find locations, there’s also reliance that deserves redress. Dr. Zola So because they didn't fix it immediately, they changed the fact that it was a bug?
There's no expiration date on a bug. If it's not intended, then it's subject to fixing whenever. Sure. And if the team leaves it in place for a year and half, fails to respond to players asking about it and doesn’t explicitly call it out in easy to find locations, there’s also reliance that deserves redress. Dr. Zola
There's no expiration date on a bug. If it's not intended, then it's subject to fixing whenever.
Why did you rank him up knowing he was bugged? Tbh there’s so much of this game that’s filled with unexpected interactions that it’s hard to keep track of what is and isn’t bugged, and that’s from someone who has clearly spent too long on the forums where they’re allegedly documented. I realise in this case that it’s a fairly documented case but it is akin to saying don’t rank up Apocalypse because his horseman prefight is bugged, which I found out to my chagrin in the middle of an AoL path. What I’d like to see is a comprehensive list of all the known bugs in one pinned topic bullet pointed with any impending actions being annotated but I guess I’m probably weeing in the wind. My comment was for a thread that seems to have gotten merged and the comment deleted so it seems like a random question in this thread. The person I said this to knew he was bugged when they ranked MM.
This one is simple. Whether it’s a bug or not does not matter. The only sensible solution is to change the description rather than change the ability. That will not upset anybody. He may not be as intended but neither is he game breaking.Just change the description in the game and everyone’s happy. Cool, so all the dex, parry and input issues can just be part of the game right? Don't fix the bugs, just make them part of the game? I have MM as an R3. I took him up knowing about the big and played like he was normal. I don't care if they fix him or leave him the way he is. I don't use him enough to have that strong of an opinion. But to say " don't fix a bug because it makes the community happy" just isn't how things work. I did not say don’t fix a bug because it makes the community happy. I said it would be a better solution to change the description in game. The fact that this is not an official bug from what I can see on forums is also relevant but I didn’t go down that route in my argument because that was not what I was trying to say. Changing the description is the same as not fixing it 🤦
This one is simple. Whether it’s a bug or not does not matter. The only sensible solution is to change the description rather than change the ability. That will not upset anybody. He may not be as intended but neither is he game breaking.Just change the description in the game and everyone’s happy. Cool, so all the dex, parry and input issues can just be part of the game right? Don't fix the bugs, just make them part of the game? I have MM as an R3. I took him up knowing about the big and played like he was normal. I don't care if they fix him or leave him the way he is. I don't use him enough to have that strong of an opinion. But to say " don't fix a bug because it makes the community happy" just isn't how things work. I did not say don’t fix a bug because it makes the community happy. I said it would be a better solution to change the description in game. The fact that this is not an official bug from what I can see on forums is also relevant but I didn’t go down that route in my argument because that was not what I was trying to say. Changing the description is the same as not fixing it 🤦 Depends on the definition of fixing it. I read a lot of people here saying that the description did not match the abilities, not a lot saying that the champion was broken good.I for one wish they had changed the description but I’ll keep using him regardless.
This one is simple. Whether it’s a bug or not does not matter. The only sensible solution is to change the description rather than change the ability. That will not upset anybody. He may not be as intended but neither is he game breaking.Just change the description in the game and everyone’s happy. Cool, so all the dex, parry and input issues can just be part of the game right? Don't fix the bugs, just make them part of the game? I have MM as an R3. I took him up knowing about the big and played like he was normal. I don't care if they fix him or leave him the way he is. I don't use him enough to have that strong of an opinion. But to say " don't fix a bug because it makes the community happy" just isn't how things work. Ya, ButWhy did it take 2 years to fix a simple bug.Why did they not openly declare its a bug.Why after multiple threads on the issue not one official reply from kabam saying it's a big.This is just insult of loyal player base. It didn't take 2 years. It was Feb/Mar of 2021. Just over a year. I don't know what your definition of a simple bug is but I highly doubt it's the real definition or as simple as you think. But I'm sure you're a professional programmer with decades of experience.I still think they did. They moved a thread here- https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/300851/is-mole-man-still-bugged-with-his-true-accuracy-and-frenzy-skill-r-3-4-gem to bugs section. I can't find any MOD comment so I can't say for sure. They knew it was and they should have commented but I can't tell you why they didn't. It's not really an insult. You knew about.the bug because you commented on the thread I posted. You're taking as an insult because of the length of time and it's actually being fixed. You, like many are overreacting. The real issue is the lack of communication and confirmation from Kabam on the issue but don't pretend it wasn't widely known. The real issue is that you, as a player, which I suppose you are, are not upset by such a development. I mean there are issues where there can be very different opinions but I think the community comes together sometimes when some changes are universally acknowledged as bad. And yet here you are claiming it's all fair and just because the line in the ability list says so. As if it never ever occured that there was a mistake in some champ's ability description. Never ever. Right!
If I remember correctly they did acknowledge this as a bug that benefited the players and they chose to keep it as they were responding to pro player bugs getting fixed immediately and there point was they don't and used the MM bug as an example they also implied there were no plans to change it yet here we are
So I read in the release notes for the next update that you are going to heavily nerf moleman. He's been out for how long? 2 years now? Now you decide that keeping true strike while activating frenzy under 10 monster mass is a bug??? And you "fix it"? This is nuts! I ranked him up specifically because of how he works. Not being able to fight in frenzy if I need true strike makes him too damn slow and I don't wanna use him anymore. Is kabam going to issue rank down tickets? Because mine is a rank 3 6 star at the moment. Ah! Not to mention, he won't be useful for the carina's challengers abyss run. Which of course I have yet to do. But many others have completed the challenge with the help of mole man. This is very wrong on so many levels.
The wording of when MM kept TA never changed from his original release to after he was buffed. All that changed in the description is the amount of mass needed to lose it. The way it worked in game changed which is why plenty of us have been saying this would be fixed for over a year now.I get people not liking the change but you genuinely don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to being mad about it. People complain pro player bugs get fixed immediately and now are complaining they left this one in game for too long... come on.Should the communication have been better? Absolutely. Most people know what to expect as far as communication at this point though so if they aren't taking upon themselves to actually read and understand things, well that's on them.