The single champ that maybe fits this in my opinion is torch. There's almost no fights he doesn't work for and the very few he doesn't you were probably prepared to deal with. He would be fine if not for the prefight. The utility is still really good, miss counter, regen counter, dot. But with his prefight the guy is unstoppable. Nobody is immune to nova flames and they tear through everything. Nova flames are also passives, so they don't get purified. You have energy resistance, but anything with energy resistance also probably hands out smolders. One of the things that makes him crazy on top of that is that he pretty much has no rotation. You can play stun immune, only heavy, no specials, any combination based on the fight. I don't know if what your saying should or shouldn't be a thing but torch definitely comes to mind. The guy has great damage, great utility, no limits as far as immunities, and basically no rotation. Archangel is kinda similar in some ways but he needs matchups with neither of the 2 most common immunities, is risker if he can't parry, and can be unlucky sometimes(also aar). Point being you can place defenders where he wouldn't be ideal. Torch has mild inconveniences at best.I don't think he should be blacklisted or anything, but as far as broken goes he's way above everyone imo. Torch is the one that comes to my mind too. I hate that he has a permanent ban spot for me, it's like I get 2 bans per war coz everyone I match has him in their deck đ. The bans IMO are there to ban the cheese options, AA, Torch and CGR, I think not banning them is too risky in most metas from my own XP. Sometimes I'd like to ban others for strategic reasons but then by doing so I give them a cheese option. Kinda feels like one of those 6 of one and half a dozen of the other scenario. LOL The bans arenât simply there to ban the cheese options. I havenât been banning any of the 3 champions youâve mentioned all season and Iâm in the top 600 players at the moment. Perhaps try experimenting with other defenders that counter AA, torch etc. Rather than suggesting things that strip back and restrict the amount of choice the players get, maybe work on expanding your deck to give yourself a wider choice of options.
The single champ that maybe fits this in my opinion is torch. There's almost no fights he doesn't work for and the very few he doesn't you were probably prepared to deal with. He would be fine if not for the prefight. The utility is still really good, miss counter, regen counter, dot. But with his prefight the guy is unstoppable. Nobody is immune to nova flames and they tear through everything. Nova flames are also passives, so they don't get purified. You have energy resistance, but anything with energy resistance also probably hands out smolders. One of the things that makes him crazy on top of that is that he pretty much has no rotation. You can play stun immune, only heavy, no specials, any combination based on the fight. I don't know if what your saying should or shouldn't be a thing but torch definitely comes to mind. The guy has great damage, great utility, no limits as far as immunities, and basically no rotation. Archangel is kinda similar in some ways but he needs matchups with neither of the 2 most common immunities, is risker if he can't parry, and can be unlucky sometimes(also aar). Point being you can place defenders where he wouldn't be ideal. Torch has mild inconveniences at best.I don't think he should be blacklisted or anything, but as far as broken goes he's way above everyone imo. Torch is the one that comes to my mind too. I hate that he has a permanent ban spot for me, it's like I get 2 bans per war coz everyone I match has him in their deck đ. The bans IMO are there to ban the cheese options, AA, Torch and CGR, I think not banning them is too risky in most metas from my own XP. Sometimes I'd like to ban others for strategic reasons but then by doing so I give them a cheese option. Kinda feels like one of those 6 of one and half a dozen of the other scenario. LOL
The single champ that maybe fits this in my opinion is torch. There's almost no fights he doesn't work for and the very few he doesn't you were probably prepared to deal with. He would be fine if not for the prefight. The utility is still really good, miss counter, regen counter, dot. But with his prefight the guy is unstoppable. Nobody is immune to nova flames and they tear through everything. Nova flames are also passives, so they don't get purified. You have energy resistance, but anything with energy resistance also probably hands out smolders. One of the things that makes him crazy on top of that is that he pretty much has no rotation. You can play stun immune, only heavy, no specials, any combination based on the fight. I don't know if what your saying should or shouldn't be a thing but torch definitely comes to mind. The guy has great damage, great utility, no limits as far as immunities, and basically no rotation. Archangel is kinda similar in some ways but he needs matchups with neither of the 2 most common immunities, is risker if he can't parry, and can be unlucky sometimes(also aar). Point being you can place defenders where he wouldn't be ideal. Torch has mild inconveniences at best.I don't think he should be blacklisted or anything, but as far as broken goes he's way above everyone imo.
The single champ that maybe fits this in my opinion is torch. There's almost no fights he doesn't work for and the very few he doesn't you were probably prepared to deal with. He would be fine if not for the prefight. The utility is still really good, miss counter, regen counter, dot. But with his prefight the guy is unstoppable. Nobody is immune to nova flames and they tear through everything. Nova flames are also passives, so they don't get purified. You have energy resistance, but anything with energy resistance also probably hands out smolders. One of the things that makes him crazy on top of that is that he pretty much has no rotation. You can play stun immune, only heavy, no specials, any combination based on the fight. I don't know if what your saying should or shouldn't be a thing but torch definitely comes to mind. The guy has great damage, great utility, no limits as far as immunities, and basically no rotation. Archangel is kinda similar in some ways but he needs matchups with neither of the 2 most common immunities, is risker if he can't parry, and can be unlucky sometimes(also aar). Point being you can place defenders where he wouldn't be ideal. Torch has mild inconveniences at best.I don't think he should be blacklisted or anything, but as far as broken goes he's way above everyone imo. Torch is the one that comes to my mind too. I hate that he has a permanent ban spot for me, it's like I get 2 bans per war coz everyone I match has him in their deck đ. The bans IMO are there to ban the cheese options, AA, Torch and CGR, I think not banning them is too risky in most metas from my own XP. Sometimes I'd like to ban others for strategic reasons but then by doing so I give them a cheese option. Kinda feels like one of those 6 of one and half a dozen of the other scenario. LOL The bans arenât simply there to ban the cheese options. I havenât been banning any of the 3 champions youâve mentioned all season and Iâm in the top 600 players at the moment. Perhaps try experimenting with other defenders that counter AA, torch etc. Rather than suggesting things that strip back and restrict the amount of choice the players get, maybe work on expanding your deck to give yourself a wider choice of options. I'm trying to suggest something to make it more challenging......It's a skill based mode, nothing about cheering is skillful
The single champ that maybe fits this in my opinion is torch. There's almost no fights he doesn't work for and the very few he doesn't you were probably prepared to deal with. He would be fine if not for the prefight. The utility is still really good, miss counter, regen counter, dot. But with his prefight the guy is unstoppable. Nobody is immune to nova flames and they tear through everything. Nova flames are also passives, so they don't get purified. You have energy resistance, but anything with energy resistance also probably hands out smolders. One of the things that makes him crazy on top of that is that he pretty much has no rotation. You can play stun immune, only heavy, no specials, any combination based on the fight. I don't know if what your saying should or shouldn't be a thing but torch definitely comes to mind. The guy has great damage, great utility, no limits as far as immunities, and basically no rotation. Archangel is kinda similar in some ways but he needs matchups with neither of the 2 most common immunities, is risker if he can't parry, and can be unlucky sometimes(also aar). Point being you can place defenders where he wouldn't be ideal. Torch has mild inconveniences at best.I don't think he should be blacklisted or anything, but as far as broken goes he's way above everyone imo. Torch is the one that comes to my mind too. I hate that he has a permanent ban spot for me, it's like I get 2 bans per war coz everyone I match has him in their deck đ. The bans IMO are there to ban the cheese options, AA, Torch and CGR, I think not banning them is too risky in most metas from my own XP. Sometimes I'd like to ban others for strategic reasons but then by doing so I give them a cheese option. Kinda feels like one of those 6 of one and half a dozen of the other scenario. LOL The bans arenât simply there to ban the cheese options. I havenât been banning any of the 3 champions youâve mentioned all season and Iâm in the top 600 players at the moment. Perhaps try experimenting with other defenders that counter AA, torch etc. Rather than suggesting things that strip back and restrict the amount of choice the players get, maybe work on expanding your deck to give yourself a wider choice of options. I'm trying to suggest something to make it more challenging......It's a skill based mode, nothing about cheering is skillful Why does BGâs need to be more challenging? We already have specific weekly metas, with some being very restrictive (e.g. the autoblock meta). If I understand correctly, you want to a) restrict rosters with 3 initial bans b) restrict roster some more with weekly metaâs c) restrict roster even further with additional player-base wide bans. Doesnât sound so fun.
The single champ that maybe fits this in my opinion is torch. There's almost no fights he doesn't work for and the very few he doesn't you were probably prepared to deal with. He would be fine if not for the prefight. The utility is still really good, miss counter, regen counter, dot. But with his prefight the guy is unstoppable. Nobody is immune to nova flames and they tear through everything. Nova flames are also passives, so they don't get purified. You have energy resistance, but anything with energy resistance also probably hands out smolders. One of the things that makes him crazy on top of that is that he pretty much has no rotation. You can play stun immune, only heavy, no specials, any combination based on the fight. I don't know if what your saying should or shouldn't be a thing but torch definitely comes to mind. The guy has great damage, great utility, no limits as far as immunities, and basically no rotation. Archangel is kinda similar in some ways but he needs matchups with neither of the 2 most common immunities, is risker if he can't parry, and can be unlucky sometimes(also aar). Point being you can place defenders where he wouldn't be ideal. Torch has mild inconveniences at best.I don't think he should be blacklisted or anything, but as far as broken goes he's way above everyone imo. Torch is the one that comes to my mind too. I hate that he has a permanent ban spot for me, it's like I get 2 bans per war coz everyone I match has him in their deck đ. The bans IMO are there to ban the cheese options, AA, Torch and CGR, I think not banning them is too risky in most metas from my own XP. Sometimes I'd like to ban others for strategic reasons but then by doing so I give them a cheese option. Kinda feels like one of those 6 of one and half a dozen of the other scenario. LOL The bans arenât simply there to ban the cheese options. I havenât been banning any of the 3 champions youâve mentioned all season and Iâm in the top 600 players at the moment. Perhaps try experimenting with other defenders that counter AA, torch etc. Rather than suggesting things that strip back and restrict the amount of choice the players get, maybe work on expanding your deck to give yourself a wider choice of options. I'm trying to suggest something to make it more challenging......It's a skill based mode, nothing about cheering is skillful Why does BGâs need to be more challenging? We already have specific weekly metas, with some being very restrictive (e.g. the autoblock meta). If I understand correctly, you want to a) restrict rosters with 3 initial bans b) restrict roster some more with weekly metaâs c) restrict roster even further with additional player-base wide bans. Doesnât sound so fun. You've understood incorrectly. I just want a more challenging mode that doesn't award speed as highly as it does currently. I'll still play regardless but would be nice if true skill was awarded
The single champ that maybe fits this in my opinion is torch. There's almost no fights he doesn't work for and the very few he doesn't you were probably prepared to deal with. He would be fine if not for the prefight. The utility is still really good, miss counter, regen counter, dot. But with his prefight the guy is unstoppable. Nobody is immune to nova flames and they tear through everything. Nova flames are also passives, so they don't get purified. You have energy resistance, but anything with energy resistance also probably hands out smolders. One of the things that makes him crazy on top of that is that he pretty much has no rotation. You can play stun immune, only heavy, no specials, any combination based on the fight. I don't know if what your saying should or shouldn't be a thing but torch definitely comes to mind. The guy has great damage, great utility, no limits as far as immunities, and basically no rotation. Archangel is kinda similar in some ways but he needs matchups with neither of the 2 most common immunities, is risker if he can't parry, and can be unlucky sometimes(also aar). Point being you can place defenders where he wouldn't be ideal. Torch has mild inconveniences at best.I don't think he should be blacklisted or anything, but as far as broken goes he's way above everyone imo. Torch is the one that comes to my mind too. I hate that he has a permanent ban spot for me, it's like I get 2 bans per war coz everyone I match has him in their deck đ. The bans IMO are there to ban the cheese options, AA, Torch and CGR, I think not banning them is too risky in most metas from my own XP. Sometimes I'd like to ban others for strategic reasons but then by doing so I give them a cheese option. Kinda feels like one of those 6 of one and half a dozen of the other scenario. LOL The bans arenât simply there to ban the cheese options. I havenât been banning any of the 3 champions youâve mentioned all season and Iâm in the top 600 players at the moment. Perhaps try experimenting with other defenders that counter AA, torch etc. Rather than suggesting things that strip back and restrict the amount of choice the players get, maybe work on expanding your deck to give yourself a wider choice of options. I'm trying to suggest something to make it more challenging......It's a skill based mode, nothing about cheering is skillful Why does BGâs need to be more challenging? We already have specific weekly metas, with some being very restrictive (e.g. the autoblock meta). If I understand correctly, you want to a) restrict rosters with 3 initial bans b) restrict roster some more with weekly metaâs c) restrict roster even further with additional player-base wide bans. Doesnât sound so fun. You've understood incorrectly. I just want a more challenging mode that doesn't award speed as highly as it does currently. I'll still play regardless but would be nice if true skill was awarded The entire aim of the mode is to finish your fight faster, and with more health than your opponent. If you do that with champs other than torch/AA thatâs âtrue skillâ, but if you use those champs it isnât? Making zero sense here.
The single champ that maybe fits this in my opinion is torch. There's almost no fights he doesn't work for and the very few he doesn't you were probably prepared to deal with. He would be fine if not for the prefight. The utility is still really good, miss counter, regen counter, dot. But with his prefight the guy is unstoppable. Nobody is immune to nova flames and they tear through everything. Nova flames are also passives, so they don't get purified. You have energy resistance, but anything with energy resistance also probably hands out smolders. One of the things that makes him crazy on top of that is that he pretty much has no rotation. You can play stun immune, only heavy, no specials, any combination based on the fight. I don't know if what your saying should or shouldn't be a thing but torch definitely comes to mind. The guy has great damage, great utility, no limits as far as immunities, and basically no rotation. Archangel is kinda similar in some ways but he needs matchups with neither of the 2 most common immunities, is risker if he can't parry, and can be unlucky sometimes(also aar). Point being you can place defenders where he wouldn't be ideal. Torch has mild inconveniences at best.I don't think he should be blacklisted or anything, but as far as broken goes he's way above everyone imo. Torch is the one that comes to my mind too. I hate that he has a permanent ban spot for me, it's like I get 2 bans per war coz everyone I match has him in their deck đ. The bans IMO are there to ban the cheese options, AA, Torch and CGR, I think not banning them is too risky in most metas from my own XP. Sometimes I'd like to ban others for strategic reasons but then by doing so I give them a cheese option. Kinda feels like one of those 6 of one and half a dozen of the other scenario. LOL The bans arenât simply there to ban the cheese options. I havenât been banning any of the 3 champions youâve mentioned all season and Iâm in the top 600 players at the moment. Perhaps try experimenting with other defenders that counter AA, torch etc. Rather than suggesting things that strip back and restrict the amount of choice the players get, maybe work on expanding your deck to give yourself a wider choice of options. I'm trying to suggest something to make it more challenging......It's a skill based mode, nothing about cheering is skillful Why does BGâs need to be more challenging? We already have specific weekly metas, with some being very restrictive (e.g. the autoblock meta). If I understand correctly, you want to a) restrict rosters with 3 initial bans b) restrict roster some more with weekly metaâs c) restrict roster even further with additional player-base wide bans. Doesnât sound so fun. You've understood incorrectly. I just want a more challenging mode that doesn't award speed as highly as it does currently. I'll still play regardless but would be nice if true skill was awarded The entire aim of the mode is to finish your fight faster, and with more health than your opponent. If you do that with champs other than torch/AA thatâs âtrue skillâ, but if you use those champs it isnât? Making zero sense here. Beating Thing using Scorpion is skill - using Falcon is pure domination.Beating Kingpin or Moleman using Claire is skill - using Archangel is nuking.Beating Mystics using Mr Negative is skill - using Torch is not skill, it is ridiculous domination.Point is, there is a clear difference between using nukes like Falcon, Torch, Archangel to finish fights in seconds and using other champions where you actually have to think, use combos and keep count of roadblocks like rock stacks.
The single champ that maybe fits this in my opinion is torch. There's almost no fights he doesn't work for and the very few he doesn't you were probably prepared to deal with. He would be fine if not for the prefight. The utility is still really good, miss counter, regen counter, dot. But with his prefight the guy is unstoppable. Nobody is immune to nova flames and they tear through everything. Nova flames are also passives, so they don't get purified. You have energy resistance, but anything with energy resistance also probably hands out smolders. One of the things that makes him crazy on top of that is that he pretty much has no rotation. You can play stun immune, only heavy, no specials, any combination based on the fight. I don't know if what your saying should or shouldn't be a thing but torch definitely comes to mind. The guy has great damage, great utility, no limits as far as immunities, and basically no rotation. Archangel is kinda similar in some ways but he needs matchups with neither of the 2 most common immunities, is risker if he can't parry, and can be unlucky sometimes(also aar). Point being you can place defenders where he wouldn't be ideal. Torch has mild inconveniences at best.I don't think he should be blacklisted or anything, but as far as broken goes he's way above everyone imo. Torch is the one that comes to my mind too. I hate that he has a permanent ban spot for me, it's like I get 2 bans per war coz everyone I match has him in their deck đ. The bans IMO are there to ban the cheese options, AA, Torch and CGR, I think not banning them is too risky in most metas from my own XP. Sometimes I'd like to ban others for strategic reasons but then by doing so I give them a cheese option. Kinda feels like one of those 6 of one and half a dozen of the other scenario. LOL The bans arenât simply there to ban the cheese options. I havenât been banning any of the 3 champions youâve mentioned all season and Iâm in the top 600 players at the moment. Perhaps try experimenting with other defenders that counter AA, torch etc. Rather than suggesting things that strip back and restrict the amount of choice the players get, maybe work on expanding your deck to give yourself a wider choice of options. I'm trying to suggest something to make it more challenging......It's a skill based mode, nothing about cheering is skillful Why does BGâs need to be more challenging? We already have specific weekly metas, with some being very restrictive (e.g. the autoblock meta). If I understand correctly, you want to a) restrict rosters with 3 initial bans b) restrict roster some more with weekly metaâs c) restrict roster even further with additional player-base wide bans. Doesnât sound so fun. You've understood incorrectly. I just want a more challenging mode that doesn't award speed as highly as it does currently. I'll still play regardless but would be nice if true skill was awarded The entire aim of the mode is to finish your fight faster, and with more health than your opponent. If you do that with champs other than torch/AA thatâs âtrue skillâ, but if you use those champs it isnât? Making zero sense here. Beating Thing using Scorpion is skill - using Falcon is pure domination.Beating Kingpin or Moleman using Claire is skill - using Archangel is nuking.Beating Mystics using Mr Negative is skill - using Torch is not skill, it is ridiculous domination.Point is, there is a clear difference between using nukes like Falcon, Torch, Archangel to finish fights in seconds and using other champions where you actually have to think, use combos and keep count of roadblocks like rock stacks. This is possibly the worst argument Iâve ever seen in my time here on this forum. So we should just perma ban any champ that hard counters another champ? Ok gotcha đ¤Śđťââď¸
The single champ that maybe fits this in my opinion is torch. There's almost no fights he doesn't work for and the very few he doesn't you were probably prepared to deal with. He would be fine if not for the prefight. The utility is still really good, miss counter, regen counter, dot. But with his prefight the guy is unstoppable. Nobody is immune to nova flames and they tear through everything. Nova flames are also passives, so they don't get purified. You have energy resistance, but anything with energy resistance also probably hands out smolders. One of the things that makes him crazy on top of that is that he pretty much has no rotation. You can play stun immune, only heavy, no specials, any combination based on the fight. I don't know if what your saying should or shouldn't be a thing but torch definitely comes to mind. The guy has great damage, great utility, no limits as far as immunities, and basically no rotation. Archangel is kinda similar in some ways but he needs matchups with neither of the 2 most common immunities, is risker if he can't parry, and can be unlucky sometimes(also aar). Point being you can place defenders where he wouldn't be ideal. Torch has mild inconveniences at best.I don't think he should be blacklisted or anything, but as far as broken goes he's way above everyone imo. Torch is the one that comes to my mind too. I hate that he has a permanent ban spot for me, it's like I get 2 bans per war coz everyone I match has him in their deck đ. The bans IMO are there to ban the cheese options, AA, Torch and CGR, I think not banning them is too risky in most metas from my own XP. Sometimes I'd like to ban others for strategic reasons but then by doing so I give them a cheese option. Kinda feels like one of those 6 of one and half a dozen of the other scenario. LOL The bans arenât simply there to ban the cheese options. I havenât been banning any of the 3 champions youâve mentioned all season and Iâm in the top 600 players at the moment. Perhaps try experimenting with other defenders that counter AA, torch etc. Rather than suggesting things that strip back and restrict the amount of choice the players get, maybe work on expanding your deck to give yourself a wider choice of options. I'm trying to suggest something to make it more challenging......It's a skill based mode, nothing about cheering is skillful Why does BGâs need to be more challenging? We already have specific weekly metas, with some being very restrictive (e.g. the autoblock meta). If I understand correctly, you want to a) restrict rosters with 3 initial bans b) restrict roster some more with weekly metaâs c) restrict roster even further with additional player-base wide bans. Doesnât sound so fun. You've understood incorrectly. I just want a more challenging mode that doesn't award speed as highly as it does currently. I'll still play regardless but would be nice if true skill was awarded The entire aim of the mode is to finish your fight faster, and with more health than your opponent. If you do that with champs other than torch/AA thatâs âtrue skillâ, but if you use those champs it isnât? Making zero sense here. Beating Thing using Scorpion is skill - using Falcon is pure domination.Beating Kingpin or Moleman using Claire is skill - using Archangel is nuking.Beating Mystics using Mr Negative is skill - using Torch is not skill, it is ridiculous domination.Point is, there is a clear difference between using nukes like Falcon, Torch, Archangel to finish fights in seconds and using other champions where you actually have to think, use combos and keep count of roadblocks like rock stacks. This is possibly the worst argument Iâve ever seen in my time here on this forum. So we should just perma ban any champ that hard counters another champ? Ok gotcha đ¤Śđťââď¸ Lol In that case, since you're so smart please explain to us why the War global ban was introduced to restrict top nuke champions like Torch, Spiderman 2099, Hercules, Kingpin? Was it just for fun or for the sake of it?
I thought about it and I realized it's my fault for trying to make unreasonable people see reason. I apologize for trying to make you understand simple logic and thus engaging in pointless arguments. I'm quite sure the people disagreeing to the blacklist idea pretty much just like melting opponents using Human Torch and other nukes for easy wins. In every match I've had, there's not a single opponent that hasn't picked Human Torch. If not for easy wins, why else would you be so opposed to the idea of a global ban? After all, it was introduced to war for a reason. If you think using Nova Flames, Locked on and Neurotoxins is skillful then you really don't understand what actual skill in this game is and I won't waste my time trying to educate you.
I thought about it and I realized it's my fault for trying to make unreasonable people see reason. I apologize for trying to make you understand simple logic and thus engaging in pointless arguments. I'm quite sure the people disagreeing to the blacklist idea pretty much just like melting opponents using Human Torch and other nukes for easy wins. In every match I've had, there's not a single opponent that hasn't picked Human Torch. If not for easy wins, why else would you be so opposed to the idea of a global ban? After all, it was introduced to war for a reason. If you think using Nova Flames, Locked on and Neurotoxins is skillful then you really don't understand what actual skill in this game is and I won't waste my time trying to educate you. Your problem here is youâre assuming that people are set in their ways for easy wins and that your the one with logic and everyone else is being unreasonable. Youâre being just as unreasonable at the moment and thinking youâre clearly right and everyone else is wrong and blind. Thatâs ignorant
Hell no. Itâs a competition. If you canât beat that champ, time to learn. Such an ignorant response.... get good đ¤Śââď¸ like anyone has actually complained about any one defender and not knowing hot to fight them.
Hell no. Itâs a competition. If you canât beat that champ, time to learn.
Hell no. Itâs a competition. If you canât beat that champ, time to learn. Such an ignorant response.... get good đ¤Śââď¸ like anyone has actually complained about any one defender and not knowing hot to fight them. How is it ignorance when there is already a choice to ban 3 champs? Ban the champs you donât like. You donât need a global blacklist for additional bans. I suck against ebony maw but because I have him on deck too, I donât ban him. I just have to learn to deal with him if ebony is a defender.
Hell no. Itâs a competition. If you canât beat that champ, time to learn. Such an ignorant response.... get good đ¤Śââď¸ like anyone has actually complained about any one defender and not knowing hot to fight them. How is it ignorance when there is already a choice to ban 3 champs? Ban the champs you donât like. You donât need a global blacklist for additional bans. I suck against ebony maw but because I have him on deck too, I donât ban him. I just have to learn to deal with him if ebony is a defender. Because you're making assumptions that I am struggling to fight a certain champ. That is not the case. Clearly you're mis reading my initial post.
Hell no. Itâs a competition. If you canât beat that champ, time to learn. Such an ignorant response.... get good đ¤Śââď¸ like anyone has actually complained about any one defender and not knowing hot to fight them. How is it ignorance when there is already a choice to ban 3 champs? Ban the champs you donât like. You donât need a global blacklist for additional bans. I suck against ebony maw but because I have him on deck too, I donât ban him. I just have to learn to deal with him if ebony is a defender. Because you're making assumptions that I am struggling to fight a certain champ. That is not the case. Clearly you're mis reading my initial post. This is your first post, mentioning many pita defenders. That indicate you hate certain defenders and want it ban from global. âI think it would be a welcome addition to the mode, there's too many pita defenders and cheese options for attackers to pick just 3.â
And what is wrong with that comment? Itâs fact. Itâs a mode where everyone can compete for the same rewards. No separate league.
I just love how everyone assumes I'm suggesting this because I am struggling with x y or z đ¤Śââď¸. Explain why you think it's a good idea then. I don't see how having more champs be unusable, makes the mode more enjoyable. It would only hurt smaller accounts and make it harder for them to compete with bigger accounts. It would actually make for a more uneven playing field.
I just love how everyone assumes I'm suggesting this because I am struggling with x y or z đ¤Śââď¸.