BG priorities? It was fun while it lasted

PandingoPandingo Member Posts: 1,067 ★★★★
in General Discussion
Imo. Having to play against sandbaggers is way more fun than having to constantly play against modders. I tried both sandbagging and full r3+ champ decks and frankly the matchmaking was way more fair when sandbagging. Plus I actually got to play and didn't constantly waste resources. I'm thinking this is gunna kill the whole mode. Which is a shame. I actually enjoyed it a lot.

Comments

  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,444 ★★★★★
    edited December 2022
    How you could you claim it was more fair? Lol manipulating your deck to match an account that's miles below yours and doesn't stand chance is not fair at all.
    I feel bad for the top players that never sandbagged and are getting screwed over by matchmaking now, the ones that did sandbag like you though, well deserved that's all I'm gonna say :)
  • MackeyMackey Member Posts: 1,597 ★★★★★
    Sandbagging is never fair, if you load up your deck with 50% 1* and rest top champs then it's certainly not fair for your opponent. If you alter your deck so that it's just r5 5* then I would say it's fair if you faced an account of similar deck strength as you're both in the same.boat... equally, if 2 sandbagger met, that's probably a fair match also
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • SnakepSnakep Member Posts: 362 ★★★
    Colinwhitworth69 said:

    You’re a cheater.

    Not a cheater, he didn’t break any rules at all. Just someone with a low moral compass. I’d equate it to when running a race, if someone falls down, the person who helps them back up is celebrated even if it cost them the race. The people in favor or sandbagging to get easier matchups is like the guy that runs over both of those other racers just to make sure he can win his race.
Sign In or Register to comment.