For those who like it, what's your prestige/total hero rating?I'm guessing you're not fighting 15.8k+ only matches. 10.8k Prestige, overall hero rating 1.897 million. Have a deep roster of decent 5 and some pretty top 6 stars to pull from to try this meta. Matches if I lose in this meta are over faster, period, as long as I'm not encountering anyone hitting the pause to run out the clock that many of you recommend. Other metas I can wait for upwards of a minute/minute and a half for my opponent if I had a bad draw to finish. This meta, we're done roughly the same time frame from most matches. For me, that's a win. Climbing the ladder is always frustrating at the beginning of any BG season, but we also had a ton of resources gifted to us at the end of last BG that means I have 20 some matches Kabam has paid for to try and get to the silver tiers if I can. I have been back and forth on Battlegrounds in the past, but this meta rewards deeper rosters and those who play arena probably have some of the top champs leveled because they're the same problematic people you've encountered in arenas, just wwith some added ways to make the fights a little more challenging. It's not a meta for everyone, and if more people are dropping out because it's no fun, hey better rewards for those of us who power through it in the long run.
For those who like it, what's your prestige/total hero rating?I'm guessing you're not fighting 15.8k+ only matches.
And here come the complaint posts…We’ve had weeks to prepare for these nodes. If you haven’t ranked up champs to counter them then that’s on you.
As a mid tier cav player I feel like I don't have the roster to even compete. Seems way more tailored to higher tiered players with developed rosters. Not overly concerned cause I'll just sit this season out but it seems like a good way to turn off a lot of lower accts in the game mode, especially in VT.
The people saying “get a deeper roster” really miss the fact that Kabam isn’t offering a guaranteed return on investment for these rankups. The meta might not return for months, if at all. I’ve got 9 r4 champs, 37 r3, and another 14 r2. Thats an average of ten champs per class before you get to 50 max 5-stars (35ish of which are not ranked as 6-stars). If I’m ranking a bad champ to fit a niche node for a 4-week window, the value of that champ might be zero after a month. Meanwhile, I pulled real champs on cyber weekend that I’m still ranking and I’m hoping for some of the new featured champs.
The problem as i see it is for the VT, this meta is simply too restrictive and places far too much emphisis on a very specific roster and then RNG in the draft processI think this is a good learning opportunity for Kabam. This is not a VT meta, this is not what the majority of casual players want to deal with. If you want to do this, put it in the GC, where the big boys want to play and compete for the top rewards. I dont think this combination is out place there. But this is not the place for it.The more i play it the more i think this is really a big time swing and miss by Kabam. And im winning more than i lose and am progressing through the VT at a rate im OK with. But we really need to developers to understand the player base that enjoys this game mode and is enjoying it casually, which i think is the majority, and then those who are competing for the top 100-200-500... Forcing casual players to deal with this level of specificity is simply not reasonable.