Options
Kabam - Regarding AW season 39.
Xaro
Posts: 13 ★
I will do my best not to express my true feelings towards the management team, as what I need to say is important.
I’m sure you understand the issue with the lack of responsiveness you showed in the first wars of the season that tie breakers gave the loser the points over the winner.
The correct way to have solved that was immediately extend the match making timer, remove the points AND the rating for +/-
What you did do, was nothing. Which resulted in a ripple affect that can’t be undone. As DSVG got credit for a win they were not suppose to have, it altered every single master matchup for the entire season. You can’t just simply remove the points and think that is sufficient. The match making for DSVG was leaps and bounds harder than any other alliance. We earned those points by the end of the season.
By all means, newn deserves the points added to them now, but their schedule was also altered for easier match ups.
The ramifications for the actions you did not take then, and the excessive actions you are trying to make now will be very high.
I’m sure you understand the issue with the lack of responsiveness you showed in the first wars of the season that tie breakers gave the loser the points over the winner.
The correct way to have solved that was immediately extend the match making timer, remove the points AND the rating for +/-
What you did do, was nothing. Which resulted in a ripple affect that can’t be undone. As DSVG got credit for a win they were not suppose to have, it altered every single master matchup for the entire season. You can’t just simply remove the points and think that is sufficient. The match making for DSVG was leaps and bounds harder than any other alliance. We earned those points by the end of the season.
By all means, newn deserves the points added to them now, but their schedule was also altered for easier match ups.
The ramifications for the actions you did not take then, and the excessive actions you are trying to make now will be very high.
Post edited by Kabam Miike on
8
Comments
Some master alliances had such an easy laughable schedule, and some p1 alliances averaging 15 deaths a war climbed into masters.
On the other hand, we had unlucky master alliances with absolutely horrendous matchups war after war, losing with an average of 4-6 deaths a war.
now we have multiple UNDESERVING alliances that avoided ALL master matchups sitting in masters and those with horrible schedules sitting in p1.
Matchmaking NEEDS to be looked at ASAP. This stuff doesnt fly.
I don’t know why the matches during season have to be repeated. Someone has to play top 3-5 alliances twice per season, it’s not exactly fair imo
I’m sure every alliance would appreciate more variety in matches (and that would make it more balanced) rather than repeating the same schedule of tough or easy opponents twice a season
It’s a lottery at this point
Doesn’t matter how good the alliance is (unless they are top 3), so much depends on schedule
Either you get lucky or you don’t
To add some context
lol
what shady practices, mod. shame on you guys.
- we mucked up
- We know there is inherent issues which we are looking at resolving in the future
- Sorry but it is what it is
Anything is better than nothing, saying nothing in any industry and just deleting/hiding/shying away from an issue is seen as a flaw…
At the moment all we have seen is, posts regarding this be deleted, thread is not being bumped during new comments and a lack customer relations