@Kabam Miike whats the time frame on when it will be out?
They don’t need to do anything. You’ll get your information when they have it to share
Well considering kabam harps on saying they going to communicate with the players. They do. So unless you have something constructive to say. Don’t bother responding
@Kabam Miike whats the time frame on when it will be out?
They don’t need to do anything. You’ll get your information when they have it to share
What they do need to do is stick to their word which was to update us as soon as they received new information. So yes actually, they do need to do something. We were told by Zibiit that we would know about how many extra titles they would add and almost a month has passed since with absolutely no new information.
Their communication has been leagues better than it used to be. They may not have new info to share or didn’t have it in time to share before the weekend. We don’t know their full thing. Also, who are you to tell me not to bother responding? How is saying that someone needs to do something is more constructive than someone saying someone doesn’t need to do something. While it may be a long time that people needed to wait, there is most likely a process that is going on in the background regarding discussion on what happened and how they are going to make it as fair as possible. They are going to update when they have the information and are able to. It’s the weekend so if the information comes on the weekend then that’s awesome for the people who are waiting, but odds are the earliest will be Monday.
You said they don’t need to do anything. And not sure where you get their communication is leagues better. Cause every where I see it’s not. Ziibt said over a month ago there be more slot. He was asked how many. Nothing. Not a single word. Not even to say hey we still working on it. That’s communication. Not saying anything isnt
I'll be getting more information on this later today. Technical issues caused a delay in us getting the information required to evaluate Legends Run times. Will let you all know when I have more information, and how we'll be determining how many extra Legends will be awarded this month.
Let's be honest, "later today" shouldn't mean 3+ days, we still waiting an update
Sorry for the late response, everybody. I did have that meeting, but we didn't have confirmation on the plan until today.
So, there will be a total of 150 Legends crowned this month. One hundred from the pre-nerf and only 50 from the post-nerf. This is because most players still did their Legends run right away, and there weren't as many as we expected that did a run in earnest after the nerf.
I don't know exactly when they will be going out yet, but hopefully, we'll have more information soon.
Sorry for the late response, everybody. I did have that meeting, but we didn't have confirmation on the plan until today.
So, there will be a total of 150 Legends crowned this month. One hundred from the pre-nerf and only 50 from the post-nerf. This is because most players still did their Legends run right away, and there weren't as many as we expected that did a run in earnest after the nerf.
I don't know exactly when they will be going out yet, but hopefully, we'll have more information soon.
Sorry for the late response, everybody. I did have that meeting, but we didn't have confirmation on the plan until today.
So, there will be a total of 150 Legends crowned this month. One hundred from the pre-nerf and only 50 from the post-nerf. This is because most players still did their Legends run right away, and there weren't as many as we expected that did a run in earnest after the nerf.
I don't know exactly when they will be going out yet, but hopefully, we'll have more information soon.
Alright, take your time, thanks mike for the heads up, we appreciate it, and let’s hope we all made it
Sorry for the late response, everybody. I did have that meeting, but we didn't have confirmation on the plan until today.
So, there will be a total of 150 Legends crowned this month. One hundred from the pre-nerf and only 50 from the post-nerf. This is because most players still did their Legends run right away, and there weren't as many as we expected that did a run in earnest after the nerf.
I don't know exactly when they will be going out yet, but hopefully, we'll have more information soon.
Thank you for the information Miike, we appreciate it
@Kabam Miike thanks for sharing. Will the cut off values be different for pre and post nerf runs? Could you please clarify what was meant by runs having been done earnestly?
@Kabam Miike thanks for sharing. Will the cut off values be different for pre and post nerf runs? Could you please clarify what was meant by runs having been done earnestly?
I’m gonna venture to say, yes, of course, the 100th spot cutoff time for those that did it before that certain change date may be a very different time that the 50th spot cutoff time for those that ran it after that change date.
Otherwise they would have just said they are increasing the overall # of qualifiers as a whole, but still basing it by top xxx fastest times no matter what time of month it was done.
What they didn’t want to see happen would be that if a huge portion of pre-nerf people would have gotten bumped out of placing by those with faster times post-nerf (even though there were less people who actually attempted the Legends post-nerf).
Sounds like (generalizing) there were about twice as many people who ran “decent” times (aka, below say 7 hours, for example) pre-nerf, than there were of people doing it post nerf with (for example) sub 6 hour times. (Assuming, again for example, that pre-nerf cutoff time was maybe 5 hrs, versus a cutoff time post-nerf being faster at say 4 hrs.)
**I’d bet their system would show a rather steep drop-off at some point in run times, say after maybe like 7 or 8 hrs, and then with a very low participation for times longer than that until you get to maybe a couple days duration (which is where you might find participation increasing again for people who were in no way attempting a Legend run but wanting to just do it casually but still quickly for the 100% rewards). So that's what Miike probably meant by “in earnest”, like runs of sub 6 or 7 hr (or 8 hr maybe pre-nerf).
@Kabam Miike thanks for sharing. Will the cut off values be different for pre and post nerf runs? Could you please clarify what was meant by runs having been done earnestly?
I’m gonna venture to say, yes, of course, the 100th spot cutoff time for those that did it before that certain change date may be a very different time that the 50th spot cutoff time for those that ran it after that change date.
Otherwise they would have just said they are increasing the overall # of qualifiers as a whole, but still basing it by top xxx fastest times no matter what time of month it was done.
What they didn’t want to see happen would be that if a huge portion of pre-nerf people would have gotten bumped out of placing by those with faster times post-nerf (even though there were less people who actually attempted the Legends post-nerf).
Sounds like (generalizing) there were about twice as many people who ran “decent” times (aka, below say 7 hours, for example) pre-nerf, than there were of people doing it post nerf with (for example) sub 6 hour times. (Assuming, again for example, that pre-nerf cutoff time was maybe 5 hrs, versus a cutoff time post-nerf being faster at say 4 hrs.)
**I’d bet their system would show a rather steep drop-off at some point in run times, say after maybe like 7 or 8 hrs, and then with a very low participation for times longer than that until you get to maybe a couple days duration (which is where you might find participation increasing again for people who were in no way attempting a Legend run but wanting to just do it casually but still quickly for the 100% rewards). So that's what Miike probably meant by “in earnest”, like runs of sub 6 or 7 hr (or 8 hr maybe pre-nerf).
I’m fairly certain they were using 5 hours as a round number to illustrate a point. I didn’t get the impression they were specifically saying any time as cutoff.
We’ll just need to wait and see. We can guess all we want but Jan was different that previous months. It’ll probably take a month or two to really pinpoint a cutoff for future months.
Personally I’m happy Kabam is measuring pre and post nerf differently. If I get it or not I won’t feel cheated.
@Kabam Miike thanks for sharing. Will the cut off values be different for pre and post nerf runs? Could you please clarify what was meant by runs having been done earnestly?
I’m gonna venture to say, yes, of course, the 100th spot cutoff time for those that did it before that certain change date may be a very different time that the 50th spot cutoff time for those that ran it after that change date.
Otherwise they would have just said they are increasing the overall # of qualifiers as a whole, but still basing it by top xxx fastest times no matter what time of month it was done.
What they didn’t want to see happen would be that if a huge portion of pre-nerf people would have gotten bumped out of placing by those with faster times post-nerf (even though there were less people who actually attempted the Legends post-nerf).
Sounds like (generalizing) there were about twice as many people who ran “decent” times (aka, below say 7 hours, for example) pre-nerf, than there were of people doing it post nerf with (for example) sub 6 hour times. (Assuming, again for example, that pre-nerf cutoff time was maybe 5 hrs, versus a cutoff time post-nerf being faster at say 4 hrs.)
**I’d bet their system would show a rather steep drop-off at some point in run times, say after maybe like 7 or 8 hrs, and then with a very low participation for times longer than that until you get to maybe a couple days duration (which is where you might find participation increasing again for people who were in no way attempting a Legend run but wanting to just do it casually but still quickly for the 100% rewards). So that's what Miike probably meant by “in earnest”, like runs of sub 6 or 7 hr (or 8 hr maybe pre-nerf).
Sorry for the late response, everybody. I did have that meeting, but we didn't have confirmation on the plan until today.
So, there will be a total of 150 Legends crowned this month. One hundred from the pre-nerf and only 50 from the post-nerf. This is because most players still did their Legends run right away, and there weren't as many as we expected that did a run in earnest after the nerf.
I don't know exactly when they will be going out yet, but hopefully, we'll have more information soon.
Hi guys! Can you please post your time for us to see? I also tried for legend's run but did not get the title. My time was 4:36 post nerf. There are 2 "Big boss" on the list, and neither is me. So please upload on what to expect in near future. Thank you!
Hi guys! Can you please post your time for us to see? I also tried for legend's run but did not get the title. My time was 4:36 post nerf. There are 2 "Big boss" on the list, and neither is me. So please upload on what to expect in near future. Thank you!
I got a time of 4:26 pre nerf and ended up towards the bottom of the list, I did get the title though
Hi guys! Can you please post your time for us to see? I also tried for legend's run but did not get the title. My time was 4:36 post nerf. There are 2 "Big boss" on the list, and neither is me. So please upload on what to expect in near future. Thank you!
I got a time of 4:26 pre nerf and ended up towards the bottom of the list, I did get the title though
3:28 post nerf 21st on the list... guessing those 50 post nerf times are mostly in the top of the list barring some really good times from some of the pre nerf fellows.
Hi guys! Can you please post your time for us to see? I also tried for legend's run but did not get the title. My time was 4:36 post nerf. There are 2 "Big boss" on the list, and neither is me. So please upload on what to expect in near future. Thank you!
I do not understand one thing... Why Kabam is not making Hall of legends post more insightful? Why do not they post next to the legends name their time, team and device? Finding those information is not easy. Amount of information on the internet is not enough and many are old and I do not think that it would get vast majority of time...
I do not understand one thing... Why Kabam is not making Hall of legends post more insightful? Why do not they post next to the legends name their time, team and device? Finding those information is not easy. Amount of information on the internet is not enough and many are old and I do not think that it would get vast majority of time...
Getting that information requires reaching out to said person on the list & asking nicely if they'll tell you, some are very private some like myself do not care to share if asked for that information.
Comments
So, there will be a total of 150 Legends crowned this month. One hundred from the pre-nerf and only 50 from the post-nerf. This is because most players still did their Legends run right away, and there weren't as many as we expected that did a run in earnest after the nerf.
I don't know exactly when they will be going out yet, but hopefully, we'll have more information soon.
Otherwise they would have just said they are increasing the overall # of qualifiers as a whole, but still basing it by top xxx fastest times no matter what time of month it was done.
What they didn’t want to see happen would be that if a huge portion of pre-nerf people would have gotten bumped out of placing by those with faster times post-nerf (even though there were less people who actually attempted the Legends post-nerf).
Sounds like (generalizing) there were about twice as many people who ran “decent” times (aka, below say 7 hours, for example) pre-nerf, than there were of people doing it post nerf with (for example) sub 6 hour times.
(Assuming, again for example, that pre-nerf cutoff time was maybe 5 hrs, versus a cutoff time post-nerf being faster at say 4 hrs.)
**I’d bet their system would show a rather steep drop-off at some point in run times, say after maybe like 7 or 8 hrs, and then with a very low participation for times longer than that until you get to maybe a couple days duration (which is where you might find participation increasing again for people who were in no way attempting a Legend run but wanting to just do it casually but still quickly for the 100% rewards).
So that's what Miike probably meant by “in earnest”, like runs of sub 6 or 7 hr (or 8 hr maybe pre-nerf).
We’ll just need to wait and see. We can guess all we want but Jan was different that previous months. It’ll probably take a month or two to really pinpoint a cutoff for future months.
Personally I’m happy Kabam is measuring pre and post nerf differently. If I get it or not I won’t feel cheated.
https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/9833/hall-of-legends#latest
imo still set a goal for 3:50, January was an exception b/c of the changes made to the monthly EQ*