Scarlet Witch classic prestige

McocBestGameMcocBestGame Member Posts: 31 ★
in General Discussion
Dear Kabam,

can you update scarlet witch classic prestige please ? she is so looow. more half of 6r3 have more prestige than her 6r4 sig200...

she deserve better prestige

Comments

  • McocBestGameMcocBestGame Member Posts: 31 ★


    so a 6r5 sw classic have less prestige than a 6r3 ?

    it's normal?
  • FrostGiantLordFrostGiantLord Member Posts: 2,063 ★★★★
    Prestige doesn't really matter unless you're on the very top of the player base, or in an ultra competitive alliance. Just rank who you want
  • McocBestGameMcocBestGame Member Posts: 31 ★
    but...
    if you want r5 her. you will never see her on top of yours champions...

    she will still behind 6r3... where is the pleasure ?

    Will her get an update about it kabam ?
  • ButtehrsButtehrs Member Posts: 5,961 ★★★★★
    McocBestGame said:

    but...
    if you want r5 her. you will never see her on top of yours champions...

    she will still behind 6r3... where is the pleasure ?

    Will her get an update about it kabam ?

    Your only ever going to see 4 champs on your profile anyways out of hundreds. No one really cares what they are unless your trying for top 10 in aq.
  • PikoluPikolu Member, Guardian Posts: 7,773 Guardian
    Buttehrs said:

    McocBestGame said:

    but...
    if you want r5 her. you will never see her on top of yours champions...

    she will still behind 6r3... where is the pleasure ?

    Will her get an update about it kabam ?

    Your only ever going to see 4 champs on your profile anyways out of hundreds. No one really cares what they are unless your trying for top 10 in aq.
    In their defense, her bad prestige and not being able to flex a r5 on global was why I didn't r5 my switch 🤣
  • mgj0630mgj0630 Member Posts: 1,096 ★★★★
    I'm a firm believer that Kabam does this on purpose. They want the "great" champs to have lower prestige, cause now the folks that care about prestige for things like AQ, are ranking up two sets up champs, the ones to keep their prestige up, and the ones they use for questing.

    I give you exhibit A:

    This is the top 15 6*R4 champs.

    Now me personally, if I had to build a 5 man team to go into content where I don't know the enemies or node combinations I'm going to face, then I would probably only have three of those top 15 champs on my roster (Doom, Nimrod, and Hercules). But that means there are 4 other champs on that list that need to be ranked up if I want to play the prestige wars.

    It's basically just another way Kabam can monetize the game.
  • SquirrelguySquirrelguy Member Posts: 2,654 ★★★★★
    mgj0630 said:

    I'm a firm believer that Kabam does this on purpose. They want the "great" champs to have lower prestige, cause now the folks that care about prestige for things like AQ, are ranking up two sets up champs, the ones to keep their prestige up, and the ones they use for questing.

    I give you exhibit A:

    This is the top 15 6*R4 champs.

    Now me personally, if I had to build a 5 man team to go into content where I don't know the enemies or node combinations I'm going to face, then I would probably only have three of those top 15 champs on my roster (Doom, Nimrod, and Hercules). But that means there are 4 other champs on that list that need to be ranked up if I want to play the prestige wars.

    It's basically just another way Kabam can monetize the game.

    I mean.... I thought this was pretty obvious. I feel like most high-spenders understand that top prestige tends towards newer champs because it incentivizes spending on them even if their abilities aren't top tier. It kinda works in their favor too because players who want to do well but aren't willing to spend at least a decent amount of money can't be as competitive.
  • K00shMaanK00shMaan Member Posts: 1,289 ★★★★
    mgj0630 said:

    I'm a firm believer that Kabam does this on purpose. They want the "great" champs to have lower prestige, cause now the folks that care about prestige for things like AQ, are ranking up two sets up champs, the ones to keep their prestige up, and the ones they use for questing.

    I give you exhibit A:

    This is the top 15 6*R4 champs.

    Now me personally, if I had to build a 5 man team to go into content where I don't know the enemies or node combinations I'm going to face, then I would probably only have three of those top 15 champs on my roster (Doom, Nimrod, and Hercules). But that means there are 4 other champs on that list that need to be ranked up if I want to play the prestige wars.

    It's basically just another way Kabam can monetize the game.

    I think it has a little bit less to do with specifically making the high prestige champs not be good and more that they need to continually release newer champs with better prestige to get those people who hunt prestige to continue to spend more. Older champs are almost guaranteed to have worse prestige because of this, unless they've had it re-evaluated when they got buffed (like Rocket did). In Scarlet Witch's case, she's been somewhere between very good and S-Tier for her entire time in the contest and therefore never considered for a buff. I do agree though that I think that, at worst, every champion that is a Rank higher and at Sig 200 should be higher prestige than every unawakened champ a rank lower.
  • ege999menege999men Member Posts: 374 ★★
    We've had couple of unfortunate prestige only champs in the past. Namely Silver Surfer and ragnathor. Every other champ in top 15 prestige is incredibly good except maybe spider supreme and recently rocket.
  • PikoluPikolu Member, Guardian Posts: 7,773 Guardian
    ege999men said:

    We've had couple of unfortunate prestige only champs in the past. Namely Silver Surfer and ragnathor. Every other champ in top 15 prestige is incredibly good except maybe spider supreme and recently rocket.

    Spidey supreme and rocket are both very good. Rocket was my MVP on many paths in the 8.2 beta.
  • RenaxqqRenaxqq Member Posts: 1,639 ★★★★
    ege999men said:

    We've had couple of unfortunate prestige only champs in the past. Namely Silver Surfer and ragnathor. Every other champ in top 15 prestige is incredibly good except maybe spider supreme and recently rocket.

    Spiderman Supreme is very good. Soon players will realize that. Just some youtubers said he's bad and now everyone is saying that.
  • ege999menege999men Member Posts: 374 ★★
    That's why I said maybe, I don't have them to comment
  • WorknprogressWorknprogress Member Posts: 7,233 ★★★★★
    Surfer is far from a prestige only champ as well. He's been a staple as a BG attacker for many top level players across multiple metas.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.