Does duping 45 and 6* deserve same amount of iso?

JK_47

Comments

Gogeta91199

Dude why u making a poll out here? It’s literally a rhetorical question

Real_Madrid_76_2

'Greed is a character trait... Don't make it your reason to live'

Wise words from a summoner who was Kabammed

JK_47

Bugs and glitches yeah we understand it takes time and fix those..... But this is something that can be done in a hotfix or update.. Why haven't the community started requesting seriously

Squirrelguy

One could argue that Kabam could just lower the amount of iso obtained from 4* champs if you really want to see a steady progression.

Clearly players would always take more resources. The real question is wether or not that iso would fit into the economy of the game. Not if players "deserve" it. Anyone who is duping 5*/6* champs on the regular should also be pulling in quite a few 4* crystals to fund their rank-ups.

Elite13

Duping these champs should be an accomplishment and you should be rewarded the same no matter the star. And duping a 4* is easy the higher you get, so its basically free ISO

Mackey

5* are fine. I do think 6* should give a bit more though. But overall I'm happy enough as it is

Cvlr

Kabam reducing the iso gained from duping 4 e 5* in 3...2....1.......

SirGamesBond

It's like beating a dead horse again and again. We have not received a reply for years. Not expecting one now either.
They are aware and have done "some" things but can't say what and how.

And personally, I don't have iso issues, I have champion issues and r4 material issues. Can't pull few specific champs for a looong time. And r4 mats are rare as is.

DNA3000

Bugs and glitches yeah we understand it takes time and fix those..... But this is something that can be done in a hotfix or update.. Why haven't the community started requesting seriously

The players started requesting this several years ago. This hasn't been done yet because this is not something that can be done in a hotfix. Game economy changes are some of the hardest changes to advocate for, because a) they involve more developers in more areas of the game to review and approve them and b) the reasons for and against doing them are often not visible or known to the players. You can't argue effectively for a change when you don't know what the opposition to that change might be (or at least, its pretty hard).

I can't convince you to get tacos for lunch if I don't know if you hate Mexican food, don't know what tacos are, or are allergic to salsa, and you won't tell me which it is.

Kabam has tried to increase the ISO availability in the game in various ways. ISO is more prevalent as a reward at higher progression tiers, for example. But simply increasing the ISO players get for champion duplication doesn't actually hand more ISO to the players that need more ISO in a targeted manner. In fact, making that change would ironically hand the most ISO to the players who need it the least, as those are almost certainly the players that currently get a ton of ISO from opening a lot of champion crystals.

MikeHancho31

Surprisingly I'm fine with how it is now. I have around 5 or 6k iso. It's rank up materials that we need more of.

JK_47

@DNA3000 the stuff u said about game economy makes sense, yeah agreed probably lot of math has to be done and time should be taken before implementing changes on available resources....

But don't you think rewards must be proportional to time invested and efforts

JK_47

It's like they give me salsa for duping 4*, i want some tacos along with salsa but again i get salsa for duping 5* and 6*....where is my tacos....salsa everywhere..... LOL

Never mind, leave salsa and tacos out of it...

Let's just agree to Disregard everything u and me said about tacos

DNA3000

@DNA3000 the stuff u said about game economy makes sense, yeah agreed probably lot of math has to be done and time should be taken before implementing changes on available resources....

But don't you think rewards must be proportional to time invested and efforts

That is a factor, but not the only factor that's important for game rewards. For example, if calendar rewards were proportional to time invested and effort required, they'd be infinitesimal. The purpose of the reward, and how it fits into the greater game economy, are also factors to consider.

Whether the different pieces of the ISO economy actually make sense or not globally is something I've been looking at on a more quantitative basis. If you are interested, there are links at the bottom of this post to the series of posts up to this date. I've been working on the next part to that series, but it is extremely involved and I've been distracted from it a bit, due to a few things that have come up recently. So it may take some time to finish. But that next part specifically attempts to answer the question of whether or not dup ISO should scale, and if so in what way.

JK_47

With 7 stars being released don't you guys think it makes sense to get extra iso for duping higher rarity

Emilia90

Duping these champs should be an accomplishment and you should be rewarded the same no matter the star. And duping a 4* is easy the higher you get, so its basically free ISO

So…duping a champ is an accomplishment that we work toward and we should only be given the same thing regardless even though it’s much harder to work toward a 6* or 7* compared to a 4 or 5*? 6* level up costs are much higher and 24 iso does pretty much nothing for them.

JK_47

@Emilia90 appreciate if u can also vote