Brianodom2010 wrote: » Since Disney purchased the rights to Fantastic Four, and can appear in the Marvel films again, is there any chance we could get a FF quest and characters in MCoC??!!??
Dave_the_destroyer wrote: » Brianodom2010 wrote: » Since Disney purchased the rights to Fantastic Four, and can appear in the Marvel films again, is there any chance we could get a FF quest and characters in MCoC??!!?? the ink isnt even dry on the agreement, it will take at last 12-18 months to even get this agreed with all the Government bodies etc before it is completed. Maybe better to ask this when that is all done mate, but cant see it being top of the list of things to do in 3 years time when it is finally completed (if completed at all)
Dave_the_destroyer wrote: » @Solswerd No they wont, because they wont know until it is fully accepted and finalised. Plus, like I said, not really even on the to-do list, plus the F4 are rubbish anyway!
Dave_the_destroyer wrote: » @Solswerd Fox have 16 main companies at least, plus maybe another 30+ associated one as well? Nothing will happen until it is 100% done. These are grade C business people on a £100 billion deal. This is not important to them at all, and they would never risk money on something that isnt theirs yet
Solswerd wrote: » Dave_the_destroyer wrote: » @Solswerd Fox have 16 main companies at least, plus maybe another 30+ associated one as well? Nothing will happen until it is 100% done. These are grade C business people on a £100 billion deal. This is not important to them at all, and they would never risk money on something that isnt theirs yet How would Disney be risking any money? They already have the full rights to put the FF into videogames and comics without paying anyone...their whole strategy has been to avoid FF solely to keep Fox from making $$$ off of making more FF movies. If they feel confident that Fox will not make another FF movie...then their self-boycott is over. There is no financial risk to Marvel, if anything they would make money.
DNA3000 wrote: » Solswerd wrote: » Dave_the_destroyer wrote: » @Solswerd Fox have 16 main companies at least, plus maybe another 30+ associated one as well? Nothing will happen until it is 100% done. These are grade C business people on a £100 billion deal. This is not important to them at all, and they would never risk money on something that isnt theirs yet How would Disney be risking any money? They already have the full rights to put the FF into videogames and comics without paying anyone...their whole strategy has been to avoid FF solely to keep Fox from making $$$ off of making more FF movies. If they feel confident that Fox will not make another FF movie...then their self-boycott is over. There is no financial risk to Marvel, if anything they would make money. Actually, it is important to view all of these maneuvers through the appropriate lens. It wasn't Disney that shied away from promoting FF. It was Marvel Entertainment and specifically Isaac Perlmutter (president of Marvel) that apparently decided to torpedo the FF because of the conflict with Fox. This is important because until late 2015 Isaac Perlmutter was the one and only "final voice" in all of Marvel, as head of Marvel Entertainment. But because of his interference with the Marvel movies and conflict with Kevin Feige, Marvel Studios was removed from Marvel Entertainment and made a subsidiary of Disney Studios. Marvel Studios then became free to negotiate with other movie studios without approval from Marvel Entertainment itself. Things like the Deadpool deals and the Spiderman sharing with Sony became possibilities once Feige had the freedom to make deals free from Isaac Perlmutter's veto. In other words, "Marvel" was *never* going to get the rights to FF back, simply because in a very real sense "Marvel" as in Marvel Entertainment no longer really has control of the movies anymore. Legally they might have or not have production rights, but all of this is largely moot now. Whether they promote or bury the FF, Marvel Entertainment will never make a FF movie. Someone else will be doing that, whether it is a company that happens to share a part of their name or not. I suspect this greatly disincentivizes Marvel Entertainment and Isaac Perlmutter specifically from pursuing feuds as much as they did in the past. Nothing in it for them anymore. And clearly Disney doesn't have the same attitude as Perlmutter, as evidenced by the fact they were perfectly fine with Feige "borrowing" Spiderman from Sony. Perlmutter was willing to hurt his own company's intellectual property to fight Fox. But Disney seems to care less about who makes what money in the short term, and more about strengthening the overall intellectual property they ultimately own. The Spiderman deal with Sony undoubtedly strengthens their Marvel IP. They don't care if it also helps Sony in the short term.
Solswerd wrote: » DNA3000 wrote: » Solswerd wrote: » Dave_the_destroyer wrote: » @Solswerd Fox have 16 main companies at least, plus maybe another 30+ associated one as well? Nothing will happen until it is 100% done. These are grade C business people on a £100 billion deal. This is not important to them at all, and they would never risk money on something that isnt theirs yet How would Disney be risking any money? They already have the full rights to put the FF into videogames and comics without paying anyone...their whole strategy has been to avoid FF solely to keep Fox from making $$$ off of making more FF movies. If they feel confident that Fox will not make another FF movie...then their self-boycott is over. There is no financial risk to Marvel, if anything they would make money. Actually, it is important to view all of these maneuvers through the appropriate lens. It wasn't Disney that shied away from promoting FF. It was Marvel Entertainment and specifically Isaac Perlmutter (president of Marvel) that apparently decided to torpedo the FF because of the conflict with Fox. This is important because until late 2015 Isaac Perlmutter was the one and only "final voice" in all of Marvel, as head of Marvel Entertainment. But because of his interference with the Marvel movies and conflict with Kevin Feige, Marvel Studios was removed from Marvel Entertainment and made a subsidiary of Disney Studios. Marvel Studios then became free to negotiate with other movie studios without approval from Marvel Entertainment itself. Things like the Deadpool deals and the Spiderman sharing with Sony became possibilities once Feige had the freedom to make deals free from Isaac Perlmutter's veto. In other words, "Marvel" was *never* going to get the rights to FF back, simply because in a very real sense "Marvel" as in Marvel Entertainment no longer really has control of the movies anymore. Legally they might have or not have production rights, but all of this is largely moot now. Whether they promote or bury the FF, Marvel Entertainment will never make a FF movie. Someone else will be doing that, whether it is a company that happens to share a part of their name or not. I suspect this greatly disincentivizes Marvel Entertainment and Isaac Perlmutter specifically from pursuing feuds as much as they did in the past. Nothing in it for them anymore. And clearly Disney doesn't have the same attitude as Perlmutter, as evidenced by the fact they were perfectly fine with Feige "borrowing" Spiderman from Sony. Perlmutter was willing to hurt his own company's intellectual property to fight Fox. But Disney seems to care less about who makes what money in the short term, and more about strengthening the overall intellectual property they ultimately own. The Spiderman deal with Sony undoubtedly strengthens their Marvel IP. They don't care if it also helps Sony in the short term. Agree with you on the distinction you are making in regards to ownership...but I do argue that even with Perlmutter gone...some of that mentality still exists. The recent Marvel vs. Capcom release on consoles may even support this with it's total absense of mutants, including Wolverine. (he is easily one of the more popular champs in that game's history.) I do disagree with citing Spiderman and Deadpool as examples, since Marvel never stopped publishing their books as a response to their respective film rights. The Fantastic Four situation has always been treated differently. The point I was trying to make was in response to @Dave_the_destroyer saying that Marvel would not change how the FF are or are not utilized in their licensed games until the Fox sale was completely finalized...I disagree and think we will see them before that.
SpiritOfVengeance wrote: » They spent 54 billion I am sure they would wanna earn that and more back so to help out why would they not implement the fantastic 4 heroes and villains to promote them in the biggest mobile marvel game ever? Might be late but it will happen.
Solswerd wrote: » I do disagree with citing Spiderman and Deadpool as examples, since Marvel never stopped publishing their books as a response to their respective film rights. The Fantastic Four situation has always been treated differently.