Limit loyalty revives please

Comments

• BringPopcorn Member Posts: 5,124 ★★★★★

  February 16

  They explored a lot more than you did..
  Maybe you shouldn't play 3bgs with 23 people...

  26
• Jaycray81 Member Posts: 370 ★★

  February 16

  3 BGs boss wins gets us more points than 100% 2 BGs.

  0
• Jaycray81 Member Posts: 370 ★★

  February 16

  They wouldn't have explored more than us if they didn't have access to 200 revives.

  1
• djr17 Member Posts: 685 ★★★

  February 16

  You only took out 52 defenders. How many doubled up on paths for you? Did you do all 3 of the lead ins to the boss Islands? If not, use those revives and take out more nodes.

  5
• Jaycray81 Member Posts: 370 ★★

  February 16

  No one doubled up on paths. We don't do mandatory wars. We just go for 3 boss kills. Not worried about wins and losses or placement. Just seems dumb that a team can revive 200 times

  2
• Unyonface Member Posts: 617 ★★★

  February 16

  Sounds like you do care about wins and losses if your complaining about the opponent using tons of revives…

  8
• Rustyoneil Member Posts: 211 ★★

  February 16

  Jaycray81 said:

  3 BGs boss wins gets us more points than 100% 2 BGs.

  Then you should be able to live with the consequences of going in short handed. You had 23 people and only got 52 attacker kills, that’s why you lost. How about everyone at the very least clear a lane, then you would have won.
  

  5
• Jaycray81 Member Posts: 370 ★★

  February 16

  It does sound like that huh? The game caters to players with no actual skill.

  0
• SammyDe Member Posts: 1,094 ★★★

  February 16

  You focused on the wrong aspect of AW. Boss kill is important but so is exploration. You bet on 23 people can do more than 29 and you lost. Either go down to 2 BGs or get 7 more committed members to do AW.
  Sure it looked bad from your point of view but I think they showed commitment to persevere to explore more than your alliance. That’s a good win from their POV.

  7
• Jaycray81 Member Posts: 370 ★★

  February 16

  Yea great win for them. One day they might actually clear a fight in one shot b

  0
• Pikolu Member, Guardian Guardian › Posts: 7,732 Guardian

  February 16

  You're in a larger alliance facing a smaller alliance complaining about losing when you don't take wars seriously. You're just going to have to accept that not getting exploration will be a guaranteed loss when you're facing an alliance that is filled with determination.

  10
• Plantesan Member Posts: 335 ★★

  February 16

  Based on your ally sales pitch previously, why would this be an issue? (Might be worth keeping in mind deaths beyond the first 3 count against the defenders AB bonus. If the attackers only b-lined and died multiple times on say 3 champs…the death count becomes very misleading)

  2
• Jaycray81 Member Posts: 370 ★★

  February 16

  Determination lol

  0
• BringPopcorn Member Posts: 5,124 ★★★★★

  February 16

  Jaycray81 said:

  They wouldn't have explored more than us if they didn't have access to 200 revives.

  You had access to the same revives...
  You lost the moment you ran into 29 against your 23...

  5
• zuffy Member Posts: 2,246 ★★★★★

  February 16

  There is exploration for a reason.

  3
• phillgreen Member Posts: 4,110 ★★★★★

  February 16

  This is why we stopped doing war altogether. The 6 of us relied on strong defenders to roadblock the opponent since its difficult to explore with so few.
  
  

  0
• ReignkingTW Member Posts: 2,774 ★★★★★

  February 16

  Cry more
  
  Git gud
  
  Skill issue
  
  All apply

  3