Don’t be fooled by purchasing all the double track event items.

CulteeCultee Member Posts: 158 ★
edited March 13 in General Discussion
I purchased every single 1 day double track event, and every 7 day double track event item.
In the screenshot below and circled. It says purchase 1 platinum pass to receive all achieved platinum rewards instantly.
Then the other two offers it says you will unlock 7 days and 1 day for BOTH gold and platinum track instantly.
I purchased all of them and only received platinum track.





Comments

  • AmbjonyAmbjony Member Posts: 212 ★★
    You need to do the daily objectives to claim the gold track. What you buy is called platinum pass for a reason.
  • Sw0rdMasterSw0rdMaster Member Posts: 1,800 ★★★★
    Ambjony said:

    You need to do the daily objectives to claim the gold track. What you buy is called platinum pass for a reason.

    The wording said
    NoirSoirée said:

    Nowhere does it say your purchases will "unlock" the gold track rewards... wording matters.... the platinum pass says "instantly claim", the gold track related purchases say "instantly complete"

    the reason you are able to claim the platinum track rewards is related to the purchase of the platinum pass, as line 1 states it gives you access to "immediately claim" all achieved platinum track rewards... If you buy simply the one/seven day boosters but no platinum track, you would simply instantly "complete" not instantly "claim"

    It says will unlock both.

  • Sw0rdMasterSw0rdMaster Member Posts: 1,800 ★★★★
    NoirSoirée said:

    the line literally says instantly COMPLETE... NOT UNLOCK...

    Ok, i see what they mean, so come the next day it will unlock and complete, you don't need to do the objective.
  • ahmynutsahmynuts Member Posts: 7,714 ★★★★★
    edited March 13
    NoirSoirée said:

    currently a 3rd year law student, believe me when I say wording matters, on this matter Kabam is not offside on how they have advertised/promoted the victory track purchases

    I would hate for you to be my lawyer if this is how you are interpreting the clear wording here
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 5,634 ★★★★★
    ahmynuts said:

    NoirSoirée said:

    currently a 3rd year law student, believe me when I say wording matters, on this matter Kabam is not offside on how they have advertised/promoted the victory track purchases

    I would hate for you to be my lawyer if this is how you are interpreting the clear wording here
    Better call Saul before u go to jail again
  • NoirSoiréeNoirSoirée Member Posts: 30 ★
    ahmynuts said:

    NoirSoirée said:

    currently a 3rd year law student, believe me when I say wording matters, on this matter Kabam is not offside on how they have advertised/promoted the victory track purchases

    I would hate for you to be my lawyer if this is how you are interpreting the clear wording here
    Lmao, nice bait ;)

  • Wicket329Wicket329 Member Posts: 3,412 ★★★★★
    NoirSoirée said:

    currently a 3rd year law student, believe me when I say wording matters, on this matter Kabam is not offside on how they have advertised/promoted the victory track purchases

    Some friendly professional advice: it’s not worth it to bring up the legal education here unless it’s specifically a legal question being discussed. You’ll get plenty of mileage out of it when somebody threatens to sue Kabam (which has happened less often since Golivarez made his way out to pasture, but still comes up every now and again), but otherwise I’d avoid it.

    Big believer in “show, don’t tell.” Let your words and arguments prove your points, you don’t need to invoke credentials.
  • ahmynutsahmynuts Member Posts: 7,714 ★★★★★
    BringPopcorn said:

    ahmynuts said:

    NoirSoirée said:

    currently a 3rd year law student, believe me when I say wording matters, on this matter Kabam is not offside on how they have advertised/promoted the victory track purchases

    I would hate for you to be my lawyer if this is how you are interpreting the clear wording here
    Better call Saul before u go to jail again
    Why? I usually do nothing wrong to be sent to jail but this is the most nothing out of all of them lol
  • Wicket329Wicket329 Member Posts: 3,412 ★★★★★
    ahmynuts said:

    BringPopcorn said:

    ahmynuts said:

    NoirSoirée said:

    currently a 3rd year law student, believe me when I say wording matters, on this matter Kabam is not offside on how they have advertised/promoted the victory track purchases

    I would hate for you to be my lawyer if this is how you are interpreting the clear wording here
    Better call Saul before u go to jail again
    Why? I usually do nothing wrong to be sent to jail but this is the most nothing out of all of them lol
    Doing nothing wrong gets lots of people sent to jail 👀
  • ahmynutsahmynuts Member Posts: 7,714 ★★★★★
    Wicket329 said:

    ahmynuts said:

    BringPopcorn said:

    ahmynuts said:

    NoirSoirée said:

    currently a 3rd year law student, believe me when I say wording matters, on this matter Kabam is not offside on how they have advertised/promoted the victory track purchases

    I would hate for you to be my lawyer if this is how you are interpreting the clear wording here
    Better call Saul before u go to jail again
    Why? I usually do nothing wrong to be sent to jail but this is the most nothing out of all of them lol
    Doing nothing wrong gets lots of people sent to jail 👀
    Tell me about it
  • ahmynutsahmynuts Member Posts: 7,714 ★★★★★
    Wicket329 said:

    NoirSoirée said:

    currently a 3rd year law student, believe me when I say wording matters, on this matter Kabam is not offside on how they have advertised/promoted the victory track purchases

    Some friendly professional advice: it’s not worth it to bring up the legal education here unless it’s specifically a legal question being discussed. You’ll get plenty of mileage out of it when somebody threatens to sue Kabam (which has happened less often since Golivarez made his way out to pasture, but still comes up every now and again), but otherwise I’d avoid it.

    Big believer in “show, don’t tell.” Let your words and arguments prove your points, you don’t need to invoke credentials.
    Don't say his name. The wounds are still too fresh
  • Wicket329Wicket329 Member Posts: 3,412 ★★★★★
    ahmynuts said:

    Wicket329 said:

    NoirSoirée said:

    currently a 3rd year law student, believe me when I say wording matters, on this matter Kabam is not offside on how they have advertised/promoted the victory track purchases

    Some friendly professional advice: it’s not worth it to bring up the legal education here unless it’s specifically a legal question being discussed. You’ll get plenty of mileage out of it when somebody threatens to sue Kabam (which has happened less often since Golivarez made his way out to pasture, but still comes up every now and again), but otherwise I’d avoid it.

    Big believer in “show, don’t tell.” Let your words and arguments prove your points, you don’t need to invoke credentials.
    Don't say his name. The wounds are still too fresh
    Good point, don’t want to Beetlejuice him back here
  • klobberintymeklobberintyme Member Posts: 1,624 ★★★★
    laserjohn26 said:

    NoirSoirée said:

    currently a 3rd year law student, believe me when I say wording matters, on this matter Kabam is not offside on how they have advertised/promoted the victory track purchases

    Yeah, but what do you know about bird law?

  • NightheartNightheart Member Posts: 2,117 ★★★★
    ahmynuts said:

    Wicket329 said:

    NoirSoirée said:

    currently a 3rd year law student, believe me when I say wording matters, on this matter Kabam is not offside on how they have advertised/promoted the victory track purchases

    Some friendly professional advice: it’s not worth it to bring up the legal education here unless it’s specifically a legal question being discussed. You’ll get plenty of mileage out of it when somebody threatens to sue Kabam (which has happened less often since Golivarez made his way out to pasture, but still comes up every now and again), but otherwise I’d avoid it.

    Big believer in “show, don’t tell.” Let your words and arguments prove your points, you don’t need to invoke credentials.
    Don't say his name. The wounds are still too fresh
    Who is Golivarez was he another redfire?
  • JohnTargaryenJohnTargaryen Member Posts: 111 ★
    Bro didnt read 💀
  • Toproller89Toproller89 Member Posts: 1,019 ★★★
    Timelocked rewards, eh? Hate em 😒
Sign In or Register to comment.