**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Comments
All that said, don't hold your breath on drop rates. I won't believe we will see them until it actually happens. Until then, it ain't happening...
The odds will always suck, even if Apple users get their wish granted, I'm sure us android users will pay for it in the end
I'm not sure you understand how RNG works. It doesn't mean there's even disperison.
And as far as particular champs go.... Think like a gaming company. Would you give players an even chance to pull "gold" or **** with each pull? What sense would that make for your company? You'd have too many top level champs getting out there and needlessly lower the desire/need to grind/spend to get those top champs.
I don't know the inner workings of the company but computer math and probabilities are pretty widely known. So are business/gambling tactics. Plus, the more you hear people proclaiming rng, the more obvious the situation.
I know about apples new rules but they don't apply here.
You're not buying the crystals with money, even if you buy units to buy crystals you're still not buying crystals.
You buy X amount of units for X amount of money, you have a 100% chance to get that amount of units, what you then do with those units is up to you.
miike responsed and closed a thread of mine on the topic.
Let’s say there are 100 5* champs in a crystal. Now I’m only interested in 5 of them (AA, Sparky, GP, Magik and GR) and there are 30 champs I’m okay with getitng, but not excited about (Dorm, Juggs, MK, X23) and the other 65 I just don’t want (Col, SG, Khamala, Magneto).
I now have a 65% chance to pull a **** champ, not because the **** champs drop more often, but because I find more champs awful then there are champs I’d really want as a 5*.
I understand how RNG works, and they have said it many times. Not to mention the complexity of creating specific algorithms for every factor that is speculated. I understand how these things work. Besides that, do you really believe the servers we're on can instantaneously analyze our Accounts and produce an outcome? We have a hard time with Help Requests. Lol. No one is controlling our drops.
Mate, they wont have to show DRs per character (they wont have to show any at all even) just the fact that you will get a 5 star champ. Thats it. I think a lot of people on here are thinking like this, and thinking it will show per character, but it wont
Please see all the other, much better than me, posters mate, who explain that nothing will happen
But regarding this specific point: PHC, so they say 3% a 4*, 7% a 3* and 90% a 2*. How will that help you at all? You already know the odds are probably worse than that, plus you never buy PHCs anyway. So, again, how will that help?
Again, for the daily crystal, the same odds I would think. NOT per character, but per star level. How will that help
So, apart from those 2 minor examples, there are no other items we buy or pull where DRs will need to be show at all
5* featured pulls, what difference does it make?
who cares if they say its 20%?
my feature pulls
2/3 stark
2/2 blade
1/1 modok
and
anonymous2k
0-7 iceman
I have said this before mate, what is a "****" champ? What you class as one may not be classed the same by me or many others? We firstly need to decide what one is?
Please list your last 12 5* puls honestly so we can see if we agree? AND list all other 5* champs you have, to see if the great pulls in the past have just been accepted as random by you, but rubbish ones are a fix?
And, random is random surely?
1- you don't know any of this to be true yet once again are stating it all as fact. It's sad that this is a constant theme
2-computers don't do random. Stop just trying to adjust your previous bloviating to seem correct all the time. Semi-random is the silliest thing you've said in a while, especially after you spamming rng posts for so long. Random does not exist. Semi random means not random. Calling it semi random would be like me calling your posts semi truth.
3-nothing I said in my previous post was contingent on previous pulls or the overall account, as I don't think they matter. What does matter is the rarity/value of certain champs in both the eyes of the player and kabam themselves. They would be foolish to give you the same flat chances to pull an SL as a KK. It would hurt their bottom line in the short and long run. It's a business, why shoot themselves in the foot?
And to add... If all champs have the same chance of being pulled.. If there's no weighted system to disperse non-god tier champs more often.. Then it shouldn't be a big deal to disclose the algorithms or the drop rates in a way that makes that very clear for the average player. If it was really "1-44 equal chances" as another user says, then there's no reason to withhold anything at all. And I don't mean a mod saying it is "this way". Mods can be misinformed or mistaken from time to time. I mean putting an official statement up, as a company, in response to Apple.
If you believe everything Kabam says, or just assume they are doing the right thing when they don't say anything, that's great. They'd have nothing to lose by showing drop rates, since every champ has a 1/n chance of dropping.
The fact they are so anti-transparency lends itself to conspiracy theories. A situation Kabam has created. No one can state unequivocally that Kabam is honest and sincere or that they are deceptive shysters on the flip side.
The one thing we can do is get rates, compare to actual results and implement our own form of checks and balances.
Let's hope.
Why do you think they would hype Blade as the login reward, and do it well in advance of the normal login champ calendar? They know he is god tier, they know people desire him more than others.
This is not conspiracy, this is fact. So once again, wrong.
P.S. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.