You can't make a suggestion when you don't understand the parameters of the suggestion you are making. "my account is 2 million rating fighting 5 mill" I have a 5.2M rating.. 3 mill are from champs 1-5* maxed over the years..and will never be in my deck The only true advantage I have in the game is in events like women of power. Where I already had my 2* and 4* ranked and ready to complete objectives.
I mean, I can make a suggestion whenever I want...
Based on your comment, my 2 million account has 1.2 million rating of champs that I stupidly ranked in 2018-2020 before I took a break from playing, and they will never be in my deck...so...?
I just wanted to spark some conversation, which I did, and as I said, I'll play anyway because it's still fun.
Well your rating and your stupid champions is on you.... Rating is irrelevant, alliance total rating is also irrelevant.
I agree it's on me; just wanted to show that my rating is inflated too.
Sure, maybe total hero rating isn't the right way to do this. It was just an initial thought to brainstorm ideas, even if most of them don't work. "A journey of 1000 miles starts with a single step" and all that. The "aha" moment won't come without all the dumb ideas it's built on 😉
Competition is competition. Wanna climb ranks and be above every one else. Simply be better than them and beat them
Yep, that's why we have 8-year olds that are just learning to play basketball, freshmen in high school, and D1 college athletes all compete together...just be better! 🙄
If you want tiers relative to the account’s size, then it’s only fair to have tiers for the rewards too, with lower tiers having lower rewards…
Technically, they have that in the Store.
The store has items locked depending on where you stand in the game regarding story mode and specific conditions (x number of y* champions at z ranks). Nothing to do with account size.
The guy answering before me said he hit Valiant with a 2M account rating. What OP is suggesting would mean Valiant with 3M rating or less would get the same rewards as other valiants with higher ratings without facing the same difficulty.
How is that fair?
Hitting Valiant with a 2M Rating is not your average Player. That's someone with experience running an Alt. Those cases need to be discounted from the argument altogether because they don't represent natural progression. That's someone with previous knowledge doing a speed run. Story Mode and X amount of Y Champs at Z Ranks is literally a measurement of where your Account *should* be.
Nah not true. I'm about to hit valiant on my 2m rating MAIN account. Thronebreaker on my 400k alt acc
You just proved my point. These progress markers are for an average of Players at that point. At the time they're released, it might be a feat for some, but the markers themselves are a standard. Content-rushing is not a standard for average, and I suspect that Kabam isn't holding that as a standard for Players at that point either, at least in my educated guess. They're considering a Player that actually takes the time to develop their Accounts over time.
If you want tiers relative to the account’s size, then it’s only fair to have tiers for the rewards too, with lower tiers having lower rewards…
Technically, they have that in the Store.
The store has items locked depending on where you stand in the game regarding story mode and specific conditions (x number of y* champions at z ranks). Nothing to do with account size.
The guy answering before me said he hit Valiant with a 2M account rating. What OP is suggesting would mean Valiant with 3M rating or less would get the same rewards as other valiants with higher ratings without facing the same difficulty.
How is that fair?
Hitting Valiant with a 2M Rating is not your average Player. That's someone with experience running an Alt. Those cases need to be discounted from the argument altogether because they don't represent natural progression. That's someone with previous knowledge doing a speed run. Story Mode and X amount of Y Champs at Z Ranks is literally a measurement of where your Account *should* be.
Nah not true. I'm about to hit valiant on my 2m rating MAIN account. Thronebreaker on my 400k alt acc
If you want tiers relative to the account’s size, then it’s only fair to have tiers for the rewards too, with lower tiers having lower rewards…
Technically, they have that in the Store.
The store has items locked depending on where you stand in the game regarding story mode and specific conditions (x number of y* champions at z ranks). Nothing to do with account size.
The guy answering before me said he hit Valiant with a 2M account rating. What OP is suggesting would mean Valiant with 3M rating or less would get the same rewards as other valiants with higher ratings without facing the same difficulty.
How is that fair?
Hitting Valiant with a 2M Rating is not your average Player. That's someone with experience running an Alt. Those cases need to be discounted from the argument altogether because they don't represent natural progression. That's someone with previous knowledge doing a speed run. Story Mode and X amount of Y Champs at Z Ranks is literally a measurement of where your Account *should* be.
Nah not true. I'm about to hit valiant on my 2m rating MAIN account. Thronebreaker on my 400k alt acc
You just proved my point. These progress markers are for an average of Players at that point. At the time they're released, it might be a feat for some, but the markers themselves are a standard. Content-rushing is not a standard for average, and I suspect that Kabam isn't holding that as a standard for Players at that point either, at least in my educated guess. They're considering a Player that actually takes the time to develop their Accounts over time.
Not tryna speak for Dr. Disrespect, but in my case I haven't "rushed" content. I play at a normal pace, usually trying my best to do the content available to me with the resources I have. I've never bought units or anything to rush through content I have simply just been trying my best to reach the peak of what my roster can achieve at the moment, and as I develop my roster further the ceiling gets higher. I assume Dr. Disrespect would agree.
Comments
rating is inflated too.
Sure, maybe total hero rating isn't the right way to do this. It was just an initial thought to brainstorm ideas, even if most of them don't work. "A journey of 1000 miles starts with a single step" and all that. The "aha" moment won't come without all the dumb ideas it's built on 😉