Hey guys, this isn't a nerf to shocker, but a fix to how glancing works in general. Glancing has been incorrectly calculating the attack of the opponent since January and should be cutting the attack of the champion in half when hit. This meant that anyone who gains attack from somewhere on hit, was not having their attack cut in half correctly. Basically the easiest way to show this is glancing before was doing (1000/2) + 100000Now it does (1000 + 100000)/2Shocker is also fine for armor opponents because shocker wasn't changed, only glancing.
Hey guys, this isn't a nerf to shocker, but a fix to how glancing works in general. Glancing has been incorrectly calculating the attack of the opponent since January and should be cutting the attack of the champion in half when hit. This meant that anyone who gains attack from somewhere on hit, was not having their attack cut in half correctly. Basically the easiest way to show this is glancing before was doing (1000/2) + 100000Now it does (1000 + 100000)/2Shocker is also fine for armor opponents because shocker wasn't changed, only glancing. What about the interaction whit armor and armor rating?
Hey guys, this isn't a nerf to shocker, but a fix to how glancing works in general. Glancing has been incorrectly calculating the attack of the opponent since January and should be cutting the attack of the champion in half when hit. This meant that anyone who gains attack from somewhere on hit, was not having their attack cut in half correctly. Basically the easiest way to show this is glancing before was doing (1000/2) + 100000Now it does (1000 + 100000)/2Shocker is also fine for armor opponents because shocker wasn't changed, only glancing. Damage is also reduced with armor opponents. Posted screenshots upper.
Glancing - No GlancingArmor - No Armor10 charges all fights
So is this confirmed to be intentional? I have an r2 shocker and a big reason I took him up was to have another maestro counter. Idk if I’d rank him down at r2 but to those who have him r3 like the post above mine it’s incredibly unfair. I think RDTs would be deserved.
So is this confirmed to be intentional? I have an r2 shocker and a big reason I took him up was to have another maestro counter. Idk if I’d rank him down at r2 but to those who have him r3 like the post above mine it’s incredibly unfair. I think RDTs would be deserved. Yes, it is 100% intentional that she should have never worked for the Maestro.
So is this confirmed to be intentional? I have an r2 shocker and a big reason I took him up was to have another maestro counter. Idk if I’d rank him down at r2 but to those who have him r3 like the post above mine it’s incredibly unfair. I think RDTs would be deserved. Yes, it is 100% intentional that she should have never worked for the Maestro. Was this in the patchnotes/mentioned anywhere? It seems like everyone was unaware of this fix and I think they should’ve said this somewhere
So is this confirmed to be intentional? I have an r2 shocker and a big reason I took him up was to have another maestro counter. Idk if I’d rank him down at r2 but to those who have him r3 like the post above mine it’s incredibly unfair. I think RDTs would be deserved. Yes, it is 100% intentional that she should have never worked for the Maestro. That’s a big L. Even if it was unintentional why not just let it be. He was by no means game breaking it just added an extra layer of utility to his kit that you can’t find elsewhere. Also why wait so damn long to change it?
So is this confirmed to be intentional? I have an r2 shocker and a big reason I took him up was to have another maestro counter. Idk if I’d rank him down at r2 but to those who have him r3 like the post above mine it’s incredibly unfair. I think RDTs would be deserved. Yes, it is 100% intentional that she should have never worked for the Maestro. Was this in the patchnotes/mentioned anywhere? It seems like everyone was unaware of this fix and I think they should’ve said this somewhere It was a live fix that happened last Friday. Didn't need the client to be updated so not hot fix but will be on the patch notes of the may update.
So is this confirmed to be intentional? I have an r2 shocker and a big reason I took him up was to have another maestro counter. Idk if I’d rank him down at r2 but to those who have him r3 like the post above mine it’s incredibly unfair. I think RDTs would be deserved. Yes, it is 100% intentional that she should have never worked for the Maestro. Was this in the patchnotes/mentioned anywhere? It seems like everyone was unaware of this fix and I think they should’ve said this somewhere It was a live fix that happened last Friday. Didn't need the client to be updated so not hot fix but will be on the patch notes of the may update. So you’re saying this is official and there’s no issues? Pardon my naivety but are you representing kabam? Didn’t see it in your bio. Pardon if I missed it