Mercenaries and abuse content creators!

The content creators and mercenaries are profiting completely, without being part of the company and this is already an abuse that the community does not like and wants, they use their WhatsApp, create groups, use posts on social networks and harm the regular player, The game itself is affected by its prestige, we need a solid and real response, the abuse is already good, Kurt, Omega, Gonzalo... to name a few from LATAM that are wreaking havoc and there are many more...

Comments

GK_23

Has Golivarez returned?

drop_122

Please do not delete this notice, keep doing your job, kabam.

Ourobøros

What...

Trek26

Rasilover

You are just a yapper 😂

HotboiFieri

Are you saying content creators should not profit off their time and effort and it should be solely a hobby? More power to them if they can get donos, subs, views/ad rev.

I can piece together what your saying about mercs, but have no clue the correlation for content creators.

1199345

Content creators are VASTLY different from mercs...

CCs showcase game content, produce valuable guides for the community, provide historic records of deals/nerfs/buffs, etc...and if they turn a profit, it's solely based on views/ad revenue and donations.

Mercs get paid to play on someone else's account to get them ahead (aka cheat), which ultimately violates the ToS.

Joey_Joe_joe_27

This guy could write a 10 page paper about anything

unknown

This content has been removed.

shield311

captain_rogers

When I'm in a yapping competition and my opponent is Raperoxfree 😱😱😱

The_0wenpus

What...

...sApp

Ayden_noah1

The game itself is affected by its prestige, we need a solid and real response, the abuse is already good, Kurt, Omega, Gonzalo. Not sure what OP is trying to say here. The game is affected by prestige and the abuse is already good? I guess OP likes the abuse, to each their own I guess. Also the content creator and Mercs are profiting but aren't part of the company is weird. Uber eats don't work for the restaurants but make a profit selling a delivery service and commercials have actors that don't work for a company but profit from it. Foot Locker isn't owned by the shoe company but yet sells there shoes, so according to OP, it's not right. These are simple examples of people making money providing a good or service but don't work for the company and guess what they make money off it, weird right. Does OP only want the actual company to make profit. So the compnany makes the goods and service and also have to sell it themeslves only. What is the point of this post.