Why isn't Shathra a Serpent counter
Harryatomix
Member Posts: 379 ★★★
Shathra has all burst damage which serpent reduces by 60%. With Serpent not getting rebalanced I thought we were getting some Serepent counters and now they are wasting mystic releases like this. I am telling you the next mystic and the next one also won't counter Serpent. What a joke that kabam is playing with us.
8
Comments
I'm genuinely sick of this "not every champ" comment, that has literally been the case the whole year things need to change.
If it is dot then she could potentially be THE best Serpent counter, she won't be able to deal the death immunity or the pierce bs and all that but the power steal and atrophy will alleviate a lot of the bs Serpent has. More than Chavez or Kushala, we'll see I suppose, looks promising if it's dot but I don't want to make up my mind just yet cause that has led to disappointment most of this year.
You literally said every attacker this year EXCEPT for two are for bg. Meaning it goes with my point, not all are made for bg in mind.
Also just because a champ works for battleground doesn’t mean the team intended purpose for the champ was battleground.
Not every champ needs to be bg in mind and as for this year and every year since battlegrounds release has had a hand full of champs that are decent or great for bg. So there are no cases of a single year where all champs sucked for battleground.
The reason that argument makes no sense is because that has already been the case this year. When you say "not every champ has to be BGs focused" you're making it sound like most champs this year have been BGs focused which they haven't. The last strong attacker for BGs that truly became meta relevant was Kushala and that was 9 months ago, we haven't had a single strong attackers that became meta relevant this year not even White Tiger and Prowler, they're good sure but they're not that good.
Also, you say every year has had a handful of champs that are good in BGs yet out of the 16 new releases this year, only 2 are decent attackers and even then they're not even close to being meta relevant. How are you going to tell me that not all champs should be BGs focused when out of 16 only 2 are good? Especially compared to the 8 good ones we got in 2023 and the 9 good ones we got in 2022. We're 9 months into 2024 and we're not even close to half the amount of good attackers we received in 2022 and 2023, if you can't see how that's a bad thing I don't know what to tell you, get well soon I guess.