i never revive farmed a day don’t have time for it that’s just when i noticed everything started to go downhill the input issues could be delt with that was happening before but this is going above and beyond i play other games with much more going on better graphics more complex gameplay and have no issues when kabams response is always its either your wifi your phone or the version you have downloaded is all the proof i need
Kabam’s occasional admissions of wrong-doing, yet never addressing the situation, helps.
Admissions of wrong doing? You mean explaining that there's bugs in the game? Or do you mean you've seen somewhere where Kabam admitted to "wrong doing"?
Never addressing which situation? You're starting to sound like one of the orange con mans lawyers with these vague statements. It's not a good start for you.
This is purposeful, negligent, fraudulent, and a pattern that not only accelerates, but can be proven.
So prove it. Lay out your lawsuit here. On what grounds would you bring this suit? What evidence do you have? What pattern? Which case law would you use?
There is no case law. That’s the problem. Mobile gaming is a highly unregulated sector of the economy. And instead of being a caddy, little scamp, how about you get involved, too?
That being said, one would have to seek out Bumble’s case precedent or something, and the suit they lost for purposefully putting up fake profiles to generate membership sales.
In terms of evidence, there is no shortage of AI footage to demonstrate a long-standing pattern of negligence. Kabam’s occasional admissions of wrong-doing, yet never addressing the situation, helps. And I’m sure there are inside people that are or have been with the company that are aware of internal memos or metrics that illustrate their purposeful misconduct.
That being said, if anyone is serious, I’d happily be one of the class-representatives for a suit against Kabam.
“There is no case law” is a wild thing to say. There’s always case law. It may not be laser-focused on point, but I guarantee you it exists and any attorney worth their salt could probably find something relevant within a few hours of research.
But the word “relevant” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that paragraph. Because you still haven’t outlined an actual claim to determine what is relevant to it. What was Kabam’s duty? How did they breach it? Is that breach directly responsible for damages? Are those damages substantive or de minimis? You keep throwing the words “fraudulent” and “negligent” around but don’t seem to realize that those are entirely different claims requiring different bodies of proof not only of acts but intent, which, lol good luck proving intent. And like… “my progressional difficulty game keeps getting progressionally more difficult” ain’t exactly the slam dunk argument you seem to think it is.
And don’t even get me started on making this a class action case. Or I guess feel free to if you’re willing to pay my firm’s hourly rate.
“‘There is no case law’” is a wild thing to say. There’s always case law. It may not be laser-focused on point…”
Pettyfogger pontificating.
You get no hourly rate. You get a chunk of the awards at the end. That being said, you have no experience in class action matters, and your attempts to demonstrate otherwise are exceptionally cringe.
you would think an attorney would know that a lawyer gets paid from the winnings of a class action not an hourly rate i’m no lawyer and i know that much
i never revive farmed a day don’t have time for it that’s just when i noticed everything started to go downhill the input issues could be delt with that was happening before but this is going above and beyond i play other games with much more going on better graphics more complex gameplay and have no issues when kabams response is always its either your wifi your phone or the version you have downloaded is all the proof i need
That makes literally zero sense but if that's how you feel, then by all means, go play those games instead and don't let the door hit you on the way out.
This is purposeful, negligent, fraudulent, and a pattern that not only accelerates, but can be proven.
So prove it. Lay out your lawsuit here. On what grounds would you bring this suit? What evidence do you have? What pattern? Which case law would you use?
There is no case law. That’s the problem. Mobile gaming is a highly unregulated sector of the economy. And instead of being a caddy, little scamp, how about you get involved, too?
That being said, one would have to seek out Bumble’s case precedent or something, and the suit they lost for purposefully putting up fake profiles to generate membership sales.
In terms of evidence, there is no shortage of AI footage to demonstrate a long-standing pattern of negligence. Kabam’s occasional admissions of wrong-doing, yet never addressing the situation, helps. And I’m sure there are inside people that are or have been with the company that are aware of internal memos or metrics that illustrate their purposeful misconduct.
That being said, if anyone is serious, I’d happily be one of the class-representatives for a suit against Kabam.
“There is no case law” is a wild thing to say. There’s always case law. It may not be laser-focused on point, but I guarantee you it exists and any attorney worth their salt could probably find something relevant within a few hours of research.
But the word “relevant” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that paragraph. Because you still haven’t outlined an actual claim to determine what is relevant to it. What was Kabam’s duty? How did they breach it? Is that breach directly responsible for damages? Are those damages substantive or de minimis? You keep throwing the words “fraudulent” and “negligent” around but don’t seem to realize that those are entirely different claims requiring different bodies of proof not only of acts but intent, which, lol good luck proving intent. And like… “my progressional difficulty game keeps getting progressionally more difficult” ain’t exactly the slam dunk argument you seem to think it is.
And don’t even get me started on making this a class action case. Or I guess feel free to if you’re willing to pay my firm’s hourly rate.
I'd just like to be there when Netmarbles legal team walks in and presents the ToS and case gets dismissed in 30 seconds.
This is purposeful, negligent, fraudulent, and a pattern that not only accelerates, but can be proven.
So prove it. Lay out your lawsuit here. On what grounds would you bring this suit? What evidence do you have? What pattern? Which case law would you use?
There is no case law. That’s the problem. Mobile gaming is a highly unregulated sector of the economy. And instead of being a caddy, little scamp, how about you get involved, too?
That being said, one would have to seek out Bumble’s case precedent or something, and the suit they lost for purposefully putting up fake profiles to generate membership sales.
In terms of evidence, there is no shortage of AI footage to demonstrate a long-standing pattern of negligence. Kabam’s occasional admissions of wrong-doing, yet never addressing the situation, helps. And I’m sure there are inside people that are or have been with the company that are aware of internal memos or metrics that illustrate their purposeful misconduct.
That being said, if anyone is serious, I’d happily be one of the class-representatives for a suit against Kabam.
“There is no case law” is a wild thing to say. There’s always case law. It may not be laser-focused on point, but I guarantee you it exists and any attorney worth their salt could probably find something relevant within a few hours of research.
But the word “relevant” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that paragraph. Because you still haven’t outlined an actual claim to determine what is relevant to it. What was Kabam’s duty? How did they breach it? Is that breach directly responsible for damages? Are those damages substantive or de minimis? You keep throwing the words “fraudulent” and “negligent” around but don’t seem to realize that those are entirely different claims requiring different bodies of proof not only of acts but intent, which, lol good luck proving intent. And like… “my progressional difficulty game keeps getting progressionally more difficult” ain’t exactly the slam dunk argument you seem to think it is.
And don’t even get me started on making this a class action case. Or I guess feel free to if you’re willing to pay my firm’s hourly rate.
“‘There is no case law’” is a wild thing to say. There’s always case law. It may not be laser-focused on point…”
Pettyfogger pontificating.
You get no hourly rate. You get a chunk of the awards at the end. That being said, you have no experience in class action matters, and your attempts to demonstrate otherwise are exceptionally cringe.
you would think an attorney would know that a lawyer gets paid from the winnings of a class action not an hourly rate i’m no lawyer and i know that much
Then you obviously don't know a whole lot. There are plenty of lawyers who do both. And it depends on the type of case. If it's a civil suit that takes a day tops, then it's hourly. If it's a major case taking weeks or longer, it's end of trial type thing. Please, learn your facts before talking nonsense.
The Stockholm Syndrome is heartbreaking, honestly.
“Prove that the game is purposefully broken when the game always breaks to the advantage of Kabam whenever there is an update.”
Ummm…
Lol. My guy, the existence of bugs and code not working correctly is not evidence of purposefully making the game not work. Were you on OJ Simpons legal team? If the glove don't fit, acquit, am i right?
so you have proof they aren’t because it’s a two way road way too inconvenient the modes where dying actually matters is bugged the day they took away revive farming and made the game pay to win is the day it all started play any other mode besides war battle grounds or incursions and the game does not lag it does not freeze there are control input issues only in modes where a score is kept are there only bugs but when the bug benefits us and takes money away from them it’s fixed immediately and properly fixed when it benefits them then they make a claim that it takes all this time then they finally say it’s fixed and of course it is not idc what anyone says something shady is going on and it will come out
You're missing a few of these- ...,,,.....,,,,,????
Arguing on behalf of institutions, and poorly I might add, just isn’t a good look.
Watching you crumble in real time is fun to watch. Instead of actually proving your claims, you leave comments like this.
Stockholm Syndrome, and ups the anti by recycling and repackaging my joke!
I’ve provided far more than enough. If you don’t like it, if you don’t believe it, go buy some units and continue your day.
This thread is about Kabam’s scandalous behavior. If you feel otherwise, make a thread about Kabam’s upstanding corporate citizenry. You and the other sycophants can chill over there.
Arguing on behalf of institutions, and poorly I might add, just isn’t a good look.
Watching you crumble in real time is fun to watch. Instead of actually proving your claims, you leave comments like this.
Stockholm Syndrome, and ups the anti by recycling and repackaging my joke!
I’ve provided far more than enough. If you don’t like it, if you don’t believe it, go buy some units and continue your day.
This thread is about Kabam’s scandalous behavior. If you feel otherwise, make a thread about Kabam’s upstanding corporate citizenry. You and the other sycophants can chill over there.
You've proved you don't do any research.
We all know no one on forums does their research and just spouts nonsense most of the time.
Arguing on behalf of institutions, and poorly I might add, just isn’t a good look.
Watching you crumble in real time is fun to watch. Instead of actually proving your claims, you leave comments like this.
Stockholm Syndrome, and ups the anti by recycling and repackaging my joke!
I’ve provided far more than enough. If you don’t like it, if you don’t believe it, go buy some units and continue your day.
This thread is about Kabam’s scandalous behavior. If you feel otherwise, make a thread about Kabam’s upstanding corporate citizenry. You and the other sycophants can chill over there.
You've proved you don't do any research.
We all know no one on forums does their research and just spouts nonsense most of the time.
we clearly aren’t homies you are ok with kabam stealing from people
Arguing on behalf of institutions, and poorly I might add, just isn’t a good look.
Watching you crumble in real time is fun to watch. Instead of actually proving your claims, you leave comments like this.
Stockholm Syndrome, and ups the anti by recycling and repackaging my joke!
I’ve provided far more than enough. If you don’t like it, if you don’t believe it, go buy some units and continue your day.
This thread is about Kabam’s scandalous behavior. If you feel otherwise, make a thread about Kabam’s upstanding corporate citizenry. You and the other sycophants can chill over there.
You've proved you don't do any research.
We all know no one on forums does their research and just spouts nonsense most of the time.
we clearly aren’t homies you are ok with kabam stealing from people
You lacking any sort of skill to play this game is not Kabam stealing from you.
Arguing on behalf of institutions, and poorly I might add, just isn’t a good look.
Institutions?? My dude, Kabam isn’t Google or the government. They aren’t some sprawling megacorp that has institutional power demonstrated via lobbying. They’re a mobile video game company owned by a bigger mobile video game company. Come on.
This is purposeful, negligent, fraudulent, and a pattern that not only accelerates, but can be proven.
So prove it. Lay out your lawsuit here. On what grounds would you bring this suit? What evidence do you have? What pattern? Which case law would you use?
There is no case law. That’s the problem. Mobile gaming is a highly unregulated sector of the economy. And instead of being a caddy, little scamp, how about you get involved, too?
That being said, one would have to seek out Bumble’s case precedent or something, and the suit they lost for purposefully putting up fake profiles to generate membership sales.
In terms of evidence, there is no shortage of AI footage to demonstrate a long-standing pattern of negligence. Kabam’s occasional admissions of wrong-doing, yet never addressing the situation, helps. And I’m sure there are inside people that are or have been with the company that are aware of internal memos or metrics that illustrate their purposeful misconduct.
That being said, if anyone is serious, I’d happily be one of the class-representatives for a suit against Kabam.
“There is no case law” is a wild thing to say. There’s always case law. It may not be laser-focused on point, but I guarantee you it exists and any attorney worth their salt could probably find something relevant within a few hours of research.
But the word “relevant” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that paragraph. Because you still haven’t outlined an actual claim to determine what is relevant to it. What was Kabam’s duty? How did they breach it? Is that breach directly responsible for damages? Are those damages substantive or de minimis? You keep throwing the words “fraudulent” and “negligent” around but don’t seem to realize that those are entirely different claims requiring different bodies of proof not only of acts but intent, which, lol good luck proving intent. And like… “my progressional difficulty game keeps getting progressionally more difficult” ain’t exactly the slam dunk argument you seem to think it is.
And don’t even get me started on making this a class action case. Or I guess feel free to if you’re willing to pay my firm’s hourly rate.
“‘There is no case law’” is a wild thing to say. There’s always case law. It may not be laser-focused on point…”
Pettyfogger pontificating.
You get no hourly rate. You get a chunk of the awards at the end. That being said, you have no experience in class action matters, and your attempts to demonstrate otherwise are exceptionally cringe.
The hourly rate comment was describing what I would charge to explain how a class action would never get off the ground.
As a general rule, attorneys take contingency fees (the “chunk of rewards,” as you so clumsily put it) on cases they are confident they can win, or at least settle for a meaningful amount. What you are describing is extremely not one of those cases. You aren’t getting a class action suit here, and no attorney is taking this on a contingency fee.
Arguing on behalf of institutions, and poorly I might add, just isn’t a good look.
Watching you crumble in real time is fun to watch. Instead of actually proving your claims, you leave comments like this.
Stockholm Syndrome, and ups the anti by recycling and repackaging my joke!
I’ve provided far more than enough. If you don’t like it, if you don’t believe it, go buy some units and continue your day.
This thread is about Kabam’s scandalous behavior. If you feel otherwise, make a thread about Kabam’s upstanding corporate citizenry. You and the other sycophants can chill over there.
You've proved you don't do any research.
We all know no one on forums does their research and just spouts nonsense most of the time.
we clearly aren’t homies you are ok with kabam stealing from people
So what are they stealing? As seems like a nonsense post to me
Arguing on behalf of institutions, and poorly I might add, just isn’t a good look.
Watching you crumble in real time is fun to watch. Instead of actually proving your claims, you leave comments like this.
Stockholm Syndrome, and ups the anti by recycling and repackaging my joke!
I’ve provided far more than enough. If you don’t like it, if you don’t believe it, go buy some units and continue your day.
This thread is about Kabam’s scandalous behavior. If you feel otherwise, make a thread about Kabam’s upstanding corporate citizenry. You and the other sycophants can chill over there.
You've proved you don't do any research.
We all know no one on forums does their research and just spouts nonsense most of the time.
we clearly aren’t homies you are ok with kabam stealing from people
I'm sorry, but what? What exactly are they stealing? If you say it's time and money, that's 100% on you. Not kabam. You CHOOSE to play or pay for things knowing the game has bugs. Unless your addicted to the game and simply can't stop. Which again, is 100% you, and not kabam. Grow up.
Arguing on behalf of institutions, and poorly I might add, just isn’t a good look.
Watching you crumble in real time is fun to watch. Instead of actually proving your claims, you leave comments like this.
Stockholm Syndrome, and ups the anti by recycling and repackaging my joke!
I’ve provided far more than enough. If you don’t like it, if you don’t believe it, go buy some units and continue your day.
This thread is about Kabam’s scandalous behavior. If you feel otherwise, make a thread about Kabam’s upstanding corporate citizenry. You and the other sycophants can chill over there.
You've proved you don't do any research.
We all know no one on forums does their research and just spouts nonsense most of the time.
we clearly aren’t homies you are ok with kabam stealing from people
So what are they stealing? As seems like a nonsense post to me
“They’re stealing from me by making me willingly spend my money and giving me the thing I paid for in return!”
Arguing on behalf of institutions, and poorly I might add, just isn’t a good look.
Watching you crumble in real time is fun to watch. Instead of actually proving your claims, you leave comments like this.
Stockholm Syndrome, and ups the anti by recycling and repackaging my joke!
I’ve provided far more than enough. If you don’t like it, if you don’t believe it, go buy some units and continue your day.
This thread is about Kabam’s scandalous behavior. If you feel otherwise, make a thread about Kabam’s upstanding corporate citizenry. You and the other sycophants can chill over there.
You've proved you don't do any research.
We all know no one on forums does their research and just spouts nonsense most of the time.
Speaking of case law, a TOS does not preclude them from responsibility. Feel free to look into Uber’s current Rideshare litigation pertaining to drivers classified as independent contractors. Administrative hearings work quite similar to class-action lawsuits. The class is individualized on a case-by-case basis, with all yielding the same conclusion and granted the same damages.
Poor Demon. Control F’d in hopes to create a gotcha moment, but only undermined his own credibility.
I'd like to know in what universe Uber and kabam share in common regarding literally anything. I'll wait.
Arguing on behalf of institutions, and poorly I might add, just isn’t a good look.
Watching you crumble in real time is fun to watch. Instead of actually proving your claims, you leave comments like this.
Stockholm Syndrome, and ups the anti by recycling and repackaging my joke!
I’ve provided far more than enough. If you don’t like it, if you don’t believe it, go buy some units and continue your day.
This thread is about Kabam’s scandalous behavior. If you feel otherwise, make a thread about Kabam’s upstanding corporate citizenry. You and the other sycophants can chill over there.
You've proved you don't do any research.
We all know no one on forums does their research and just spouts nonsense most of the time.
we clearly aren’t homies you are ok with kabam stealing from people
So what are they stealing? As seems like a nonsense post to me
“They’re stealing from me by making me willingly spend my money and giving me the thing I paid for in return!”
Haha even though they agree to the tos of buying products
Kabam have always focused on making money and I don't think they try to hide it tbh.
Do all martians lack braincells? The company doesn't run with the power of friendship and love they need money to run.
We had to spare some of our brain cells for people like you so you could actually function and do more than one thing at a time, you're welcome!
We obviously didn't give you enough though since you seem still lack the ability to read beyond a 1st grade level. If and when you're able to read after some practise you will see that I said "Kabam have always focused on making money and I don't think they try to hide it tbh."
When you're able to read that sentence and comprehend it then and only then should you try and reply.
it’s spelled PRACTICE if you gonna talk **** about someone’s intelligence at least spell words right
Y'all keep your mouth shut when government does scandal on your money while they're supposed to provide you with quality life, but scream when private organizations who work for profit actually makes profit instead of doing charity.
Comments
Never addressing which situation? You're starting to sound like one of the orange con mans lawyers with these vague statements. It's not a good start for you.
You've proved you don't do any research.
We was in peace for so many months...
As a general rule, attorneys take contingency fees (the “chunk of rewards,” as you so clumsily put it) on cases they are confident they can win, or at least settle for a meaningful amount. What you are describing is extremely not one of those cases. You aren’t getting a class action suit here, and no attorney is taking this on a contingency fee.