22 in P1 is this active season where 1 war defeat isn’t going to count
Masters was last season finish when you 100% guaranteed LOXC and 4LOKI are not master alliances. Your 100% facts are completely wrong
You are not wrong the season is messed up but to argue how matchmaking works with people from alliances that play T1 each season is just ridiculous
And if you think we have had it easy this season because of the mess up you’d also be wrong again. We have matched NewN, Pycb, ZEEN, INDA, CHAOS, SSX, CIRR, MEAT, Jugg2, VN_77 this is whilst many above us have been matching low P1/P2 alliances
22 in P1 is this active season where 1 war defeat isn’t going to count
Masters was last season finish when you 100% guaranteed LOXC and 4LOKI are not master alliances. Your 100% facts are completely wrong
You are not wrong the season is messed up but to argue how matchmaking works with people from alliances that play T1 each season is just ridiculous
And if you think we have had it easy this season because of the mess up you’d also be wrong again. We have matched NewN, Pycb, ZEEN, INDA, CHAOS, SSX, CIRR, MEAT, Jugg2, VN_77 this is whilst many above us have been matching low P1/P2 alliances
Ahh yes another one. Please enlighten me as to where I can find the absolute concrete proof (not speculation) on how kabam match making works.
Instead of being obnoxious you could maybe accept when you are wrong
You will be waiting a long time for your concrete evidence because only Kabam know how war matchmaking is coded. Confirming this to you is probably not high up on the Kabam to do list
If war rating is the main criteria for matchmaking how do you explain this 331 difference?
Matchmaking is 100% screwed up and I hope it is looked into but almost all of your arguments have been wrong
Instead of being obnoxious you could maybe accept when you are wrong
You will be waiting a long time for your concrete evidence because only Kabam know how war matchmaking is coded. Confirming this to you is probably not high up on the Kabam to do list
If war rating is the main criteria for matchmaking how do you explain this 331 difference?
Matchmaking is 100% screwed up and I hope it is looked into but almost all of your arguments have been wrong
He knows how it works he just wants this thread going on. War rating counts until a certain point but 4th war affected matchmaking so much that the matchmaker cant reach alliances that dropped too far so leaderboard counts. This is how it worked for years. Also war rating doesn't matter as much as win loss rate. But if you don't play a war this counts as 5 losses although it is only one loss.
Instead of being obnoxious you could maybe accept when you are wrong
You will be waiting a long time for your concrete evidence because only Kabam know how war matchmaking is coded. Confirming this to you is probably not high up on the Kabam to do list
If war rating is the main criteria for matchmaking how do you explain this 331 difference?
Matchmaking is 100% screwed up and I hope it is looked into but almost all of your arguments have been wrong
But you were just upset over me calling your alliance p1, which I'm sorry(not sorry, you chose to join in here) but you're a p1 alliance. Are you close to masters? Yeah. Are you masters. No.
The kicker is you provided a misleading screenshot which I am still laughing to myself at. Like why show a mid season screenshot of being in masters when you know you are in p1 rn? Like I wouldn't look? 🙄😂
So you changed the subject immediately. You're 0/2. Shouldn't have commented.
Instead of being obnoxious you could maybe accept when you are wrong
You will be waiting a long time for your concrete evidence because only Kabam know how war matchmaking is coded. Confirming this to you is probably not high up on the Kabam to do list
If war rating is the main criteria for matchmaking how do you explain this 331 difference?
Matchmaking is 100% screwed up and I hope it is looked into but almost all of your arguments have been wrong
He knows how it works he just wants this thread going on. War rating counts until a certain point but 4th war affected matchmaking so much that the matchmaker cant reach alliances that dropped too far so leaderboard counts. This is how it worked for years. Also war rating doesn't matter as much as win loss rate. But if you don't play a war this counts as 5 losses although it is only one loss.
Instead of being obnoxious you could maybe accept when you are wrong
You will be waiting a long time for your concrete evidence because only Kabam know how war matchmaking is coded. Confirming this to you is probably not high up on the Kabam to do list
If war rating is the main criteria for matchmaking how do you explain this 331 difference?
Matchmaking is 100% screwed up and I hope it is looked into but almost all of your arguments have been wrong
He knows how it works he just wants this thread going on. War rating counts until a certain point but 4th war affected matchmaking so much that the matchmaker cant reach alliances that dropped too far so leaderboard counts. This is how it worked for years. Also war rating doesn't matter as much as win loss rate. But if you don't play a war this counts as 5 losses although it is only one loss.
Sometimes people just like to argue to blow off steam.
This thread is slowly getting derailed and starting to go nowhere.
Yeah, the comments havnt reflected the actual topic for a while. It's hard to get an actual discussion going around my post. Most people just agree with it.
So I took the no publicity is bad publicity route here just to keep it mainpage.
This thread is slowly getting derailed and starting to go nowhere.
“Starting to..”?
There's just no conversation surrounding the post. It's hard to have one, I pretty much outlined everything and provided a solution. Believe me, I'd have been more than happy to discuss the topic rather than do what I had to do to keep it mainpage.
Well, there are probably less than a thousand people who really care about this issue so pumping it up artificially is your only choice. Maybe you’d have better luck trying to back-channel something via a CCp member.
Well, there are probably less than a thousand people who really care about this issue so pumping it up artificially is your only choice. Maybe you’d have better luck trying to back-channel something via a CCp member.
True, this issue only really affects a small amount of alliances. The ones on the cusp of tiers multipliers.
The outcome will affect all alliances though, 1 tier up rewards is good for everyone. So regardless if this pertains to your alliance, it's still beneficial to hope the post influences kabams choice on the matter.
This isn't the only thing I did to go about trying to get kabams attention, we made tickets, we messaged ccp, brought it up in line groups. The more people bringing the topic up to kabam or the general community, the more likely kabam can address and fix the problem.
That being said, this is like half artificially bumped. If I really wanted to artificially bump it I would have just posted the dots like I occasionally do. If this post is seen by kabam, they're probably not going to read through all the comments. They're going to see that there's been alot of attention on the post.
I hope you understand this explanation, I am not the best at fully explaining things.
This thread is slowly getting derailed and starting to go nowhere.
“Starting to..”?
There's just no conversation surrounding the post. It's hard to have one, I pretty much outlined everything and provided a solution. Believe me, I'd have been more than happy to discuss the topic rather than do what I had to do to keep it mainpage.
You outlined your ignorance and yes we get it... You don't understand the subject. I wonder why you are so focused on defending your opinion (which is far from being correct).
Well, there are probably less than a thousand people who really care about this issue so pumping it up artificially is your only choice. Maybe you’d have better luck trying to back-channel something via a CCp member.
True, this issue only really affects a small amount of alliances. The ones on the cusp of tiers multipliers.
The outcome will affect all alliances though, 1 tier up rewards is good for everyone. So regardless if this pertains to your alliance, it's still beneficial to hope the post influences kabams choice on the matter.
If you can explain how any of this matters to, say, either of these alliances:
Or how it would be "fair" to move the rest of the 1500 alliances currently sitting in Silver 1 up to Gold 6 because of 1 war, then I'm all ears.
This thread is slowly getting derailed and starting to go nowhere.
“Starting to..”?
There's just no conversation surrounding the post. It's hard to have one, I pretty much outlined everything and provided a solution. Believe me, I'd have been more than happy to discuss the topic rather than do what I had to do to keep it mainpage.
You outlined your ignorance and yes we get it... You don't understand the subject. I wonder why you are so focused on defending your opinion (which is far from being correct).
Lol yeah just like your last rant, I'm not reading anything beyond the first line. So we are clear, people like you(I saw a comment of yours on another thread) are only on here to argue with people because you have a miserable life.
FYI you took the exact stance on the subject i did, on another post.
So for your sake. Don't waste your time typing here. No one cares what you have to say. You're a joke.
Well, there are probably less than a thousand people who really care about this issue so pumping it up artificially is your only choice. Maybe you’d have better luck trying to back-channel something via a CCp member.
True, this issue only really affects a small amount of alliances. The ones on the cusp of tiers multipliers.
The outcome will affect all alliances though, 1 tier up rewards is good for everyone. So regardless if this pertains to your alliance, it's still beneficial to hope the post influences kabams choice on the matter.
If you can explain how any of this matters to, say, either of these alliances:
Or how it would be "fair" to move the rest of the 1500 alliances currently sitting in Silver 1 up to Gold 6 because of 1 war, then I'm all ears.
I honestly am not sure what you want me to explain here. It's not clear what your problem is.
Those war ratings are updated post war so um 2293-36, 2228+31 would mean this war started with 2262 vs 2259 which..yeah.. idk what else to say. If that's your issue.
If your issue is everyone getting more rewards then idk? Everyone gets more rewards? So everyone wins? Seems pretty simple to me. Can't really give rewards to selected alliances and not expect other people to complain who didn't. And this was the solution they chose to implement last time a war was canceled, just to be clear.
Well, there are probably less than a thousand people who really care about this issue so pumping it up artificially is your only choice. Maybe you’d have better luck trying to back-channel something via a CCp member.
True, this issue only really affects a small amount of alliances. The ones on the cusp of tiers multipliers.
The outcome will affect all alliances though, 1 tier up rewards is good for everyone. So regardless if this pertains to your alliance, it's still beneficial to hope the post influences kabams choice on the matter.
If you can explain how any of this matters to, say, either of these alliances:
Or how it would be "fair" to move the rest of the 1500 alliances currently sitting in Silver 1 up to Gold 6 because of 1 war, then I'm all ears.
I honestly am not sure what you want me to explain here. It's not clear what your problem is.
Those war ratings are updated post war so um 2293-36, 2228+31 would mean this war started with 2262 vs 2259 which..yeah.. idk what else to say. If that's your issue.
If your issue is everyone getting more rewards then idk? Everyone gets more rewards? So everyone wins? Seems pretty simple to me. Can't really give rewards to selected alliances and not expect other people to complain who didn't. And this was the solution they chose to implement last time a war was canceled, just to be clear.
Can't speak for the other alliance who had one player attack 3 tiles over 2 days, but since the last time our alliance participated in a war season was a calendar year ago (about the same time they rewarded alliance war participation), we clearly don't care a lick about multipliers or war ratings, so speak for yourself on such matters. Don't say this affects everyone, cause it clearly just really bothers you for some reason.
If you're cool with Everyone gets rewards they didn't earn, cause you said so, then great! I'll take the same rewards as you, should be equal, we're all in this together, right?
Well, there are probably less than a thousand people who really care about this issue so pumping it up artificially is your only choice. Maybe you’d have better luck trying to back-channel something via a CCp member.
True, this issue only really affects a small amount of alliances. The ones on the cusp of tiers multipliers.
The outcome will affect all alliances though, 1 tier up rewards is good for everyone. So regardless if this pertains to your alliance, it's still beneficial to hope the post influences kabams choice on the matter.
If you can explain how any of this matters to, say, either of these alliances:
Or how it would be "fair" to move the rest of the 1500 alliances currently sitting in Silver 1 up to Gold 6 because of 1 war, then I'm all ears.
I honestly am not sure what you want me to explain here. It's not clear what your problem is.
Those war ratings are updated post war so um 2293-36, 2228+31 would mean this war started with 2262 vs 2259 which..yeah.. idk what else to say. If that's your issue.
If your issue is everyone getting more rewards then idk? Everyone gets more rewards? So everyone wins? Seems pretty simple to me. Can't really give rewards to selected alliances and not expect other people to complain who didn't. And this was the solution they chose to implement last time a war was canceled, just to be clear.
Can't speak for the other alliance who had one player attack 3 tiles over 2 days, but since the last time our alliance participated in a war season was a calendar year ago (about the same time they rewarded alliance war participation), we clearly don't care a lick about multipliers or war ratings, so speak for yourself on such matters. Don't say this affects everyone, cause it clearly just really bothers you for some reason.
If you're cool with Everyone gets rewards they didn't earn, cause you said so, then great! I'll take the same rewards as you, should be equal, we're all in this together, right?
Make it happen Mr. Stark! Top rewards for all!
You're responses are very confusing. I suggest you read more than one cherry picked comment or maybe the actual post?
I've stated more than a few times this problem affects a small amount of alliances, it even said it in the one comment you read. I genuily am confused by your responses as a whole.
You clearly don't understand this topic even remotely. Or the solution suggest. (Which for the 2nd time is the solution kabam implemented last time 😂)
I don't care anymore we won the season again @Iammeat5 now there are alliances on podium that abused the 4th war. One of them matched their 11th P1 alliance in a row which is crazy but yeah whatever😂👍 Hopefully the compensation will give me double rank one rewards XD
Comments
Evidently you know very little. You really need to check your facts
Lmfao brother. Loxc is rank 21 p1. yOu nEeD tO cHEcK yOuR fAcTs 💀
22*** my fault
Masters was last season finish when you 100% guaranteed LOXC and 4LOKI are not master alliances. Your 100% facts are completely wrong
You are not wrong the season is messed up but to argue how matchmaking works with people from alliances that play T1 each season is just ridiculous
And if you think we have had it easy this season because of the mess up you’d also be wrong again. We have matched NewN, Pycb, ZEEN, INDA, CHAOS, SSX, CIRR, MEAT, Jugg2, VN_77 this is whilst many above us have been matching low P1/P2 alliances
I'll.
Wait. 😂
You will be waiting a long time for your concrete evidence because only Kabam know how war matchmaking is coded. Confirming this to you is probably not high up on the Kabam to do list
If war rating is the main criteria for matchmaking how do you explain this 331 difference?
Matchmaking is 100% screwed up and I hope it is looked into but almost all of your arguments have been wrong
The kicker is you provided a misleading screenshot which I am still laughing to myself at. Like why show a mid season screenshot of being in masters when you know you are in p1 rn? Like I wouldn't look? 🙄😂
So you changed the subject immediately. You're 0/2. Shouldn't have commented.
So I took the no publicity is bad publicity route here just to keep it mainpage.
The outcome will affect all alliances though, 1 tier up rewards is good for everyone. So regardless if this pertains to your alliance, it's still beneficial to hope the post influences kabams choice on the matter.
This isn't the only thing I did to go about trying to get kabams attention, we made tickets, we messaged ccp, brought it up in line groups. The more people bringing the topic up to kabam or the general community, the more likely kabam can address and fix the problem.
That being said, this is like half artificially bumped. If I really wanted to artificially bump it I would have just posted the dots like I occasionally do. If this post is seen by kabam, they're probably not going to read through all the comments. They're going to see that there's been alot of attention on the post.
I hope you understand this explanation, I am not the best at fully explaining things.
Or how it would be "fair" to move the rest of the 1500 alliances currently sitting in Silver 1 up to Gold 6 because of 1 war, then I'm all ears.
last war of a creepy season
FYI you took the exact stance on the subject i did, on another post.
So for your sake. Don't waste your time typing here. No one cares what you have to say. You're a joke.
Those war ratings are updated post war so um 2293-36, 2228+31 would mean this war started with 2262 vs 2259 which..yeah.. idk what else to say. If that's your issue.
If your issue is everyone getting more rewards then idk? Everyone gets more rewards? So everyone wins? Seems pretty simple to me. Can't really give rewards to selected alliances and not expect other people to complain who didn't. And this was the solution they chose to implement last time a war was canceled, just to be clear.
so speak for yourself on such matters. Don't say this affects everyone, cause it clearly just really bothers you for some reason.
If you're cool with Everyone gets rewards they didn't earn, cause you said so, then great! I'll take the same rewards as you, should be equal, we're all in this together, right?
Make it happen Mr. Stark! Top rewards for all!
I've stated more than a few times this problem affects a small amount of alliances, it even said it in the one comment you read. I genuily am confused by your responses as a whole.
You clearly don't understand this topic even remotely. Or the solution suggest. (Which for the 2nd time is the solution kabam implemented last time 😂)
Hopefully the compensation will give me double rank one rewards XD