Silver sable buff

BendyBendy Member Posts: 7,864 ★★★★★
edited January 6 in General Discussion
This buff i love her damage from sp2 is insane against shock immunes quite some nice damage especially if science as goes from 5k to 6k


1 sable mine on ws only then 1 sp2 A


Abyss thing was fun with sp3s

«1

Comments

  • PT_99PT_99 Member Posts: 5,081 ★★★★★
    edited January 6
    Sure sure 🤣
    Silver Sable is surely good now
  • baskinrobbinsknowsbaskinrobbinsknows Member Posts: 279 ★★★
    edited January 6
    I don't see the buff on the description nor for Northstar and I keep checking the iOS store for an update. What am I doing wrong?

    Edit; Nevermind it just showed up on the iOS to update.
  • captain_rogerscaptain_rogers Member Posts: 10,643 ★★★★★
    Silver enable?
  • BendyBendy Member Posts: 7,864 ★★★★★
    Csutton said:

    TheLegend27 said:

    IMO, they missed the mark. Nice change to damage, but I still don't think I'll be ranking and playing with my 7* sable. It would be a different story If they gave an infuriate or made the enemy AI more aggressive the more shocks they had.

    Agreed. She is better but still not up to par with champs I wanna rank up. 7* skill class could use a really solid champ. Sable and patriot have both been misses
    I think ur judging her wrong shes defo worth ranking as she can do short fights as well 1 sable mine crit shocks is enough as ive shown vs ws
  • BigBlueOxBigBlueOx Member Posts: 2,607 ★★★★★
    It’s a definite improvement but I think she still ends up being too rigid when compared to other damage dealers as her damage will be reliant on controlling the map, which isn’t hard it’s just a condition her counterparts don’t have and her damage per a second when pulling this off is not markedly better than those champs.
  • WednesdayLengthWednesdayLength Member Posts: 1,922 ★★★★
    TheLegend27 said:

    IMO, they missed the mark. Nice change to damage, but I still don't think I'll be ranking and playing with my 7* sable. It would be a different story If they gave an infuriate or made the enemy AI more aggressive the more shocks they had.

    I don't see how they missed the mark? They made her damage loop actually work and made her a lot of fun to play. They've already said that they don't want to give every character that needs to intercept an Infuriate because the goal would be to just fix the ai
  • IronwarriorIronwarrior Member Posts: 15 ★
    Bendy said:

    Wolf911 said:

    The damage is a lot better than I thought it would be

    My 7* rank 1 sig 20 was doing 13k per tick with passive shocks

    will have to test some more but she is quite usable now

    My testing i took 1.5m red hulk in 100 hits
    PLEASE tell your rotation, I might just be a bad player but i can't maintain those shocks or mines on time
  • BendyBendy Member Posts: 7,864 ★★★★★
    Ironwarrior said:

    Bendy said:

    Wolf911 said:

    The damage is a lot better than I thought it would be

    My 7* rank 1 sig 20 was doing 13k per tick with passive shocks

    will have to test some more but she is quite usable now

    My testing i took 1.5m red hulk in 100 hits
    PLEASE tell your rotation, I might just be a bad player but i can't maintain those shocks or mines on time
    Intercepts to refresh mines straight away and i had a 26k passive shock from sp2 into the activated mine
  • DONZALOOG1234DONZALOOG1234 Member Posts: 321 ★★
    Bendy said:

    Wolf911 said:

    The damage is a lot better than I thought it would be

    My 7* rank 1 sig 20 was doing 13k per tick with passive shocks

    will have to test some more but she is quite usable now

    My testing i took 1.5m red hulk in 100 hits
    why are people disagreeing, did they watch you do the fight?
  • BigBlueOxBigBlueOx Member Posts: 2,607 ★★★★★
    WednesdayLength said:

    TheLegend27 said:

    IMO, they missed the mark. Nice change to damage, but I still don't think I'll be ranking and playing with my 7* sable. It would be a different story If they gave an infuriate or made the enemy AI more aggressive the more shocks they had.

    I don't see how they missed the mark? They made her damage loop actually work and made her a lot of fun to play. They've already said that they don't want to give every character that needs to intercept an Infuriate because the goal would be to just fix the ai
    lol how long ago was that now?
  • BeastDadBeastDad Member Posts: 2,053 ★★★★★
    She’s only relevant with class advantage and even then I’m not using her over other skill champs.
  • BendyBendy Member Posts: 7,864 ★★★★★
    BeastDad said:

    She’s only relevant with class advantage and even then I’m not using her over other skill champs.

    Not really true her fervor is 80% each stack so 240% the crit shocks are gonna be useful even outside of the class advantage
  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 8,820 ★★★★★
    edited January 7
    Besides ROL and LOL, has anyone tested her vs defenders like Photon, Thing, etc?
  • BendyBendy Member Posts: 7,864 ★★★★★
    EdisonLaw said:

    Besides ROL and LOL, has anyone tested her vs defenders like Photon, Thing, etc?

    Abyss thing she was great for as the 100% disorient locked him down plus 6k from immune photon thats a war thing but im pretty sure one heavy then a mine into sp2 will shred as 550k was 1 mine
  • Herbal_TaxmanHerbal_Taxman Member Posts: 955 ★★★★
    They definitely made her better and I’ve always thought she’s fun to play. I just don’t think they gave her anything to justify the additional complexity in a really tricky fight.

    Maybe the disorient against science is better than I realize. Sure would be cool if we had some testing maps aside from RoL, LoL. But we’ve already run that idea into the ground on a different thread, haven’t we?
  • BendyBendy Member Posts: 7,864 ★★★★★
    But thing that will hinder isnt shock immunes but energy resist
  • BendyBendy Member Posts: 7,864 ★★★★★
    Herbal_Taxman said:

    They definitely made her better and I’ve always thought she’s fun to play. I just don’t think they gave her anything to justify the additional complexity in a really tricky fight.

    Maybe the disorient against science is better than I realize. Sure would be cool if we had some testing maps aside from RoL, LoL. But we’ve already run that idea into the ground on a different thread, haven’t we?

    I use it still as testing as where else can u find the perfect health as if she shred 550k anything in acts will be quicker lab is 1.5m but thats pretty quick
  • Wolf911Wolf911 Member Posts: 653 ★★★
    I still think they should have given her the cornered passive that kate has which increases chance to throw specials
  • Herbal_TaxmanHerbal_Taxman Member Posts: 955 ★★★★
    The problem is the diversity of champs, or lack thereof. If you need to practice against a defender released in the last five years, your only option is to take a three star champ against your own six or seven star version of the defender. And there are no nodes to speak of to allow us to fully test out a champ that’s designed to interact with fight mechanics that go beyond the opponents base kit.
  • BeastDadBeastDad Member Posts: 2,053 ★★★★★
    Bendy said:

    BeastDad said:

    She’s only relevant with class advantage and even then I’m not using her over other skill champs.

    Not really true her fervor is 80% each stack so 240% the crit shocks are gonna be useful even outside of the class advantage
    Tell me which of these 7*’s you are using her over:

    Shang
    Chee
    Cat
    Mole
    Masacre
    Bones

    Let’s not act like she’s something she’s not.
  • TotemCorruptionTotemCorruption Member Posts: 204 ★
    I played some with my 7 version today. I can't tell who's more mediocre, her or BWDO....
Sign In or Register to comment.