Bullying and Harassment against my gender

1246789

Comments

  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,242 ★★★★★
    DNA3000 said:

    I would say it would be best if everyone just walked away from this thread and let it die, but the odds of that happening aren't high. So instead I will say anyone who doesn't want to have their posts carefully scrutinized by the moderators when they inevitably review the thread (and trust me, they will be) should remember that there is no "he started it" rule on the forums. Everyone is responsible for their own conduct on the forums (and for that matter in global) irrespective of what anyone else says or does.

    Escalating this type of discussion has in the past been actionable. Fair warning.

    Thanks for the reminder. Some subjects are hard to walk away from.
  • TheD0C_Of_NegativesTheD0C_Of_Negatives Member Posts: 76
    kvirr said:

    oh really, so why wasn’t there a S as the end of your sentence in the original comment?

    If you were taught English, which clearly you were, you would understand that if your gonna eat someone’s cookies, you put a S at the end to make it plural, now using context clues we can see how you we’re talking sexually prior to the cookie message, meaning if we connect the dots with slang terms to cookie, considering you didn’t use the proper Plural ending, we can confidently say you 100% meant you would eat this persons private, and further proof is that this person you knew was a female, which lines with the slang of cookie, so no, you didn’t mean you would eat their nice home baked cookies.


    ( wow is this my detective time ? )
    Why would I say I would eat baked cookies? It was a single sentence. A singular sentence I said. Now it's being thrown in my face when sex has nothing to do with it?? Mature.
  • TheD0C_Of_NegativesTheD0C_Of_Negatives Member Posts: 76
    kvirr said:

    I didn’t say you should say you would eat baked cookies, I said, a person educated in 3rd grade English knows that a statement “ I would eat cookies cookie” isn’t grammatically correct, and your phone would correct it because of autocorrect, meaning you probably intentionally did it the way you said it, now if you had said “I would eat cookies cookies” that’d be different, because a female doesn’t have “cookies” in slang they have a cookie in slang, which ONCE AGAIN, you knew it was a female because you sexually said something about it prior.


    Your not being the anything with that horrible excuse
    So damn what?
  • kvirrkvirr Member Posts: 2,114 ★★★★★
    edited January 25

    Everyone, it's over. This turned into an extreme mess. What's important is that both parties know they're in the wrong. Let's all move away from the thread, and continue on, shall we?

    At this point. I’d be fine with it. If OP responds, with the same stupid stuff on how everyone ganged up on them and how we are all stupid, well I’ll be back too
  • TheD0C_Of_NegativesTheD0C_Of_Negatives Member Posts: 76
    kvirr said:

    At this point. I’d be fine with it. If OP responds, with the same stupid stuff on how everyone ganged up on them and how we are all stupid, well I’ll be back too
    But you all did. At the end of the day, were all getting punished. So just shut up already.
  • TheD0C_Of_NegativesTheD0C_Of_Negatives Member Posts: 76
    kvirr said:

    the point being that this person under the user cookie, could be a minor, which is a high possibility because this is a kids game after all. My 11 year old brother plays this game. ( with global disabled ofc )


    which all leads back to my previous statement on how you could have POTENTIALLY assumed a person, and dare I say sexually. You might jump through my phone screen
    Half of the people who play mcoc are adults. Neeson is an example
    You can't use the kid card considering I'm still legally a minor myself
    You're just trying to make me seem like a pedo
    It's not working with me.
  • TheD0C_Of_NegativesTheD0C_Of_Negatives Member Posts: 76
    -_-
  • TheD0C_Of_NegativesTheD0C_Of_Negatives Member Posts: 76
    Kerneas said:

    Posts ragebait, gets rage. Surprise where?

    Honestly, I dunno what purpose does the global serve. Everyone normal just disables it to be shielded from babbling morons (incl. OP right here)

    It was not intended to be ragebait. It's obvious you never read the full debate, and I'm not about to let you point fingers towards people who don't deserve it. My post, AS MENTIONED SEVERAL TIMES, was to raise awareness against global harassment. Not everyone should be forced to disable global because they can't take heat. Freedom of speech exists for a reason and I executed my right.
  • TheD0C_Of_NegativesTheD0C_Of_Negatives Member Posts: 76

    It's crazy reading this thread. You wanted to report harassment. But come to find out, you're in global saying you like 4 at once. You should be banned for it. There are literal children in there. You can't try and take the moral high road when you said something like that. It's inexcusable. I hope the mods come here and ban you from the game and forums.

    It's disgusting that you think what you did is less than what was done to you.
    Okay, I'll agree with you on that front. But is everything else here acceptable? Is that what you're trying to claim? Because regardless; mods are gonna punish those involved. Earlier in this post me and the other guy made amends, and chose to go out separate ways.
  • TheD0C_Of_NegativesTheD0C_Of_Negatives Member Posts: 76

    Yeah. You def raised awareness. What you said is also harassment.
    It goes both ways.
  • TheD0C_Of_NegativesTheD0C_Of_Negatives Member Posts: 76

    There's no amends to make. When you potentially expose children to that level, you don't deserve to be let off the hook. I am solely referring to the act that you described. Not your orientation.
    That is entirely perspective, but again, I suggest you go through the full forum page before opening your fat mouth.
  • TheD0C_Of_NegativesTheD0C_Of_Negatives Member Posts: 76
    Me and the other guy KNOW what we BOTH did was wrong. There's no point in you igniting an argument that was already squished.
  • kvirrkvirr Member Posts: 2,114 ★★★★★

    That is entirely perspective, but again, I suggest you go through the full forum page before opening your fat mouth.
    no reason to attack the other replier. You don’t know if they read the thread or not.
  • TheD0C_Of_NegativesTheD0C_Of_Negatives Member Posts: 76
    kvirr said:

    no reason to attack the other replier. You don’t know if they read the thread or not.
    whatever man. I've already tried to make peace with you people, and you're denying it because you're on some 'moral high horse'.
  • TheD0C_Of_NegativesTheD0C_Of_Negatives Member Posts: 76
    Let's be real.
  • TheD0C_Of_NegativesTheD0C_Of_Negatives Member Posts: 76
    This entire thread is at risk now
  • TheD0C_Of_NegativesTheD0C_Of_Negatives Member Posts: 76
    edited January 25
    If you wanna bring in rules, we already broke #2 of the forums.


This discussion has been closed.