Battlegrounds

Sjrishi · June 6

👀💀10 r4 7*damn!!

Buttehrs · June 6

Small potatoes. Also I only count 9.

Razorlord7 · June 6

That too in Vibranium 2.Lol. wait a second, Kabam shills will come and respond in a second.

Emilia90 · June 6

Razorlord7 said:
That too in Vibranium 2.Lol. wait a second, Kabam shills will come and respond in a second.

Forum users proving how immature they are again and again

TotemCorruption · June 6

Razorlord7 said:
That too in Vibranium 2.Lol. wait a second, Kabam shills will come and respond in a second.

Call it unfair or P2W or whatever, but why would it not happen in V2 at the beginning of the season?
Do you understand how BG works?

SirGamesBond · June 6

Razorlord7 said:
That too in Vibranium 2.Lol. wait a second, Kabam shills will come and respond in a second.

The guy went from d4 to v2 in 2 days......
So more players (like you) do not suffer.

It's time to get your eyes holder checked, it sounds hollow.

Sjrishi · June 6

TotemCorruption said:

Razorlord7 said:
That too in Vibranium 2.Lol. wait a second, Kabam shills will come and respond in a second.
Call it unfair or P2W or whatever, but why would it not happen in V2 at the beginning of the season?
Do you understand how BG works?

Its 100%valid for players like him to fall so low its because of stupid bugs in battlegrounds we respect the player he put some hard work in that all

Razorlord7 · June 6

@TotemCorruption Think for a moment and let me know how many r4's can we assume to face in gamma/arcane at the beginning of the season ?
Now assume how many a light spender will have ?

The game has had too many sales pushed closely to each other where it has basically ensured that your roster becomes irrelevant if you're not paying for these events.

BringPopcorn · June 6

SirGamesBond said:

Razorlord7 said:
That too in Vibranium 2.Lol. wait a second, Kabam shills will come and respond in a second.
The guy went from d4 to v2 in 2 days......
So more players (like you) do not suffer.

It's time to get your eyes holder checked, it sounds hollow.

I like this version of @SirGamesBond

TotemCorruption · June 6

Razorlord7 said:
@TotemCorruption Think for a moment and let me know how many r4's can we assume to face in gamma/arcane at the beginning of the season ?
Now assume how many a light spender will have ?

The game has had too many sales pushed closely to each other where it has basically ensured that your roster becomes irrelevant if you're not paying for these events.

Ok, I wasn't disagreeing about the pay to win structure of BGs right now.
I was just asking why you don't think it should happen in V2 at the beginning of the season.
Every account, large or small, starts in Victory Track.

Razorlord7 · June 6

@SirGamesBond The point being why did he have to start at diamond 4 in place of Vibranium 2 ?

I think more than me Kabam needs a check.

Emilia90 · June 6

Razorlord7 said:
@TotemCorruption Think for a moment and let me know how many r4's can we assume to face in gamma/arcane at the beginning of the season ?
Now assume how many a light spender will have ?

The game has had too many sales pushed closely to each other where it has basically ensured that your roster becomes irrelevant if you're not paying for these events.

I spend next to nothing and haven’t spent in over a year and I’m sitting at 115 points in GC right now. You can win fights against whale rosters. I only have 2 rank 4 champs

Your roster is only “irrelevant” if you wanna push for the very top, otherwise you’re fine

Zacharias10719 · June 6

Razorlord7 said:
@TotemCorruption Think for a moment and let me know how many r4's can we assume to face in gamma/arcane at the beginning of the season ?
Now assume how many a light spender will have ?

The game has had too many sales pushed closely to each other where it has basically ensured that your roster becomes irrelevant if you're not paying for these events.

Is it only whales that can have r4s then? Because last time I checked a ftp can have around 4 r4s right now. You're gonna be facing them a lot, probably best to get used to it and adapt

SirGamesBond · June 6

Razorlord7 said:
@SirGamesBond The point being why did he have to start at diamond 4 in place of Vibranium 2 ?

I think more than me Kabam needs a check.

We are all suppose to start in D4. Those are the rules set by the team. And that's what we will follow this season.

Starting is V2 is a bug.
Mr whale is right where a top player should be.
It's the OP is who is in the wrong place due to the bug.

Razorlord7 · June 6

@Zacharias10719 Appreciated. I'm on my way to my second R4 FTP. You're right. No point cribbing.

BringPopcorn · June 6

I find it funny people arguing VT or even GC placement of a "Whale"... You think his wallet cares about radiance at all? Lol

SirGamesBond · June 6

BringPopcorn said:

SirGamesBond said:

Razorlord7 said:
That too in Vibranium 2.Lol. wait a second, Kabam shills will come and respond in a second.
The guy went from d4 to v2 in 2 days......
So more players (like you) do not suffer.

It's time to get your eyes holder checked, it sounds hollow.
I like this version of @SirGamesBond

Been learning from the best!!! Haha

Razorlord7 · June 6

@TotemCorruption I do understand. All I'm asking is will it be too much to ask for a balanced matchmaking in VT ?

I do understand GC will have the survival of the fittest.

RN, VT feels like GC

BringPopcorn · June 6

Razorlord7 said:
@TotemCorruption I do understand. All I'm asking is will it be too much to ask for a balanced matchmaking in VT ?

I do understand GC will have the survival of the fittest.

RN, VT feels like GC

VT is the road to GC, basically you are asking for people to be able to get VT rewards no matter what.

Will3808 · June 6

Razorlord7 said:
@TotemCorruption I do understand. All I'm asking is will it be too much to ask for a balanced matchmaking in VT ?

I do understand GC will have the survival of the fittest.

RN, VT feels like GC

All other big games that have a pvp ladder use a similar matchmaking system to the current battlegrounds one. It’s fair for you to play anyone who’s in your tier regardless of their roster because both of you did the work to get there. Yes, it’s very annoying at the beginning of the season before things even out, but the system itself isn’t unfair.

And this is coming from someone who’s ftp and rejoined the game around a year ago. I’ve done almost all of the content in the game and have 3 r4s. I still run some 6*s and 7* r2s in my deck. I definitely don’t like facing decks like the one you posted above, but I do it because you have to to push.

Zacharias10719 · June 6

The radiance and radiance objs will have made it a lot harder for smaller accounts as well. There will be a lot of accounts that might not have started their bgs push until later that now will be going hard from day 1 to get the radiance objs. There will big accounts that never bothered with bgs that now will because of it too. If you're a smaller account it's best to be realistic about where you are in the hierarchy. You'll make the gc eventually if you've a decent roster and decent skill but you might not be able to do it in week 1 and you need to be fine with that. Not everyone is supposed to be able to get those objs.

Deacon · June 6

looks about right for the accounts i faced on my climb. i don't have a slouch account myself but man it feels inadequate based on my competition .. but i manage with a fine display of skill and drafting RNG lol

Herbal_Taxman · June 6

The effects of aggressive monetization are on full display this season.

— there are plenty of straight up monster decks. 6-10 r4s, all HoF champs, Dark P, etc.

— but you also see some really bizarre decks with 5-10 r3s and then a big dropoff to a bunch of 6r4s and stuff. It makes you realize how quickly and easily someone can buy the top layer of a great account, not just the champs but all the rankups mats needed to get them to r3 and sigged up.

MrSanguini · June 6

Will3808 said:

Razorlord7 said:
@TotemCorruption I do understand. All I'm asking is will it be too much to ask for a balanced matchmaking in VT ?

I do understand GC will have the survival of the fittest.

RN, VT feels like GC
All other big games that have a pvp ladder use a similar matchmaking system to the current battlegrounds one. It’s fair for you to play anyone who’s in your tier regardless of their roster because both of you did the work to get there. Yes, it’s very annoying at the beginning of the season before things even out, but the system itself isn’t unfair.

And this is coming from someone who’s ftp and rejoined the game around a year ago. I’ve done almost all of the content in the game and have 3 r4s. I still run some 6*s and 7* r2s in my deck. I definitely don’t like facing decks like the one you posted above, but I do it because you have to to push.

Other big PVP games don't have strict roster advantages like this game does though. Most PVP games using this ladder are skill-based, with everyone being on the same innate level. This game is mostly roster based, so the comparison can't be made as easily.

Battlegrounds

Comments