ZzyzxGuy wrote: » @Kabam Zibiit Did y'all also make synergies work again? Could really use a heads up about this too because that will really affect the next war's placement.
DL864 wrote: » ZzyzxGuy wrote: » @Kabam Zibiit Did y'all also make synergies work again? Could really use a heads up about this too because that will really affect the next war's placement. Agree can we get an answer on this
Bosley wrote: » Kabam Zibiit wrote: » Hey everyone, sorry about this. We did re-instate having defenders hidden in AW, but had intended to give everyone more of a heads-up before we did so. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused anyone. What the heck is wrong with you people? Do you have no one there that checks things before they're released? Issues, bugs, or just plain mistakes seem to pop up on weekly basis from changes that you haven't checked properly. What's the reasoning behind this ? You owe us that much to tell us the truth. In my mind it's another attempt at a cash grab not enhancing any type of gameplay. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
Kabam Zibiit wrote: » Hey everyone, sorry about this. We did re-instate having defenders hidden in AW, but had intended to give everyone more of a heads-up before we did so. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused anyone.
- To explicitly award points for skilled play and proper planning.
- To emphasize smart defender placement as a way to deny your opponent points, not as a way for them to give you points.
- Balance a decision for Alliances to guarantee Diversity points vs placing strong Duplicate Defenders to try and deny your opponent points.
- To avoid the mentality of not caring about whether you live or die in an encounter because it can simply be overcome using consumables.
LeNoirFaineant wrote: » Bosley wrote: » Kabam Zibiit wrote: » Hey everyone, sorry about this. We did re-instate having defenders hidden in AW, but had intended to give everyone more of a heads-up before we did so. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused anyone. What the heck is wrong with you people? Do you have no one there that checks things before they're released? Issues, bugs, or just plain mistakes seem to pop up on weekly basis from changes that you haven't checked properly. What's the reasoning behind this ? You owe us that much to tell us the truth. In my mind it's another attempt at a cash grab not enhancing any type of gameplay. You should be ashamed of yourselves. They were always going to hide the defenders again. How is not giving notice a cash grab? Would you have prepared differently somehow if you had known?
Amonthir wrote: » LeNoirFaineant wrote: » Bosley wrote: » Kabam Zibiit wrote: » Hey everyone, sorry about this. We did re-instate having defenders hidden in AW, but had intended to give everyone more of a heads-up before we did so. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused anyone. What the heck is wrong with you people? Do you have no one there that checks things before they're released? Issues, bugs, or just plain mistakes seem to pop up on weekly basis from changes that you haven't checked properly. What's the reasoning behind this ? You owe us that much to tell us the truth. In my mind it's another attempt at a cash grab not enhancing any type of gameplay. You should be ashamed of yourselves. They were always going to hide the defenders again. How is not giving notice a cash grab? Would you have prepared differently somehow if you had known? I can't speak for the other player, and I consider this a mistake rather than a cash grab, but yes, I certainly would have placed champs differently if I had known they would be hidden this war, since it allows me to try and sneak champions into unexpected nodes, etc. Whereas before, it mattered little, because they could preview their lane and bring exactly who they needed. Their mention of when they would hide them again suggested it would be after 17.0, not two wars beforehand.
Micklownick wrote: » Oh what short memories we have. To recap, new war comes out and its 100% diversity....kabam says its here to stay so players empty their resources into less then ideal champs, but boy do we cause an uproar They do a little bit of rejuggling, and it's 100% defender rating with a side of 100% diversity...players continue to empty their resources into less then ideal champs and we just continue to murmur back and forth while kabam says they are still making changes. Once everyone has exhausted their resources kabam says they have managed to fix it all and they were listening to us the whole time and have changed it back to what war used to be (mostly skill and good defenders) with just a small side of 2.5% diversity....sigh...here comes a gold realm and a wave of events just in time for 6*s.... My only point is this was a rolled out series of events to increase player spending both of resources and actual money. we just got the ole, wash, rinse, repeat treatment. your a clever clever girl kabam.
Xaris982 wrote: » @Kabam Miike tell me please. Attack bonus is per node? 54 nodes so max 38880 points for 3bgs? Or you measure only the points for defenders we place? I do the maths but I can’t understand it.