I supported top 30 prestige bcos battlegrounds deck size is 30 but......
1 season experiment with deck size 40, I don't mind for 1 season experiment
Same radiance reward though, no corresponding increase even though you need more rank up for 7* champions
What if Kabam actually like deck size 40 bcos more rank up are needed so more stuff to sell to players, more revenue means bigger bonus for employees, what's not to like for Kabam
Kabam could make it permanent without asking for your opinion about it
Some players have 30 rank 4 but now they need 40 rank 4, some bigger accounts already have 40+ but that's a minority, majority needs 10 more rank up for 1 season, you can don't bother for 1 season but if it's permanent in future den you have to deal with it
But top 30 prestige becomes obsolete bcos it no longer reflects the strength of a player's battlegrounds deck that accurately, that bothers me bcos what is top 30 prestige meant for?
My top 40 champions are 7* rank 4 and 3 so my prestige drops by 1k for top 40 which is quite minimal for my situation, different players will see different drop if they calculate manually to see the difference
If 40 deck size is permanent, den will top 30 prestige be changed as well? Nobody knows
Kabam wants to shake things up bcos things are getting stale, participation has dropped last season, increasing barrier to entry by requiring 40 champions doesn't seem to make it easier for more players to start playing battlegrounds though
Maybe start by increasing the rewards as you increase the deck size Kabam........
