One sided wars. Would you surrender if given the option?

ChrisYSG1ChrisYSG1 Member Posts: 17 ★
in Suggestions and Requests
Hear me out on this one. If surrender was an option in an obviously one sided war, would you take it to free up hero's for questing? The other alliance takes the win(still waiting 24hr to start another war) and gathering rewards at the end of that time. Remember some still play for fun. Being overran by the hard core time and time again ruins that part of the game.

Comments

  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • ChrisYSG1ChrisYSG1 Member Posts: 17 ★
    Just asking for opinions, let's be real. We've all said at some point, kabam did it again. It's probably a fairly small array picking these wars. Small alliances can't get a fair war. Maybe adding in an average MVP to the numbers could square it up?
  • ChrisYSG1ChrisYSG1 Member Posts: 17 ★
    To be clear, my alliance would never take this option. They would laugh me out of the room.
  • GwendolineGwendoline Member Posts: 945 ★★★
    With the war season rewards this would be a silly option. Every point counts, win or lose. Before the war season change I could see your point. But you could always not enter attack, that way you don't lose 3 more champs.
  • ChrisYSG1ChrisYSG1 Member Posts: 17 ★
    I hadn't taken into account the new changes. Still in the old war rewards state of mind. Thanks
  • phillgreenphillgreen Member Posts: 4,185 ★★★★★
    It should be an option but surrendering should also mean no rewards at all.

    You can quit every other game mode when it gets too hard, people are routinely told some content is above them but there is no such option in War.

    I would however limit the option to Leader with the agreement of officers, no one wants random members pulling out in the middle of the bout.
  • nIHSEANnIHSEAN Member Posts: 67 ★
    edited February 2018
    There should be an option for each player to surrender.
    When all the 30 members surrender the war ends
  • Patchie93Patchie93 Member Posts: 1,898 ★★★★
    nIHSEAN wrote: »
    There should be an option for each player to surrender.
    When all the 30 members surrender the war ends

    No just NO
  • NiteAndDaeNiteAndDae Member Posts: 670 ★★★
    Why surrender? To free up your champs? I get it that once it's revealed that your facing a trough opponent that you figure, why bother and would rather have your champs back to clear content, but I'd say to run your hardest and try to take them down! Even the best have off nights, and maybe you can take them!
  • colbyscipio987colbyscipio987 Member Posts: 1,027 ★★
    This option is dumb... Why would someone wanna surrender? That takes the fun out of the game.
  • BahamutBahamut Member Posts: 2,307 ★★★★
    You should’ve made this a poll, but yes. I it’s a war that’s so unbalanced that you actually can’t win then yes
  • ChrisYSG1ChrisYSG1 Member Posts: 17 ★
    For the people wondering why. I have a small second account in 200k alliance. We regularly face a full bg of r3 and r4 5*s. When you get ko'ed from 3 hits while blocking the fun is pretty well gone. It's just a topic, don't be so agro about it.
  • DhruvgDhruvg Member Posts: 287 ★
    No way , I'll rather put up a fight , something is better than nothing .
Sign In or Register to comment.