Karinshi wrote: » • Fixed an issue where Champions could not Block following an Evade Is Spark gonna be fixed while blocking AV sp1??
Leiva_dark wrote: » 1 month feeding the 2 threads, delayed controls and nothing in the update ?? ....
Kabam Miike wrote: » Karinshi wrote: » • Fixed an issue where Champions could not Block following an Evade Is Spark gonna be fixed while blocking AV sp1?? That is correct! This is what this bug is referring to.
djr17 wrote: » • Text corrections and clarifications for Iron Man (Infinity War) and Thanos (Infinity War) Why would you need to clarify text in Thanos IW, unless he will be a playable character/future AQ boss?
Kabam Miike wrote: » djr17 wrote: » • Text corrections and clarifications for Iron Man (Infinity War) and Thanos (Infinity War) Why would you need to clarify text in Thanos IW, unless he will be a playable character/future AQ boss? He might come back in some way or another, but we're not sure where or when.
Greifmaster911 wrote: » He could come back for the next may in correlation for avengers 4
IanMoone89 wrote: » Are you kidding me another side missions bad had enough we had 2 mons of it now your making it a 3rd month of side missions....we need a damn break....dont tell me in july will be another side mission for wasp film
Bahamut wrote: » Will there be any champion buffs? This seems like the perfect time to buff Colossus and Deadpool X-Force.
BitterSteel wrote: » IanMoone89 wrote: » Are you kidding me another side missions bad had enough we had 2 mons of it now your making it a 3rd month of side missions....we need a damn break....dont tell me in july will be another side mission for wasp film I truly don’t understand this mindset. It is solely your choice to do side missions. They are up to you to decide if they are worth time and effort. If you feel like you need a break and don’t want to do it then you make the decision not to complete it. There are a large number of players who feel burnt out and want less content. There are equally a large number of players who love having so much to do. If there’s a month of nothing, just an event quest then kabam annoys players who want to do something, whereas if they put side quests in then the people who want to do something are happy, and the people who want a break can have their break. Kabam are doing a great job having all this content, I loved dungeons (room for improvement but that’s besides the point), I hated vanquishing blows so I didn’t do a single one. Don’t get annoyed with kabam for releasing too much, just do the amount you want to do.
Wolfe wrote: » Hi Kabam. Just curious about the AA part. It was never mentioned before that AA’s stun from neutrotoxin was a bug since his released from a year back. Is it safe to say that this change constitute as a potential nerf to his inherent ability? If that is the case, it would be justifiable to request for a rank down ticket am I correct? I’ve pump loads of resources into AA and he is current at rank 4 as a five star and on sig level 135. So help me understand this if I’m mistaken because over a year of using both the four star and five star versions, I’ve never heard that that is a bug. Hence if the change is confirmed I would humbly like to request for a RDT to rank him down and take another champ up in his place.
Wolfe wrote: » Hi Kabam. Just curious about the AA part. It was never mentioned before that AA’s stun from neutrotoxin was a bug since his released from a year back. Is it safe to say that this change constitute as a potential nerf to his inherent ability? If that is the case, it would be justifiable to request for a rank down ticket am I correct?